Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Incorporating biomarkers into 21st century risk assessments.

Authors
Maier-A; DeBord-DG; Savage-RE
Source
Comment Toxicol 2001 Sep; 7(5-6):519-539
NIOSHTIC No.
20021804
Abstract
In 1987, the National Research Council Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology defined a biologic marker as any cellular or molecular indicator of toxic exposure, adverse health outcome or susceptibility. Since that time, significant advances in molecular biology and analytical chemistry have lead to the use of these biomarkers in both molecular epidemiology and toxicology studies, providing the potential to integrate the results of two disciplines, which ordinarily evaluate health outcomes at population and organism levels respectively. Tempered success in molecular epidemiology studies has evoked the call for employing biomarkers in the risk assessment process. The identification, development and validation of biomarkers for use in environmental and human health assessments have tremendous potential to improve the quality and reduce uncertainty in risk estimates. However, application of biomarker methodologies across disciplines and incorporation within risk assessment processes is inherently complex and difficult. The potential benefits of such a merger are significant. We discuss a number of issues relevant to the successful incorporation of biomarkers into the risk assessment process.
Keywords
Risk-analysis; Biomarkers; Analytical-processes; Analytical-chemistry; Author Keywords: biomarkers; risk assessment
Contact
Andrew Maier, Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment (TERA), 1757 Chase Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45223
CODEN
COTXEI
Publication Date
20010901
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
maier@tera.org
Fiscal Year
2001
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
5-6
ISSN
0886-5140
NIOSH Division
DART
Source Name
Comments on Toxicology: A Journal of Critical Discussion of the Current Literature
State
OH
TOP