
|
 |
Research
Isoniazid Preventive Therapy
and Risk for Resistant Tuberculosis
Maria Elvira Balcells,*1 Sara L. Thomas,*
Peter Godfrey-Faussett,* and Alison D. Grant*
*London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
Suggested
citation for this article
|
Table 3. Studies comparing isoniazid treatment
with no treatment in HIV-infected populations*
|
|
|
Author, country, dates
|
Population
|
Intervention/ comparison; blinding
|
Enrolled (n) INH/control
|
Follow up; loss to follow-up; overall
or INH vs. control
|
TB cases: culture positive/total (%)
|
Definition of INH resistance
|
Resistant cases/total tested (% culture
positive tested)
|
Risk for resistant TB/1,000
|
RR (95% CI)
|
|
|
|
|
INH
|
Controls
|
INH
|
Controls
|
INH
|
Controls
|
|
|
Randomized controlled trials
|
|
Gordin, USA, 1991–1996 (30)
|
Clinic attendees; med. CD4 233/247
|
6 mo INH 300 mg daily vs. placebo;
double blind
|
260/257
|
34 mo/33 mo; 6.2% vs. 7%
|
NS/3
|
NS/6
|
NS
|
0/3 (NS)
|
0/5 (NS)
|
1.92†
|
1.94†
|
0.99 (0.06–6,298.19)
|
|
Hawken, Kenya, 1992–1997 (31)
|
Clinic or VCT attendees; med. CD4 321.5/346
|
6 mo INH 300 mg daily/placebo; double
blind
|
342/342
|
Med. 1.83 y (range 0–3.41); 32% vs.
27.3% not seen in final 6 m
|
19/25 (76)
|
22/23 (95.7)
|
Growth on 0.2 μg/mL INH >1%
growth on control medium
|
2/17 (90)
|
0/21 (96)
|
10.05†
|
1.46†
|
6.88 (0.01–3,882.85)
|
|
Mwinga, Zambia, 1992–1996 (33)
|
VCT attendees
|
6 mo INH 900 mg twice weekly/placebo;
double blind
|
350/352
|
Med. 1.8 y; 32.4% vs. 30.3% not seen
in final 6 m
|
NS/27
|
NS/44
|
NS
|
0/3 (NS)
|
1/5 (NS)
|
1.43†
|
26.38†
|
0.05 (0.00–30.47)
|
|
Johnson, Uganda, 1993–NS (34)
|
Clinic or counseling attendees
|
6 mo INH 300 mg daily/placebo; partially
double blind‡
|
931/787
|
Mean 2 y/1.6 y (PPD+/anergic); 16.1%
vs. 30.6%
|
36/51 (70.6)
|
46/64 (71.9)
|
Growth on 0.1 μg/mL INH (BACTEC
radiometric method) >1% growth on control medium
|
5/20 (56)
|
1/24 (52)
|
13.69
|
3.39
|
4.04 (0.50–32.80)
|
|
Rivero, Spain, 1994–2000 (35)
|
Clinic attendees; med. CD4 193/215
|
6 mo INH 300 mg daily/no treatment;
not blind
|
82/77
|
24 mo; 26.8% vs. 7.8%
|
3/3 (100)
|
4/4 (100)
|
NS
|
3/3 (100)
|
4/4 (100)
|
36.59
|
51.95
|
0.70 (0.16–3.05)
|
|
|
Cohort study
|
|
Moreno, Spain, 1985–1994 (32)
|
Clinic attendees; med. CD4 689/648
|
9–12 mo INH (dose NS)/no treatment;
not blind
|
29/92
|
89 mo vs. 60 mo; NS
|
3/3 (100)
|
39/43 (90.7)
|
Growth on 0.2 μg/mL INH >1%
growth on control medium
|
2/2 (67)
|
0/12 (31)
|
118.64†
|
5.41†
|
21.95 (0.04–11,582.31)
|
|
|
*INH, isoniazid; TB, tuberculosis; RR, relative
risk; CI, confidence interval; med., median; NS, not stated; Rx,
treatment; VCT, voluntary counseling and testing; PPD, purified
protein derivative.
|
|
†Calculated by adding 0.5 to numerator and denominator
of both groups.
|
|
‡Unclear whether isoniazid and placebo group received
the same number of tablets.
|
1Current affiliation: Department of Medicine,
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Suggested citation
for this article:
Balcells ME, Thomas
SL, Godfrey-Faussett P, Grant AD. Isoniazid preventive therapy and risk
for resistant tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet].
2006 May [date cited]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no05/05-0681.htm
|