| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 11, Number 8, August 2005 West Nile Virus Detection in UrineJessica H. Tonry,* Craig B. Brown,† Cecil B. Cropp,* Juliene K.G.
Co,* Shannon N. Bennett,* Vivek R. Nerurkar,* Timothy Kuberski,‡ and Duane
J. Gubler* |
||
|
|
![]() |
|
| Back to article | |
|
Figure. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree showing the phylogenetic relationships between West Nile virus (WNV) urine sample Arizona JW 2004 (italicized and underlined) and previously published WNV strains based on capsid/prM gene junction (356 bp). Samples are coded by location, strain, and year of isolation. Locations include France (FR); Kunjin (Kunj); Romania (Rom); Russia (Russ); Tunisia (Tun); Uganda (Ugda); Volgograd, Russia (Vlgd); and the US states of New York (NY), Texas (TX), New Jersey (NJ), Maryland (MD), and Connecticut (CN). Support indicated above and below nodes are bootstrap values (1,000 neighbor-joining replicates using the ML model of evolution) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (Bayesian MCMC [Metropolis-Hastings Markov chain Monte Carlo tree sampling] for 4 chains length 2 × 106, sample frequency 100, with a 2,000-tree burn-in), respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
This page last reviewed June 22, 2005 |
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|