Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Incorporation of potential for multimedia exposure into chemical hazard scores for pollution prevention.

Authors
Whaley-DA; Meloy-TP; Barrett-SS; Bedillion-EJ
Source
Drug Chem Toxicol 1999 Feb; 22(1):241-273
NIOSHTIC No.
20029705
Abstract
We are reporting a chemical hazard score for pollution prevention, called the Purdue score. The Purdue score provides a relative quantitative measure combining a variety of chemical hazards into a single quantitative hazard weighting factor for the non-expert to use. The main expected uses are to design safer products, assist in implementing and measuring achievement in pollution prevention, and as an adjunct for reporting Toxic Release Inventory data to the U.S. Government. Scoring results are presented for 200 Superfund chemicals, rank ordered by the worker hazard part of the score, by the environmental hazard part, and by combined worker and environmental hazard scores. We have reviewed the extent to which the Purdue score presently incorporates potential for multimedia pathway and multiroute absorption exposure. Until other possible uses have been carefully tested, peer-reviewed and published, users are advised to limit use of this system to planning, implementing and measuring pollution prevention and to enhancing the interpretation of Toxic Release Inventory data. The objective of this report is to look at how the structure of this score handles exposure to chemicals, both via multi-compartment pathways and multi-routes for contact or absorption health damage, as well as how it handles habitat degradation by chemicals. For all of these, the approach is built on inherent properties of each chemical, which are true for all sites and scenarios. The biggest obstacle to scoring is lack of measured chemical property data needed for scoring. We handle missing data by regression, quantitative structure activity relationship estimations, and a missing data default rule. The limitations of chemical hazard scoring are reviewed. At present, there is no widely accepted single measure of relative chemical hazard, against which to calibrate this hazard score for accuracy, except experience from industrial use. However, despite limitations, we suggest there is a strong value added for industry and society in availability of a concise, simple-to-use measure of relative chemical hazard. The Purdue score enables separate or combined consideration of chemical hazard to workers and to the natural environment. The Purdue score has potential for major cost savings in relative hazard ranking and business decision making regarding little-studied organic chemicals, because of the extensive use of advanced property estimation software. We conclude that there is societal need to warrant advanced development of this risk management tool, which is now ready for pilot use by industry. The Purdue score is mainly intended to assist and encourage businesses to implement and measure pollution prevention-especially small businesses--in a cost-effective way. The Purdue score relies strongly on sublethal toxicity, and there is practical potential for it to be used with thousands of chemicals.
Keywords
Pollutants; Pollution; Quantitative-analysis; Environmental-hazards; Occupational-hazards; Environmental-health; Environmental-pollution; Hazards; Hazardous-materials; Risk-analysis; Health-hazards
CODEN
DCTODJ
Publication Date
19990201
Document Type
Journal Article
Funding Type
Grant
Fiscal Year
1999
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
Grant-Number-T01-CCT-310455
Issue of Publication
1
ISSN
0148-0545
Source Name
Drug and Chemical Toxicology
State
WV
Performing Organization
West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Institute of Occupational and Environmental Health, Morgantown, West Virginia
TOP