![]() |
|||
|
NIOSH Publication No. 97-141:Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors |
July 1997 |
|
A Critical Review of Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck,
Upper Extremity, and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epidemiologic criteria used to examine studies of: | |
| 4.1 | Elbow MSDs associated with repetition/Risk indicator |
| 4.2 | Elbow MSDs associated with force/Risk indicator |
| 4.3 | Elbow MSDs associated with posture/Risk indicator |
| 4.4 | Elbow MSDs associated with vibration/Risk indicator |
| 4.5 | Epidemiologic studies evaluating elbow musculoskeletal disorders |
|
|
Epidemiologic criteria used to examine studies of elbow MSDs associated with repetition
| Study (first author and year) | Risk indicator (OR, PRR, IR or p-value)*, | Participation rate >70% | Physical examination | Investigator blinded to case and/or exposure status | Basis for assessing elbow exposure to repetition |
| Met at least one criterion: | |||||
| Andersen 1993a | 1.7 | Yes | No | Yes | Job titles or self-reports |
| Baron 1991 | 2.3 | No | Yes | Yes | Observation or measurements |
| Burt 1990 | 2.8 | Yes | No | Yes | Job titles or self-reports |
| Byström 1995 | 0.74 | Yes | Yes | No | Job titles or self-reports |
| McCormack 1990 | 0.51.2 | Yes | Yes | NR | Job titles or self-reports |
| Met none of the criteria: | |||||
| Ohlsson 1989 | 1.52.8 | NR | No | NR | Job titles or self-reports |
| Punnett 1985 | 2.4 | No | No | NR | Job titles or self-reports |
*Some risk indicators are based on a combination of risk factorsnot on repetition alone (i.e., repetition plus force, posture,
or vibration). Odds ratio (OR), prevalence rate ratio (PRR), or incidence ratio (IR).
Indicates statistical significance.
Not reported.
Epidemiologic criteria used to examine studies of elbow MSDs associated with force
| Study (first author and year) | Risk indicator (OR, PRR, IR or p-value)*, | Participation rate >70% | Physical examination | Investigator blinded to case and/or exposure status | Basis for assessing elbow exposure to force |
| Met all four criteria: | |||||
| Chiang 1993 | 6.75 (males) 1.44 (females) |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Observation or measurements |
| Luopajärvi 1979 | 2.7 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Observation or measurements |
| Moore 1994 | 5.5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Observation or measurements |
| Met at least one criterion: | |||||
| Andersen 1993a | 1.7 | Yes | No | Yes | Job titles or self-reports |
| Baron 1991 | 2.3 | No | Yes | Yes | Observation or measurements |
| Byström 1995 | 0.74 | Yes | Yes | No | Job titles or self-reports |
| Dimberg 1987 | NR, | Yes | Yes | NR | Observation or measurements |
| Dimberg 1989 | NR | Yes | Yes | NR | Observation or measurements |
| Kurppa 1991 | 6.7 | Yes | Yes | N | Observation or measurements |
| Punnett 1985 | 2.4 | Yes | No | NR | Job titles or self-reports |
| Ritz 1995 | 1.41.7 | NR | Yes | Yes | Observation or measurements |
| Roto 1984 | 6.4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Job titles or self-reports |
| Viikari-Juntura 1991b | 0.88 | Yes | Yes | NR | Observation or measurements |
*Some risk indicators are based on a combination of risk factorsnot on force alone (i.e., force plus repetition, posture, or
vibration). Odds ratio (OR), prevalence rate ratio (PRR), or incidence ratio (IR).
Indicates statistical significance. If combined with NR, a significant association was reported without a numerical value.
Not reported.
Epidemiologic criteria used to examine studies of elbow MSDs associated with posture
| Study (first author and year) | Risk indicator (OR, PRR, IR or p-value)*, | Participation rate >70% | Physical examination | Investigator blinded to case and/or exposure status | Basis for assessing elbow exposure to posture |
| Met all four criteria: | |||||
| Luopajärvi 1979 | 2.7 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Observation or measurements |
| Moore 1994 | NR | Yes | Yes | Yes | Observation or measurements |
| Met at least one criterion: | |||||
| Dimberg 1987 | NR | Yes | Yes | NR | Observation or measurements |
| Dimberg 1989 | NR | Yes | Yes | NR | Observation or measurements |
| Hoekstra 1994 | 4.0 | Yes | No | Yes | Job titles or self-reports |
| Hughes 1997 | 37.0 | No | Yes | NR | Observation or measurements |
*Some risk indicators are based on a combination of risk indicatorsnot on posture alone (e.g., posture plus repetition, force, or vibration). Odds ratio (OR), prevalence rate ratio (PRR), or incidence ratio (IR).
Indicates statistical significance. If combined with NR, a significant association was reported without a numerical value.
Not reported.
Epidemiologic criteria used to examine studies of elbow MSDs associated with vibration
| Study (first author and year) | Risk indicator (OR, PRR, IR or p-value)*, | Participation rate >70% | Physical examination | Investigator blinded to case and/or exposure status | Basis for assessing elbow exposure to vibration |
| Met at least one criterion: | |||||
| Bovenzi 1991 | 4.9 | NR | Yes | Yes | Observation or measurements |
*Some risk indicators are based on a combination of risk indicatorsnot on vibration alone (e.g., vibration plus repetition,
force, or posture). Odds ratio (OR), prevalence rate ratio (PRR), or incidence ratio (IR).
Indicates statistical significance.
Not reported.