Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Field comparison of two methods for the determination of NO2 concentration in air.

Authors
Jones-W; Palmes-ED; Tomczyk-C; Millson-M
Source
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1979 May; 40(5):437-438
NIOSHTIC No.
00117481
Abstract
Two sampling methods for the determination of nitrogen-dioxide (10102440) in air were compared. The dosimeter method involved the measurement of a quantity of a gas transferred through a tube to a triethanolamine absorbent by molecular diffusion. The second method used a low flow pump to draw air through a glass tube containing two sections of a triethanolamine impregnated molecular sieve separated by an oxidizing section. To compare the two methods, air samples were collected in an underground salt mine in which diesel equipment was operated. For 16 sampling locations, the dosimeter method recorded nitrogen-dioxide concentrations ranging from 3.8 to 5.4 parts per million (ppm) while the tube method recorded a range of 3.2 to 5.5ppm. The authors conclude that the dosimeter method is somewhat more precise although both are suitable for industrial hygiene purposes. The passive dosimeters do not require a sampling pump, are lightweight, and reusable. The disadvantage of both techniques is that fluctuations of concentrations within the sampling period cannot be observed.
Keywords
NIOSH-Author; Analytical-methods; Analytical-processes; Nitrogen-oxides; Air-sampling; Air-sampling-equipment; Quantitative-analysis
CODEN
AIHAAP
CAS No.
10102-44-0
Publication Date
19790501
Document Type
Journal Article
Fiscal Year
1979
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
5
ISSN
0002-8894
Source Name
American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
TOP