Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Encouraging self-protective employee behavior: what do we know?

Authors
Peters-RH
Source
Proceedings of the 26th Annual Institute on Mining Health, Safety and Research, August 28-30, 1995, Blacksburg, Virginia. Tinney G, Bacho A, Karmis M, eds., Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1995 Aug; :83-94
Link
NIOSHTIC No.
20023319
Abstract
How can employees be stopped from engaging in unsafe work practices? It is often easier to prevent employees from performing unsafe acts through manipulations of the work environment than through various training or motivational programs. Therefore, it is important that accident prevention programs seek to identify the reasons for the unsafe behavior and to redesign tasks and the work environment (e.g., tools, equipment, physical surroundings) in order to remove employees from sources of harm and to prevent situations from arising that would prompt them to perform unsafe acts. Unfortunately, in the mining industry the work environment is often innately hazardous, rapidly changing, and difficult to predict, making it very difficult, perhaps impossible, to fully protect the employee by environmental manipulations. Therefore, it is important that effective methods be identified for influencing mine employees to work safely. Various strategies have been used to convince employees to avoid unsafe acts and/or adopt selfprotective behaviors. The intent of this article is to provide guidance to mine operators concerning the use of four techniques for influencing mine employees to work safely: (1) employee surveys, (2) incentives, (3) fear communications, and (4) disciplinary actions. The usual techniques for discouraging miners from performing unsafe acts appear to be limited to verbal warnings made during safety talks about the dangers of various unsafe acts and conditions, and in some cases, threats concerning disciplinary actions that might be taken if employees violate certain safety rules. However, these techniques have some significant drawbacks. The effects of verbal warnings to avoid dangerous acts or conditions are often of short duration. After employees have heard these warnings a couple of times, further repetitions of the warning probably have little or no impact. Supervisors are often reluctant to use formal disciplinary actions because they wish to avoid interpersonal conflicts and various other undesirable responses. Also, due to the physical layout of many mining operations, it is impossible for supervisors to be able to closely monitor whether their employees are complying with the safety rules. This suggests that admonitions and the creation of regulations or policies that threaten miners with punishment for violating safety rules are not a totally sufficient answer. We need to examine other options as well.
Keywords
Safety-practices; Safety-monitoring; Mining-industry; Safety-programs; Safety-research; Miners; Accident-prevention; Coal-mining; Coal-miners; Injury-prevention
Contact
NIOSH, Pittsburgh Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 18070, Pittsburgh, PA 15236
Publication Date
19950101
Document Type
Conference/Symposia Proceedings
Editors
Tinney-G; Bacho-A; Karmis-M
Fiscal Year
1995
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
NIOSH Division
PRC
Priority Area
Other Occupational Concerns
Source Name
Proceedings of the 26th Annual Institute on Mining Health, Safety and Research, August 28-30, 1995, Blacksburg, Virginia
State
PA; VA
TOP