Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Inhaled carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations in three escape hood respirators during rest and exercise.

Authors
Sinkule-E; Turner-N
Source
Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004 May; 36(Suppl 5):S245
NIOSHTIC No.
20025661
Abstract
Public agencies and private businesses have purchased air-purifying escape hood respirators (APEHR) for employee use during future acts of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear terrorism. NIOSH has initiated the development of performance standards for these escape-only respirators. PURPOSE: Three APEHR models (Models A, B, and C) were evaluated for inhaled carbon dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (O2) concentrations on four men and three women. METHODS: A breathing gas sample line was inserted through each escape hood into the nosecup or mouthpiece and positioned 0.5-1.0 cm from the subjects' lips. Treadmill testing was performed for 10 minutes each at standing rest, walking at 2.5 mph, and walking at 3.5 mph. RESULTS: During the treadmill testing of four men (mean body weight = 94.8 kg, range = 82.3-115.2 kg), minimum inhaled CO2 concentration (F1CO2 min) was 0.023 for Model A during rest. F1CO2 min did not exceed 0.016 and maximum inhaled O2 concentration (F1O2 max) did not fall below 0.192 for Models B and C at any work rate. For women wearing Models A and C (mean body weight = 60.6 kg, range = 58.5-63.4 kg), F1CO2 min was 0.04 and 0.029, estimated average inhaled CO2 concentration (F1CO2 ave) was 0.051 and 0.041, and F1O2 max was 0.172 and 0.178, respectively, at rest. For women wearing Model B, F1CO2 min never exceeded 0.015, F1CO2 ave never exceeded 0.04, and F1O2 max never fell below 0.193 at any work rate. One man could not wear Model A beyond minute two of the standing period, due to a gagging sensation caused by the mouth-piece. One woman was not able to wear Model A beyond minute two of the standing period or Model C beyond minute two of the 2.5 mph walking period. F1CO2 min was 0.044, F1CO2 ave was 0.052, and F1O2 max was 0.164 when this subject discontinued the test of Model A during the standing period. F1CO2 min was 0.044, F1CO2 ave was 0.055, and F1O2 max was 0.18 when this subject discontinued the test of Model C during the 2.5 mph walk. The neck dam of one APEHR model had to be cut for several subjects due to tightness. CONCLUSION: Compared to heavier body weights (= 82.3 kg), APEHR use in lighter subjects (= 63.4 kg) produced higher inhaled concentrations of CO2 and lower inhaled O2 concentrations, especially at rest.
Keywords
Respiratory-protective-equipment; Respiratory-protection; Respirators; Emergency-equipment; Biological-warfare-agents; Biological-weapons; Chemical-warfare-agents; Equipment-reliability; Equipment-design; Protective-equipment; Personal-protective-equipment; Personal-protection
CODEN
MSPEDA
CAS No.
124-38-9
Publication Date
20040501
Document Type
Abstract
Email Address
esinkule@cdc.gov
Fiscal Year
2004
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
ISSN
0195-9131
NIOSH Division
NPPTL; DSR
Source Name
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
State
PA; WV
TOP