 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 12, Number 5, May 2006 The Trojan Chicken Study, MinnesotaSandra R. Olson*† and Gregory C. Gray* |
|
|
|
 |
|
| Back to article | |
|
Figure. A) UV light box for screening hands for evidence of contamination with fluorescent dye; B) example of fluorescence on contaminated hands; C) stacked poultry in cages at a county fair; D) poultry judge moved from cage to cage, handling each bird and passing bird to exhibitor. |
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
This page last reviewed April 18, 2006 |
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|