| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 12, Number 1, January 2006 SARS–associated Coronavirus Replication in Cell LinesMatthew Kaye,* Julian Druce,* Thomas Tran,* Renata Kostecki,* Doris
Chibo,* Jessica Morris,* Mike Catton,* and Chris Birch* |
||
|
|
![]() |
|
| Back to article | |
|
Figure 2. Cycle threshold (Ct) changes measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction versus days after infection of the indicated cell lines. The cell-free sample had an initial Ct of 31, which rose to 40 by day 11. Reductions in the Ct or flat-line Ct values (e.g., COS cells) indicate replication of the virus. Continued increases in Ct above the initial value of 31 by days 7 and 11 indicate failure to replicate. |
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
This page last reviewed December 1, 2005 |
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|