Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Biomechanical modeling of asymmetric lifting tasks in constrained lifting postures.

Gallagher-S; Hamrick-CA; Love-AC
Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, October 8-12, 1990, Orlando, Florida. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1990 Oct; 34(10):702-706
A biomechanical model was used to study internal forces acting on the lumbar spine during asymmetric lifting tasks in restricted postures. Twelve healthy male subjects, nine of them experienced underground miners, participated in the study. Three independent variables were used; posture (Pos) for the lift (stooped or kneeling), height (Hgt) to which a box was lifted (35 or 70 centimeters (cm)), and weight (Wgt) of box (15, 20, or 25 kilograms (kg)). The lifting tasks were performed under a 1.2 meter roof that restricted posture. Electromyograms (EMGs) of eight trunk muscles (left and right erectores spinae, latissimus dorsi, external oblique, and rectus abdominis) were recorded during the lifting tasks and later digitized to derive a biomechanical model. The model produced estimates of muscle forces. Results showed that compression involved a significant PosxWgt interaction, and that it increased at a higher rate for kneeling than for stooping, although total compression was higher when kneeling. Lifting to a higher shelf increased compression. Peak lateral shear tended towards a nonsignificant increase in the kneeling position. Muscle recruitment was complicated due to changing conditions. Interaction of PosxHgtxWgt achieved significance at the 0.001 level. The activity of the latissimus dorsi were higher in the stooped posture than when kneeling, whereas increased erectores spinae activity was consistently seen while kneeling. The rectus abdominis muscles were slightly more active in the stooped position. The authors conclude that although the current model seems to give a good picture of the muscle loading on the spine, and will assist in the development of recommendations for lifting tasks in the mining environment, the model does not explain biomechanical factors responsible for the production of low back pain.
Biomechanics; Ergonomics; Human-factors-engineering; Manual-lifting; Mathematical-models; Mine-workers; Muscle-stress; Skeletal-stress; Manual-materials-handling
U.S. Bureau of Mines, P.O. Box 18070, Pittsburgh, PA, 15236
Publication Date
Document Type
Conference/Symposia Proceedings
Fiscal Year
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
NIOSH Division
Source Name
Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, October 8-12, 1990, Orlando, Florida