Primary Navigation for the CDC Website
CDC en Espaņol

New Investigator Training and Doctoral Dissertations

CDC-RFA-CE08-005
Dissertation Grant Awards for Doctoral Candidates for Violence-Related Injury Prevention Research in Minority Communities (R36)


Sarah Lindstrom
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: (410)955–2461
E mail: slindst1@johnshopkins.edu

Grant Number: CE001374
Project Title: Modifying the School Environment to Reduce Violence: Suggestions from Students
Project Period: 08/01/2008 – 07/31/2009


Abstract:

School violence impacts the social, psychological, and physical well being of both students and teachers and disrupts the learning process. Most federal mandates, research, and school interventions to address school violence have focused on the individual's contribution to violence and not on the contribution of the school environment. While research has suggested that the school social and physical environment impact the occurrence of school violence, less is known about the specific factors of this environment that contribute to violence or their interconnection. These factors offer schools another possible intervention point to reduce violence and its sequelae. Objectives This study primarily aims to understand what factors of the school social and physical environment encourage or discourage violence from occurring at school. Information about the mechanisms by which these factors contribute to the occurrence and severity of violence at school will also be examined.  Secondarily, differences in the perceptions of factors and their impact will also be examined based on select individual level characteristics (e.g. gender, experience with violence). Study Design Concept mapping sessions will be conducted with multiple groups of Baltimore City public high school students. These sessions will allow for a generation of statements about the social and physical environment's contribution to violence, a rating of each statement's importance for the initiation, cessation, and severity of violence, a generation of a conceptual framework of the contribution of the social and physical environment and an explanation of this conceptual framework. Analyses of the reliability and validity of the resulting conceptual framework will be undertaken. Participants Approximately 60 students from 5 diverse geographic locations in Baltimore City will participate in all three concept mapping sessions. These youth will all be students of the Baltimore City Public School System, a large urban school system that serves primarily African American students. Setting High school students will be recruited from after school programs under the auspices of the Family League of Baltimore City. All sessions will be conducted during normal after school activities. Outcome Measures This study will result in the creation of conceptual frameworks illustrating how students believe the school environment contributes to the problem of school violence. The conceptual frameworks will highlight the main components of the environment that impact violence. Additionally, information about how these components, as well as the factors that form them, impact the initiation, cessation, and severity of violence at school will be gathered. A comparative analysis between the conceptual frameworks of groups of students at both the framework and factor level will be completed. Additionally, differences in perceptions of factor importance by select individual level characteristics will be evaluated.



Susan Ghanbarpour
Johns Hopkins University
615 N. Wolfe Street
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: (410)502–7863
FAX: (410)955–2303
E mail: sghanbar@jhsph.edu

Grant Number: CE001401
Project Title: Understanding Factors that Influence Safety Behaviors Practices by IPV Victims
Project Period: 08/01/2008 – 07/31/2009


Abstract:

Intimate partner violence is a serious public health concern for which effective interventions are urgently needed. One approach for prevention efforts is to focus on safety behaviors that women in abusive relationships can adopt, such as going into shelter and obtaining protective orders, to help keep them safer and facilitate ending abuse. The findings from the proposed qualitative study will provide insight into the barriers and facilitators that women experience to practicing safety behaviors, and help victim services providers tailor safety planning recommendations to accommodate women's particular needs and circumstances. Objectives: This research will address four main questions: (1) what safety behaviors do women in abusive relationships know about and practice, and how effective do they believe them to be? (2) What are the issues and circumstances that influence women's decisions to practice particular safety strategies? (3) What did women think about a risk assessment and safety planning intervention they received? (4) What are the critical elements of a customizable safety planning tool designed for use by professionals who serve IPV victims? Study Design: The proposed study will employ two different qualitative methodologies: interviews and focus groups. 40 African American victims of intimate partner violence who received the Danger Assessment intervention will be purposively selected and interviewed once using an in depth semistructured interview format. The 2 focus groups, comprising purposively selected local and regional victim services providers will each be convened once. Both the interviews and focus groups will be recorded, and the resulting transcripts will be coded and analyzed using the grounded theory approach to identify salient themes. The qualitative interview findings will be combined with quantitative data collected from the same participants through the Danger Assessment project, to identify and analyze patterns. Setting: Baltimore, MD, a Northeastern coastal U.S. city. Participants: Interview participants: 40 African American victims of intimate partner violence, aged 18 54, who received the Danger Assessment intervention and participated in previous quantitative data collection. Focus group participants: 2 groups of 8 12 participants each. One group comprises local victim services providers who implemented the intervention; the other is drawn from a regional coalition of domestic violence victim services providers, whose members include health care providers, law enforcement, and community based advocates. Interventions: The proposed qualitative study will build on quantitative data from a currently funded CDC/NCIPC intervention, "Evaluation of a Danger Assessment and Safety Education Intervention for Victims of Intimate Partner Violence" (the DA project). The DA project is a collaboration between Johns Hopkins and the House of Ruth, a community based shelter and service provider for victims of domestic violence. It is evaluating an intervention that assesses and communicates the level of danger faced by a woman in an abusive relationship, and recommends adopting appropriate safety behaviors. The intervention is administered by the House of Ruth's legal clinic to a population of predominantly lower income urban African American women seeking temporary protective orders against their abusive partners. The DA project's overall goal is to ascertain whether women who receive the intervention perceive their risk more accurately, adopt more safety behaviors, and are safer at follow-up than those in the comparison group. Outcome Measures: This qualitative study will use a grounded theory approach. The goal of this approach is to elicit information from participants to help build theory about issues and circumstances that influence the practice of safety behaviors by IPV victims, and create a customizable safety planning tool that can be used by victims services providers. Thus, the outcomes are not determined a priori, but will reflect analysis of the responses to the main research questions outlined in the Objectives: safety behaviors practiced by women in abusive relationships and women's beliefs about their effectiveness; the issues and circumstances that influence women's decisions to practice particular safety strategies; women's thoughts about the intervention they received; and a customizable safety planning tool designed for use by professionals who serve IPV


Back to Top