Skip directly to local search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home

Mining Publication: Variation of Horizontal Stresses and Strains in Mines in Bedded Deposits in the Eastern and Midwestern United States

NOTE: This page is archived for historical purposes and is no longer being maintained or updated. Contact OMSHR if you need an accessible version of this document.

August 2003

Image of publication Variation of Horizontal Stresses and Strains in Mines in Bedded Deposits in the Eastern and Midwestern United States

In general, the direction of the maximum horizontal stress in the Eastern United States is fairly well defined. However, the variation of the magnitudes of the horizontal stresses is not very well understood. Because the horizontal stresses cause severe ground control problems in underground coal and limestone mines throughout the Eastern United States, a more complete understanding of how the magnitudes vary would be useful for developing mine design strategies to combat horizontal stress-related ground control problems. Therefore, in this National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) study, the variation of the magnitude of the horizon stresses in sedimentary deposits in the Eastern and Midwestern United States are examined with respect to two factors: the elastic modulus of the rock and the site depth. Stress measurements from 37 sites are used in the evaluation. Examining the applied excess strains indicates that the Eastern United States can be separated into high- and low-strain zones. For most of the Eastern United States, the maximum applied excess or tectonic strain ranges from only 300 to 550 micro strains. However, there is one area, a portion of the Beckley Seam in the central Appalachian region, where the strains are significantly higher than the other regions. In this higher strain zone, the maximum applied tectonic strains range from 700 to 1,000 micro strains. Regression models for each zone based on the elastic modulus can explain between 83% to 85% of the variation of the maximum horizontal stress. Because one region, the northern Appalachian district, has strains that are about 20% higher than the other regions in the low-strain zone, multiple strain models based on geographic regions were developed for the low-strain zone that can explain 87% to 91% of the maximum horizontal stress variation with the elastic modulus. Depth was found not to be a significant causal factor in any increase in the horizontal stress, even though the site depths ranged from 275 to 2,500 ft. Beyond a theoretical increase, based on Poisson's effect and gravity, no other increase in the horizontal stress with depth can be justified with these data. The most significant factor controlling the variation of the maximum horizontal stress is the elastic modulus of the rock, not the overburden depth.

Authors: DR Dolinar

Conference PaperAugust - 2003

  • Adobe Acrobat - Portable Document Format (.PDF)

    0.49 MB

NIOSHTIC2 Number: 20023430

Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, Peng SS, Mark C, Khair AW, Heasley KA, eds. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University, 2003 Aug; :178-185

 
Contact Us:
  • Office of Mine Safety and Health (OMSHR)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • 800-CDC-INFO
    (800-232-4636)
    TTY: (888) 232-6348
  • New Hours of Operation
    8am-8pm ET/Monday-Friday
    Closed Holidays
  • omshr@cdc.gov
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO
A-Z Index
  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #