Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
second_navbar.gif (585 bytes)
Past Issue

Vol. 5, No. 6
Nov–Dec  
 

Download Article
PDF
ASCII
Help
Feedback

Journal Information
About the Journal
Instructions to Authors
Suggested Citation

Other Journal Resources
Announcements
Translations
Image Library

Current Issue
Perspectives
Synopses
Research
Dispatches
Letters
News and Notes

Journal Quick Search

Enter Keywords:



Advanced search



Past Issues


Subscribe
To Subscribe to the EID Listserve to receive email notifications of Journal updates please click here.

For Subscriptions to hard copies...

More on Infectious Diseases
MMWR
Disease Information
Educational Materials

 

 

Synopsis

Antimicrobial Resistance with Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States, 1997–98

Gary V. Doern, Angela B. Brueggemann, Holly Huynh, Elizabeth Wingert, and Paul Rhomberg
University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA


From November 1997 to April 1998, 1,601 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were obtained from 34 U.S. medical centers. The overall rate of strains showing resistance to penicillin was 29.5%, with 17.4% having intermediate resistance. Multidrug resistance, defined as lack of susceptibility to penicillin and at least two other non-ß-lactam classes of antimicrobial drugs, was observed in 16.0% of isolates. Resistance to all 10 ß-lactam drugs examined in this study was directly related to the level of penicillin resistance. Penicillin resistance rates were highest in isolates from middle ear fluid and sinus aspirates of children <5 years of age and from patients in ambulatory-care settings. Twenty-four of the 34 medical centers in this study had participated in a similar study 3 years before. In 19 of these 24 centers, penicillin resistance rates increased 2.9% to 39.2%. Similar increases were observed with rates of resistance to other antimicrobial drugs.

Before 1990, most clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States were susceptible to a variety of antimicrobial drugs, including penicillin (1,2). In the early 1990s, however, antimicrobial resistance began to emerge (3-7), and ß-lactam resistance as a result of altered penicillin binding proteins was recognized (8-11). Resistance to other non-ß-lactam drugs, such as the macrolides, clindamycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), began to increase (4-6). Therapeutic failures in patients with pneumococcal infections treated with previously effective drugs were reported (12).

During November 1994 through April 1995, we assessed the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance with S. pneumoniae at 30 U.S. medical centers (4). Among 1,527 isolates of S. pneumoniae, 14.1% had intermediate resistance, and 9.5% were fully resistant to penicillin. Aggregate rates of intermediate and high penicillin resistance were 2.1% to 52.9%. In addition, high rates of resistance were noted with other antimicrobial drugs.

From November 1997 to April 1998, we surveyed 34 U.S. medical centers to assess changes in antimicrobial resistance rates with S. pneumoniae during the 3 years since the 1994-95 study. Twenty-four of these centers had also participated in the earlier investigation. Similar patient populations were sampled, and identical test methods were used. In addition, we assessed the relationship between various demographic factors and resistance and undertook a systematic analysis of multidrug resistance. Finally, macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance was characterized at a molecular level.

 

The Study

From November 1, 1997, to April 30, 1998, 1,601 isolates of S. pneumoniae were recovered in 34 U.S. medical centers. All isolates included in this study were from consecutive patients. With the exception of specimens from the lower respiratory tract, all isolates were from normally sterile body sites (i.e., blood, cerebrospinal fluid, middle ear fluid, sinus aspirates, pericardial fluid, and pleural fluid). Isolates from lower respiratory tract specimens were included only if they were of clinical significance.

In the study centers, isolates were subcultured onto 5% sheep blood agar plates and incubated overnight at 35°C to 37°C in 5% to 7% CO2. Colony growth was collected on a rayon swab and immediately immersed in a transport tube containing 12 ml of semisolid Ames transport medium with charcoal (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI). Transport tubes were then shipped overnight to the University of Iowa College of Medicine for additional analysis (Appendix). The recovery rate from this transport system was 100%. Twelve concentrations each of 23 antimicrobial drugs were tested against 1,601 isolates of S. pneumoniae.

Overall, 17.4% of isolates had intermediate and 12.1% had full resistance to penicillin (Table 1). Overall nonsusceptible rates with ceftriaxone and cefuroxime (intermediate plus fully resistant) were 14.9% and 23.3%, respectively. Because National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)-approved breakpoints are lacking for the six other cephalosporins examined in this study (cefpodoxime, cefixime, ceftibuten, cefprozil, cefaclor, and loracarbef), rates of resistance were not determined for these drugs. However, when MIC values were compared, cefpodoxime was the most active.

Comparison of MIC values of the three macrolides we examined showed that clarithromycin was consistently twice as active as erythromycin, which in turn was consistently twice as active as azithromycin (Table 1). Overall rates of resistance, however, based on NCCLS breakpoints, which differ for these agents, were similar (18%-19%).

 

Table 1. In vitro activity of 23 antimicrobial agents for 1,601 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae
 

Antimicrobial agent

Penicillin-susceptible strains (n = 1,127)

 

Penicillin-intermediate strains (n = 278)

MIC50 

MIC90

MIC range

% I

% R

MIC50

MIC90

MIC range

% I

% R

 

Penicillin

0.015 

0.03

<0.004 - 0.06

--

--

 

0.5

1

0.12 - 1

--

--

Amoxicillin

0.015 

0.03

<0.004 - 0.12

0.0

0.0

0.5

2

0.015 - 4

34.5

14

Amox/clav

0.015 

0.03

<0.004 - 0.12

0.0

0.0

0.5

2

0.015 - 4

31.7

16.9

Ceftriaxone

0.015

0.03

<0.008 - 0.5

0.0

0.0

0.5

1

0.015 - 4

20.1

0.7

Cefuroxime

0.03

0.12

<0.015 - 2

0.2

0.1

2

4

0.12 - 8

6.8

55.8

Cefpodoxime

0.03

0.06

<0.015 - 4

1

4

0.03 - 8

--

--

Cefprozil

0.06

0.12

<0.03 - 1

2

8

0.06 - 16

Cefixime

0.25

0.5

<0.06 - 16

8

16

0.25 - 32

Loracarbef

0.5

1

<0.06 - 4

16

128

0.25 - >128

Cefaclor

0.5

2

<0.06 - 2

8

64

0.12 - >128

Ceftibuten

4

8

<0.25 - >64

64

>64

4 - >64

Clarithromycin

<0.03

<0.03

<0.03 - >64

0.5

5.2

<0.03

>64

<0.03 - >64

2.2

35.3

Erythromycin

0.06

0.06

<0.03 - >64

0.3

5.7

0.06

>64

<0.03 - >64

0.7

37.4

Azithromycin

0.06

0.12

<0.03 - >64

0.2

5.6

0.12

>64

<0.03 - >64

0.7

37.8

Clindamycin

0.06

0.06

<0.008 - >8

0.1

1.1

0.06

>8

<0.008 - 8

0.0

12.9

Trovafloxacin

0.06

0.12

0.015 - 8

0.0

0.2

0.06

0.12

0.015 - 0.25

0.0

0.0

Tetracycline

0.12

0.25

<0.03 - 64

0.2

2.5

0.25

32

<0.03 - >64

0.7

27.7

TMP/SMX

0.12

1

0.06 - 32

6.5

5.9

2

8

<0.03 - >32

19.8

42.4

Chloramphenicol

2

4

<0.5 - 16

0.8

4

16

<0.05 - 16

11.9

Rifampin

<0.12

<0.12

<0.12 - 0.5

0.0

0.0

<0.12

<0.12

<0.12 - 2

0.7

0.0

Linezolida

1

2

0.12 - 2

1

2

0.25 - 2

Quin/dalfo

0.25

0.5

0.06 - 8

0.0

0.2

0.25

0.5

0.06 - 1

0.0

0.0

Vancomycin

0.25

0.5

0.03 - 0.5

0.0

0.0

0.25

0.5

0.06 - 0.5

0.0

0.0

 

Antimicrobial

Penicillin-resistant strains (n = 196) 

 

All strains (n = 1,601) 

