Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Estimating upper confidence limits for extra risk in quantal multistage models.

Authors
Bailer-AJ; Smith-RJ
Source
Risk Analysis 1994 Dec; 14(6):1001-1010
NIOSHTIC No.
00227372
Abstract
Models for constructing upper confidence limit estimates of carcinogenic risk were compared. Upper confidence limits on risk were determined in a simulation study of carcinogenicity experiments using two bootstrap methods and compared with those obtained using commonly used likelihood based models. The models examined in the study were described. Parametric bootstrap and likelihood based methods gave better coverage probabilities compared with a nonparametric bootstrap model. The likelihood procedure tended to provide estimates higher than that of true extra risk and was more variable than the bootstrap procedures. The distance from the true extra risk was found to decrease with increasing background tumor rates and the amount of curvature in the actual underlying dose response function was found to affect the relative bias of all estimators. The authors conclude that although the likelihood based method had the best coverage probability properties, the parametric bootstrap procedure was less biased and less variable; however, neither method is considered sufficient for highly curved dose response patterns.
Keywords
NIOSH-Author; Statistical-analysis; Mathematical-models; Dose-response; Risk-factors; Analytical-models; Carcinogenesis; Risk-analysis
CODEN
RIANDF
Publication Date
19941201
Document Type
Journal Article
Fiscal Year
1995
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
6
ISSN
0272-4332
Source Name
Risk Analysis
TOP