Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Industrial responses to constrained OSHA regulation.

Authors
Pederson-DH
Source
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2000 May/Jun; 61(3):381-387
NIOSHTIC No.
20020774
Abstract
As part of the effort to reduce the size and economic impact of the federal establishment, congressional conservatives are proposing legislation to restrict the regulatory activity of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). These proposals push OSHA toward a purely consultative role, at a corresponding cost in direct regulatory capability. The Clinton administration's reinvention of government initiative is also moving OSHA toward a consultative role based on a strategy of cooperative compliance or industry self-regulation with a strong coercive foundation. Since both camps appear to agree that self-regulation can assure a safe and healthy workplace, the remaining debate concerns the extent to which coercive regulation is still needed. National survey data on the industrial provision of occupational safety and health services in the manufacturing sector were used to measure changes in industrial safety and health activity between 1972-74 and 1981-83. In conjunction with data on OSHA command-and-control regulatory activity from 1972 to 1979, these data permitted an examination of the relationship between command-and-control regulatory activities and changes in industrial behavior that could be regarded as a form of self-regulation. This analysis showed that coercive regulation by OSHA in the 1970s was significantly related to industry self-regulation efforts, although the relationship varied by industrial facility employment size and type of regulatory coercion. These results indicate that coercive regulation should be retained as an industrial incentive in any self-regulation policy paradigm. The results also provide evidence that OSHA regulatory policy should be based on anticipated differences in industrial response to various coercive measures.
Keywords
Occupational-health; Work-environment; Workplace-studies; Occupational-health-services; Occupational-safety-programs; Author Keywords: OSHA; safety and health; regulatory activity
Contact
David H. Pedersen, Health Related Energy Research Branch, Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, (MS R-44) 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
CODEN
AIHAAP
Publication Date
20000501
Document Type
Journal Article
Fiscal Year
2000
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
3
ISSN
0002-8894
NIOSH Division
DSHEFS
Source Name
American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
State
OH
TOP