Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Developing reliable ergonomics exposure assessment strategies for construction work.

Authors
Paquet-V; Punnett-L; Woskie-S; Buchholz-B
Source
Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, Vol. 5, San Diego, CA, July 30-August 4, 2000. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2000 Jul; 5:655-658
NIOSHTIC No.
20026181
Abstract
The objective of this research was to provide guidelines for the reliable assessment of ergonomic exposures in construction work. Using a modified work-sampling approach, two or three observers collected a total of 4852 observations on tasks performed by three trades (iron workers, carpenters and laborers) for periods of several weeks. At each observation, recorded exposure variables included non-neutral trunk posture, trunk flexion, lateral bending or torsion, arm(s) at or above shoulder height, kneeling, squatting or leg bending, load handling, manual materials handling, hand-tool use and power-tool use. The' frequency of exposure was calculated for each worker during each of the tasks on each of the days. ANOVA was used to assess the importance of task, between-worker variability and within-worker variability on exposures across days. A statistical resampling method (bootstrap) was then used to evaluate the reliability of exposure estimates for groups of workers performing the same task for different sampling periods. Most ergonomic exposures were found to vary significantly among construction tasks. In most cases, the between-worker component of variance within task was overshadowed by a large within-worker component of variance thought to consist largely of day-to-day differences in exposure and measurement error. When the average frequency of the ergonomic exposures was bootstrapped, the reliability of the most variable exposures tended to improve as the assessment periods approached 5 to 6 days, with marginal improvements for assessment periods longer than 6 days. Reliable estimates for the least variable exposures were obtained with 1 or 2 days of observation. Based on this study, a task-based approach for classifying ergonomic exposures may benefit epidemiologic research and the evaluation of controls in construction work. A preliminary analysis of exposure variability is recommended when determining sampling strategies, and when multiple exposures are assessed simultaneously, sampling periods exceeding 6 days may be required for reliable measures.
Keywords
Construction-industry; Construction-workers; Ergonomics; Musculoskeletal-system-disorders; Humans; Manual-lifting; Manual-materials-handling; Materials-handling; Hand-tools; Power-tools; Iron-workers; Iron-working-industry; Statistical-analysis; Epidemiology
Publication Date
20000730
Document Type
Conference/Symposia Proceedings
Funding Amount
751370
Funding Type
Cooperative Agreement; Construction
Fiscal Year
2000
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
ISBN No.
0945289138
Identifying No.
Cooperative-Agreement-Number-U02-CCU-308771; Cooperative-Agreement-Number-U02-CCU-312014
Priority Area
Musculoskeletal-system-disorders
Source Name
Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, Vol. 5, San Diego, CA, July 30-August 4, 2000
State
DC; CA
Performing Organization
Center to Protect Workers' Rights
TOP