Skip directly to local search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home
Share
Compartir

Mining Publication: Sonic Anemometer Airflow Monitoring Technique for Use in Underground Mines

NOTE: This page is archived for historical purposes and is no longer being maintained or updated.

June 2010

Image of publication Sonic Anemometer Airflow Monitoring Technique for Use in Underground Mines

Satisfying statutory requirements of total air quantity and air velocity in an underground mine requires airflow measurements. In this paper instrumentation and sampling strategies for accurate monitoring of airflow in an entry using two-axis and three-axis ultrasonic anemometers are evaluated. Currently other types of anemometers, mainly vane anemometers, are used for measurements underground. The drawbacks of these devices include following strict operational procedures and an inability to measure low flows. Ultrasonic anemometers are known for their accuracy, capability to measure low flows, and continuous measurement characteristics that have made them popular in various fields of research. Several steps are required to enable the use of ultrasonic anemometers underground. Results and lessons learned from experiments at the NIOSH Ventilation Gallery and its Experimental Mine are presented. Calibration of instruments and data acquisition is explained. Three instruments were used simultaneously in the underground testing facility for anemometer comparison and sampling location analysis. Continuous single-point measurements with ultrasonic anemometers and vane anemometer traverse measurement results underground were compared. The comparison showed slightly lower air velocity values with the ultrasonic anemometers. Factors affecting the selection of sampling locations underground were investigated to determine optimal locations. The optimal measurement location in a straight tunnel was found approximately 1/4 diameter from the tunnel walls. For uneven flows, curves, and obstructed tunnels several point measurements across the entry cross-section or flow simulations are recommended. Two ultrasonic anemometers were assessed in the laboratory, for the influence of dust deposition. The effects of two different dusts, rock dust and coal dust were evaluated. The dust exposure testing showed that coal dust rarely affected the ultrasonic anemometers and was easy to clean off of the instruments. Rock dust, however, tended to stick and cake on the instruments. Cleaning was required to avoid loss of signal with heavy build-up of dust.

Authors: AL Martikainen, HN Dougherty, CD Taylor, AL Mazzella

Conference PaperJune - 2010

  • Adobe Acrobat - Portable Document Format (.PDF)

    0.20 MB

NIOSHTIC2 Number: 20036994

Proceedings of the 13th U.S./North American Mine Ventilation Symposium, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, June 13-16, 2010. Hardcastle, McKinnon, eds., Sudbury, Ontario, Canada: MIRARCO - Mining Innovation, 2010; :217-224

 
Contact Us:
  • Office of Mine Safety and Health (OMSHR)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • 800-CDC-INFO
    (800-232-4636)
    TTY: (888) 232-6348
  • New Hours of Operation
    8am-8pm ET/Monday-Friday
    Closed Holidays
  • omshr@cdc.gov
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO
A-Z Index
  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #