| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 9, Number 2, February 2003 Annual Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Risk and Interpretation of Clustering StatisticsEmilia Vynnycky,* Martien
W. Borgdorff,† Dick van Soolingen,‡ and Paul E.M. Fine* |
||
|
|
![]() |
|
| Back to article | |
|
Figure 6. Summary of model predictions of the A) positive predictive values of clustering (proportion of cases who are in a cluster who have been infected or reinfected <5 years before onset) and B) negative predictive values of clustering (proportion of cases who are not in a cluster who are experiencing disease as a result of infection or reinfection acquired 5 years before onset) in different age groups in the Netherlands and in settings in which the annual risk for infection has remained unchanged over time at 0.1%, 1%, and 3%. |
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
This page last reviewed March 20, 2003 |
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|