agent

MIC50

MIC90

MIC range

% I

% R

MIC50

MIC90

MIC range

% I

% R

Penicillin

2

4

2 - 8

--

--

0.015

2

<0.004 - 8

17.4

12.1

Amoxicillin

2

8

1 - 8

9.7

90.3

0.03

2

<0.004 - 8

7.2

13.5

Amox/clav

2

8

1 - 8

6.6

93.4

0.03

2

<0.004 - 8

6.3

14.4

Ceftriaxone

1

2

0.5 - 8

68.4

31.6

0.03

1

<0.008 - 8

10.9

4

Cefuroxime

4

8

2 - 32

0.0

100

0.03

4

<0.015 - 32

1.3

22

Cefpodoxime

4

8

1 - >32

--

--

0.06

4

<0.05 - >32

--

Cefprozil

8

16

2 - 64

0.12

8

<0.03 - 64

--

Cefixime

32

64

2 - 128

0.25

16

<0.06 - 128

--

Loracarbef

128

>128

32 - >128

1

128

<0.06 - >128

--

Cefaclor

128

>128

16 - >128

0.5

64

<0.06 - >128

--

Ceftibuten

>64

>64

<16 - >64

44

>64

<0.25 - >64

Clarithromycin

2

>64

<0.03 - >64

3.6

64.8

<0.03

4

<0.03 - >64

1.2

17.7

Erythromycin

4

>64

<0.03 - >64

0.5

68.4

0.06

8

<0.03 - >64

0.4

18.9

Azithromycin

8

>64

<0.03 - >64

1.5

67.3

0.12

16

<0.03 - >64

0.4

18.7

Clindamycin

0.06

>8

<0.008 - >8

0.5

21.4

0.06

0.06

<0.008 - >8

0.1

5.6

Trovafloxacin

0.06

0.12

0.03 - 4

0.5

0.5

0.06

0.12

0.015 - 8

0.1

0.2

Tetracycline

16

32

0.06 - 64

0.5

51.5

0.12

16

<0.03 - >64

0.3

12.9

TMP/SMX

4

16

0.06 - 32

21.9

71.9

0.25

4

<0.03 - 32

10.7

20.4

Chloramphenicol

4

16

<0.5 - >16

37.2

2

4

<0.5 - >16

7.2

Rifampin

<0.12

<0.12

<0.12 - >4

0.0

0.5

<0.12

<0.12

<0.12 - >4

0.1

0.1

Linezolid

1

2

0.5 - 2

1

2

0.12 - 2

--

Quin/dalfo

0.25

0.5

0.12 1

0.0

0.0

0.25

0.5

0.06 - 8

0.0

0.1

Vancomycin

0.25

0.5

0.06 - 0.5

0.0

0.0

0.25

0.5

0.03 - 0.5

0.0

0.0

aBecause of the lack of NCCLS breakpoints for linezolid, resistance rates were not determined. 
Amox/clav, amoxicillin/clavulanate; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; Quin/dalfo, quinupristin/dalfopristin.  
MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; I, intermediate resistance; R, resistant.

 

 

Compared with erythromycin as an indicator of macrolide activity, 302 (18.9%) isolates had MICs >1 µg/ml and thus were classified as resistant (Table 1). Among these, 217 (71.9%) had erythromycin MICs <32 µg/ml; the remaining 85 strains (28.1%) had erythromycin MICs >64 µg/ml. Of the 217 strains with erythromycin MICs <32, 214 had clindamycin MICs <0.25 and thus were categorized as clindamycin susceptible. Thirty-five of these strains, randomly selected, were examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of ermAM and mefE genes. Of the 85 strains with erythromycin MICs >64 µg/ml, 83 had clindamycin MICs >8. Thirty-eight of these isolates, chosen randomly, were ermAM positive; 12 were also positive for mefE (Table 2). Five resistant strains were also characterized for the presence of macrolide resistance determinants (Table 2). Finally, the three isolates (Table 2) negative for both the ermAM and mefE genes were also negative by PCR for other known determinants of macrolide/lincosamide resistance in gram-positive bacteria (ermA, ermC, ereA, ereB, msrA, and linA genes).

 

Table 2. Characterization of 302 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates that were erythromycin resistant (MICs 1> µg/ml)

Erythromycin    No. of No. with clindamycin MICs of

MIC 

 strains   0.25

0.5

1

2

8


15  15a

0

0

0

0

2  

52 51b

0

0

0

1c

53  53d

0

0

0

0

68  68e

0

0

0

0

16 

23  22f

1g

0

0

0

32 

5h

0

0

0

1i

64 

85  0

0

1j

1k

83l


aFour isolates characterized for ermAM and mefE; all four ermAM-/mefE+.
b
Seven isolates characterized; all seven ermAM-/mefE+.
c
This isolate was ermAM+/mefE-.
d
Seven isolates characterized; one ermAM-/mefE-; six ermAM-/mefE+.
e
Seven isolates characterized; all seven ermAM-/mefE+
f
Four isolates characterized; all four ermAM-/mefE+.
gThis isolate was ermAM-/mefE-.
hThree isolates characterized; all ermAM-/mefE+.
iThis isolate was ermAM+/mefE-.
jThis isolate was ermAM-/mefE+.
kThis isolate was ermAM-/mefE-.
lThirty-eight of these isolates were characterized; 26 were ermAM+/mefE-; 12 were ermAM+/mefE+.

