CDC logoSafer Healthier People  CDC HomeCDC SearchCDC Health Topics A-Z
NIOSH - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Skip navigation links Search NIOSH  |  NIOSH Home  |  NIOSH Topics  |  Site Index  |  Databases and Information Resources  |  NIOSH Products  |  Contact Us

 

NIOSH Publication No. 2000-127:

Worker Health Chartbook, 2000

September 2000

Characteristics of Injury Cases with Days away from Work Nonfatal Occupational Injuries by Industry and Cases with Lost Workdays Glossary Appendices References Focus on Mining Nonfatal Illness Nonfatal Injury Fatal Illness Fatal Injury Introduction Contents menu bar

4 Nonfatal Injury

Three surveillance systems provide information about the characteristics of nonfatal occupational injuries: the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII), the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). SOII is based on employer-generated workplace incident logs, and NEISS and NHAMCS are based on visits to emergency departments in hospitals. NEISS and NHAMCS both collect data on occupational injuries, but they use different methods.

Nonfatal occupational injuries constitute more than 90% of the events recorded by SOII. In 1997, more than 5.7 million nonfatal occupational injuries were estimated to have occurred in the United States, resulting in a rate of 6.6 cases per 100 full-time, private-sector workers. Among industry divisions, incidence rates for the total number of nonfatal injuries ranged from a low of 2.0 cases per 100 full-time workers in finance, insurance, and real estate to a high of 9.3 cases per 100 full-time workers in construction ( Figure 4–1). Rates for four of the eight industry divisions are above the average for all industries.

Injuries treated in emergency departments* are usually more urgent or severe than those treated in physicians' offices or walk-in clinics. NEISS estimates that approximately 3.6 million nonfatal occupational injuries were treated in U.S. hospital emergency departments in 1998. The average rate for all nonfatal occupational injuries treated in emergency departments that year was 2.8 per 100 full-time workers. The rate for men (3.4 per 100 full-time workers) was nearly twice the rate for women (2 per 100 full-time workers) (Figure 4–2). Rates were higher in younger workers (aged 16 to 19), with steady declines in both male and female workers aged 20 and older (Figure 4–2). Hands and fingers were the most commonly injured parts of the body, accounting for 30% of the total (Figure 4–3). Lacerations and punctures (26%), sprains and strains (25%), and contusions, abrasions, and hematomas (19%) were the most frequent types of injuries recorded in NEISS in 1998.

Figures 4–4 and 4–5 present the average annual rates of emergency department visits related to nonfatal occupational injuries recorded in NHAMCS for 1995–1997. Male workers aged 16–17 had the highest rate (nearly 10 per 100 full-time workers). The rate for black male workers was higher than the average rate for all workers. Overall, the rate for men exceeded the rate for women.

Back to Top


Figure 4-1 To view, click on image

Figure 4–1. Incidence rates for nonfatal occupational injuries in private industry by major industry division, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-2 To view, click on image

Figure 4–2. Rate of nonfatal occupational injuries treated in emergency departments, by age and sex, 1998. (Source: NEISS [1999].)


Figure 4-3 To view, click on image

Figure 4–3. Number of nonfatal occupational injuries treated in emergency departments, by anatomic site and type of injury, 1998. (Source: NEISS [1999].)


Figure 4-4 To view, click on image

Figure 4–4. Annual rates (and 95% CIs) of emergency department visits related to nonfatal occupational injuries in male and female workers aged 16 and older, by age group—averaged for 1995–1997. (The rate for female workers aged 16–17 does not meet the standards of reliability or precision.) (Source: NHAMCS [1999].)


Figure 4-5 To view, click on image

Figure 4–5. Annual rates (and 95% CIs) of emergency department visits related to nonfatal occupational injuries in black and white male and female workers aged 16 and older—averaged for 1995–1997. (Source: NHAMCS [1999].) 

Back to Top


 

Nonfatal Occupational Injuries
by Industry and Cases with Lost Workdays


The total number of nonfatal occupational injuries recorded by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) in SOII has fluctuated between 4.7 and 6.4 million per year over the last two decades. Many of these cases involved lost workdays.† The number of cases with days away from work fluctuated during that period; however, there was a 10-fold increase in cases with restricted work activity only (Figure 4–6). By 1997, 53% of cases involved no time away from work, 31% required at least 1 day away from work, and 16% involved restricted work activity only.

The incidence rate for total nonfatal occupational injuries over the past two decades ranged from a high of 9.2 cases per 100 full-time workers in 1978–1979 to a low of 6.6 cases per 100 full-time workers in 1997 (Figure 4–7). The incidence rate for cases with days away from work declined steadily from 1988 to 1997, and the incidence rate rose 120% for cases involving restricted work activity only.

