Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

A comparison of four personal sampling methods for the determination of mercury vapor.

Authors
McCammon-CS Jr.; Edwards-SL; Hull-RD; Woodfin-WJ
Source
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1980 Jul; 41(7):528-531
NIOSHTIC No.
00170679
Abstract
Four methods currently in use for the determination of personal exposure to mercury (7439976) vapor were compared. The four methods tested included the 3M passive Mercury Vapor Monitoring System, the tandem mercury sampling tube method developed by the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratories, the hopcalite tube method, and the iodine impregnated charcoal tube method. Each of the four sampling devices was exposed simultaneously to the same mercury vapor containing atmosphere at nominal mercury vapor concentrations of 0.05, 0.1 or sampling devices were described. At a mercury concentration of the Los Alamos procedure and the iodine charcoal method showed significant differences, but no other means compared two at a time were significantly different. At high mercury concentrations there were no significant differences between any of the means derived by the four procedures. The iodine charcoal tube method provided acceptable precision only at higher loadings of about 3 micrograms of mercury per tube. Of the four methods tested, all but the iodine charcoal tube method were demonstrated to give precise and reproducible mercury concentration determinations in the 0.05 to 0.2 mg/m3 range.
Keywords
NIOSH-Author; Air-monitoring; Air-sampling-equipment; Mercury-vapors; Measurement-equipment; Monitoring-systems; Analytical-instruments; Equipment-reliability
CODEN
AIHAAP
CAS No.
7439-97-6
Publication Date
19800701
Document Type
Journal Article
Fiscal Year
1980
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
7
ISSN
0002-8894
Source Name
American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
TOP