Of the 1,601 isolates examined, one had intermediate resistance to trovafloxacin with an MIC 2 µg/ml; three strains (0.2%) were resistant, two with trovafloxacin MICs 4 µg/ml and one with a trovafloxacin MIC 8 µg/ml. The single strain with intermediate resistance had a ciprofloxacin MIC of 16 and an asp83tyr substitution in the C subunit of topoisomerase IV, as well as a ser84tyr substitution in the A subunit of DNA gyrase. The three trovafloxacin-resistant strains had ciprofloxacin MICs >32 µg/ml and a ser79phe substitution in the C subunit of topoisomerase, as well as a ser84phe substitution in the A subunit of DNA gyrase. None of these four strains had detectable mutations in the QRDR of par E.

Overall rates of resistance, expressed as the percentage of isolates intermediate or resistant, for selected other agents are described in Table 1: tetracycline, 13.2%, TMP/SMX, 31.1%, chloramphenicol, 7.2%, and rifampin, 0.2%. Linezolid was uniformly active over a narrow range of MICs (i.e., 0.12 to 2 µg/ml). Two strains among the 1,601 examined in this study were resistant to quinupristin/dalfopristin; one had an MIC 4 µg/ml and the other 8 µg/ml. Vancomycin was uniformly active against the 1,601 isolates of S. pneumoniae in this survey, with MICs <0.5 µg/ml.

The in vitro activity of all ß-lactams (penicillins, ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cephalosporins), macrolides, clindamycin, tetracycline, TMP/SMX, and chloramphenicol was lowest with high-level penicillin-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae and greatest with penicillin-susceptible isolates. This trend was not apparent with linezolid, trovafloxacin, rifampin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, or vancomycin.

The prevalence of resistance to selected agents was assessed according to the specimen source of isolates, the patient's age, and the health-care setting (Table 3). In general, the highest resistance rates for all antimicrobial drugs were observed in middle ear fluid and sinus aspirate isolates and in isolates from patients <5 years old and from patients seen in ambulatory-care settings.

 

Table 3. Recovery of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains with intermediate and high levels of resistance, by specimen source and patient characteristics 

Characteristic

Total no. of isolates

No. (%) of resistant isolates for the following antimicrobial drugs

Penicillin

Ceftriaxone

Erythromycin

Tetracycline

TMP/SMX Chloramphenicol

I

R

I

R

I

R

I

R

I

R

I

R

Specimen sourcea

LRT 

773 

144

103

91

36

5

152

1

116

89

149

--

67

(18.6)

(13.3)

(11.8)

(4.7)

(0.6)

(20.9)

(0.1)

(15.0)

(11.5)

(19.3)

 

(8.7)

Blood 

509 

68

41

35

16

1

59

2

33

40

87

--

17

(13.4)

(8.1)

(6.9)

(3.1)

(0.2)

(11.6)

(0.4)

(6.5)

(7.9)

(17.1)

 

(3.3)

URT 

238 

50

48

44

11

0

77

2

53

28

74

--

28

(21.0)

(20.2)

(18.5)

(4.6)

(0.0)

(32.4)

(0.8)

(22.3)

(11.8)

(31.1)

 

(11.8)

BF/CSF 

60 

12

3

4

1

0

9

0

3

1

13

--

2

(20.0)

(5.0)

(6.7)

(1.7)

(0.0)

(15.0)

(0.0)

(5.0)

(1.7)

(21.7)

 

(3.3)

Other 

21 

4

1

1

0

0

5

0

1

2

3)

--

1

(19.0)

(4.8)

(4.8)

(0.0)

(0.0)

(23.8)

(0.0)

(4.8)

(9.5)

(14.3)

 

(4.8)

 

Age group (years)

<5

432

88

79

72

23

1

115

3

71

62

128

--

42

(20.4)

(18.3)

(16.7)

(5.3)

(0.2)

(26.6)

(0.7)

(16.4)

(14.4)

(29.6)

 

(9.7)

6-20

97

14

6

6

1

0

12

0

11

11

14

--

4

(14.4)

(6.2)

(6.2)

(1.0)

(0.0)

(12.4)

(0.0)

(11.3)

(11.3)

(14.4)

 

(4.1)

21-50

407

76

42

39

18

2

71

0

56

32

80

--

22

(18.7)

(10.6)

(9.6)

(4.4)</