Incidence rates for lost-workday cases of nonfatal occupational injury are shown for 1992–1997 by industry division in Figure 4–8. For all private industry during this period, the incidence rate declined 14% to 3.1 cases per 100 full-time workers. Finance, insurance, and real estate had the largest relative decline (27%), and construction had the largest absolute decline (1.3 cases per 100 full-time workers). Transportation and public utilities showed the least decline, both relatively (4%) and absolutely (0.2 cases per 100 full-time workers). Injury cases with and without lost workdays in 1997 (including days away from work and days of restricted activity only) are shown by industry division in Figure 4–9. The number of injuries ranged from a low of 46,000 in mining to a high of 1.7 million in manufacturing. The percentage of injury cases involving lost workdays ranged from a low of 38% in finance, insurance, and real estate to a high of 73% in mining.

The increasing incidence rate for cases involving restricted work activity only (Figure 4–7) is presented by industry division in Figure 4–10 for 1992–1997. The percentage of cases with restricted work activity only is shown for each industry division in Figure 4–11 for 1992 and 1997. In both years, manufacturing had the largest percentage of lost-workday cases with restricted activity only (32% and 48%, respectively).

Back to Top


Figure 4-6 To view, click on image

Figure 4–6. Number of nonfatal occupational injury cases in private industry by type of case, 1976–1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-7  To view, click on image

Figure 4–7. Incidence rate of nonfatal occupational injury cases in private industry by type of case, 1976–1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-8  To view, click on image

Figure 4–8. Incidence rates for lost-workday cases of nonfatal occupational injury in private industry by industry division, 1992–1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


 

Figure 4-9 To view, click on image

Figure 4–9. Number of nonfatal occupational injury cases in private industry without and with lost workdays by industry division, 1997. Percentage of cases with lost workdays also is shown. (Source: SOII [1999].)  


Figure 4-10 To view, click on image

Figure 4–10. Incidence rates in private industry for nonfatal occupational injury cases involving days of restricted work activity only, by industry division, 1992–1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-11 To view, click on image

Figure 4–11. Percentage of nonfatal occupational injury cases with lost workdays involving restricted work activity only, by industry division, 1992 and 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)

Back to Top


 

Characteristics of Injury Cases
with Days away from Work


The total number of nonfatal occupational injury cases involving days away from work for 1992–1997 is shown in Figure 4–12 for seven injury categories. Sprains, strains, and tears accounted for the largest number of events, with approximately 799,000 cases in 1997. Nearly half those cases (about 385,000) involved the back, accounting for more than 80% of all traumatic injuries and disorders to the back. Other categories accounting for many days away from work included bruises and contusions (with nearly 166,000 cases in 1997), cuts and lacerations (with approximately 134,000 cases), and fractures (with approximately 119,000 cases). Presented separately for each of the seven injury categories are charts showing the distributions of cases by (1) major industries, (2) occupational groups, and (3) the sources of the disorder, events or exposures leading to the disorder, or the body parts affected.


Figure 4-12 To view, click on image

Figure 4–12. Number of nonfatal occupational injury cases with days away from work in private industry by type of injury, 1992–1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)   
 


 

Sprain, Strain, and Tear Cases
with Days away from Work, 1997

Nearly half of the approximately 799,000 cases of sprains, strains, and tears involving days away from work in 1997 occurred in services (27%) and manufacturing (21%) (Figure 4–13). Most of these injuries were experienced by operators, fabricators, and laborers (42%) and service personnel (19%) (Figure 4–14). Overexertion was the most common event leading to a sprain, strain, or tear (Figure 4–15). Men accounted for nearly two-thirds of the sprain, strain, and tear cases. Half of the cases required 6 or more days away from work.


Figure 4-13 To view, click on image

Figure 4–13. Number and distribution of sprain, strain, and tear cases with days away from work in private industry by industry division, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)            


Figure 4-14 To view, click on image

Figure 4–14. Number and distribution of sprain, strain, and tear cases with days away from work in private industry by occupational group, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-15 To view, click on image

Figure 4–15. Number and distribution of sprain, strain, and tear cases with days away from work in private industry by event or exposure, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].) 


Back, Spine, or Spinal Cord Cases with Days away from Work, 1997

Nearly two-thirds of the approximately 472,000 back, spine, and spinal cord cases in 1997 occurred in services (28%), manufacturing (21%), and retail trade (16%) (Figure 4–16). Most of the back, spine, and spinal cord disorders were experienced by operators, fabricators, and laborers (41%) and service personnel (19%) (Figure 4–17). The most common sources of cases were containers (26%), worker motion or position (17%), and parts and materials (12%) (Figure 4–18). The event associated with most cases was overexertion, which accounted for 63% of the cases.


Figure 4-16 To view, click on image

Figure 4–16. Number and distribution of back, spine, and spinal cord cases with days away from work in private industry by industry division, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].) 


