Evaluating Mosquitoes for Insecticide Resistance
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Help Glossary Quit    
3 of 3
Menu

Site Contents

 Home

 About this course
Course Topics

 Disease Vectors

 Strategies for Resistance Management

 Resistance Assays

 Case Studies
 Florida (Indian River)
 Haiti (Les Cayes)
 Guatemala
Supplements

 Links and Resources

 Companion Materials

 Send a question or comment

Guatemala

Focal Nature of Insecticide Resistance in Guatemala and Its Change with Time.

Purpose

  • To demonstrate use of biochemical assay techniques to investigate multiple resistance.
  • To show how these methods may be used to document the presence of resistance foci.
  • To illustrate how resistance levels and mechanisms may differ at specific locations within a control area.
  • To illustrate how enhanced levels of insecticide resistance enzymes may be associated with areas of more extensive agricultural use of insecticides.

Background

In 1985-1989, Anopheles albimanus mosquito populations from the Pacific Coast of Guatemala showed evidence of elevated esterase and insensitive acetylcholinesterase resistance mechanisms. The insensitive acetylcholinesterase resistance mechanism was originally selected by the carbamate insecticide propoxur. This resistance crossed to the organophosphate insecticide fenitrothion. Carbamate-selected cross-resistance between carbamates and organophosphates is known from a number of insect species. Collection of biochemical resistance data from all over the country revealed some interesting trends regarding resistance.
Map of Study area: Guatemala
Figure 1: Map showing the 21 collection sites in Guatemala; at least 200 mosquitoes were collected from each location (total collection, 9417).

 

Data
Figure 2. Biochemical (microplate) assay data for the elevated esterase resistance mechanism in agricultural and non-agricultural regions of Guatemala.

Figure 3. Biochemical (microplate) assay data for the insensitive acetylcholinesterase resistance mechanism showing areas within the same state with dramatically different resistance levels.

Figure 4. Biochemical (microplate) assay data for the elevated esterase resistance mechanism showing areas within the same state with dramatically different resistance levels.

Conclusions

  • Both the high esterase and the insensitive acetylcholinesterase resistance mechanisms occurred at much higher frequency in areas of intensive agriculture.
  • Resistance was focal, with locations near each other sometimes showing highly variable resistance levels.
  • Biochemical methods allow detailed comparison of resistance levels over a large geographic area.
Go to Top

| Help | Glossary | Quit | Previous | Menu | Next

| NCID Home | | CDC Home | Search | Health Topics A-Z |

This page last reviewed May 7, 2002

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Infectious Diseases

Privacy Policy | Accessibility