To view, click on image

Figure 4–17. Number and distribution of back, spine, and spinal cord cases with days away from work in private industry by occupational group, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-18 To view, click on image

Figure 4–18. Number and distribution of back, spine, and spinal cord cases with days away from work in private industry by source of disorder, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Bruise and Contusion Cases with Days away from Work, 1997

Most of the approximately 166,000 bruise and contusion cases with days away from work in 1997 occurred in manufacturing (24%), services (22%), and retail trade (19%) (Figure 4–19). Together, operators, fabricators, and laborers and service personnel experienced more than half of these injuries (Figure 4–20). The most common sources of injury were floors and ground surfaces (26%), vehicles (15%), and parts and materials (13%) (Figure 4–21). Most job-related bruises and contusions resulted from workers being struck by, struck against, or caught in objects, equipment, or materials. In 1997, a median of 3 lost workdays resulted from bruises and contusions. Nearly 9% of these injuries required 31 or more days away from work.


Figure 4-19 To view, click on image

Figure 4–19. Number and distribution of bruise and contusion cases with days away from work in private industry by industry division, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)       


Figure 4-20 To view, click on image

Figure 4–20. Number and distribution of bruise and contusion cases with days away from work in private industry by occupational group, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-21 To view, click on image

Figure 4–21. Number and distribution of bruise and contusion cases with days away from work in private industry by source of disorder, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)

Back to Top


Cut and Laceration Cases
with Days away from Work, 1997

More than half of the approximately 134,000 cut and laceration cases with days away from work in 1997 were in manufacturing (28%) or retail trade (26%) (Figure 4–22). Operators, fabricators, and laborers experienced 42% of cuts and lacerations, and precision production, craft, and repair personnel experienced 24% (Figure 4–23). The most common sources of injury were floors and ground surfaces (25%), machinery (21%), and parts and materials (20%) (Figure 4–24). Finger cuts and lacerations accounted for half of all cuts and lacerations involving days away from work. A median of 3 days away from work resulted from cuts and lacerations.


Figure 4-22 To view, click on image

Figure 4–22. Number and distribution of cut and laceration cases with days away from work in private industry by industry division, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)       


Figure 4-23 To view, click on image

Figure 4–23. Number and distribution of cut and laceration cases with days away from work in private industry by occupational group, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-24 To view, click on image

Figure 4–24. Number and distribution of cut and laceration cases with days away from work in private industry by source of disorder, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Fracture Cases with
Days away from Work, 1997

Most of the approximately 119,000 fracture cases with days away from work in 1997 occurred in manufacturing (25%), services (18%), and construction (16%) (Figure 4–25). Most of these injuries were experienced by operators, fabricators, and laborers (43%) and precision production, craft, and repair personnel (23%) (Figure 4–26). The most common sources of injury were floor and ground surfaces (43%) and parts and materials (14%) (Figure 4–27). Half of the occupational fractures in 1997 required 21 or more days away from work for recuperation. The categories struck by object and falls on the same level each accounted for more than 30,000 fractures.


Figure 4-25 To view, click on image

Figure 4–25. Number and distribution of fracture cases with days away from work in private industry by industry division, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].) 


Figure 4-26To view, click on image

Figure 4–26. Number and distribution of fracture cases with days away from work in private industry by occupational group, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-27 To view, click on image

Figure 4–27. Number and distribution of fracture cases with days away from work in private industry by source of disorder, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Heat Burn and Scald Cases
with Days away from Work, 1997

More than half of the approximately 30,000 heat burn and scald cases with days away from work in 1997 occurred in retail trade (39%) and manufacturing (26%) (Figure 4–28). Most of these injuries were experienced by service personnel (44%) and operators, fabricators, and laborers (30%) (Figure 4–29). Twenty-four percent of heat burn and scald cases affected the hand (except fingers), 14% affected multiple body parts, and 12% affected the foot or toe (Figure 4–30). A median number of 4 days away from work resulted from heat burns and scalds.


Figure 4-28 To view, click on image

Figure 4–28. Number and distribution of heat burn and scald cases with days away from work in private industry by industry division, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)    


Figure 4-29 To view, click on image

Figure 4–29. Number and distribution of heat burn and scald cases with days away from work in private industry by occupational group, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-30 To view, click on image

Figure 4–30. Number and distribution of heat burn and scald cases with days away from work in private industry by part of body affected, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


 

Amputation Cases with
Days away from Work, 1997

More than half of the approximately 10,850 amputation cases with days away from work in 1997 occurred in manufacturing (51%) (Figure 4–31). Operators, fabricators, and laborers experienced 60% of amputations (Figure 4–32). Machinery was the major source of amputation injury (57%) (Figure 4–33). Men accounted for 87% of occupational amputations. Nearly 10,200 amputations (93.8%) were to fingers. A median number of 18 days away from work resulted from amputations.


Figure 4-31 To view, click on image

Figure 4–31. Number and distribution of amputation cases with days away from work in private industry by industry division, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-32 To view, click on image

Figure 4–32. Number and distribution of amputation cases with days away from work in private industry by occupational group, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)


Figure 4-33 To view, click on image

Figure 4–33. Number and distribution of amputation cases with days away from work in private industry by source of disorder, 1997. (Source: SOII [1999].)   


 Updated on 06/25/02

Back to Top


Worker Health Chartbook 2000 - cover