
|
 |
Research
Isoniazid Preventive Therapy
and Risk for Resistant Tuberculosis
Maria Elvira Balcells,*1 Sara L. Thomas,*
Peter Godfrey-Faussett,* and Alison D. Grant*
*London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
Suggested
citation for this article
|
Table 2. Studies comparing isoniazid treatment
with no treatment in HIV-uninfected populations*
|
|
|
Author, country, dates
|
Population
|
Intervention/comparison; blinding
|
Enrolled (n) INH/control
|
Follow-up; loss to follow-up; overall
or INH vs. control
|
TB cases: culture positive/total (%)
|
Definition of INH resistance
|
Resistant cases/total tested (% culture
positive tested)
|
Risk for resistant TB/1,000
|
RR (95% CI)
|
|
|
|
|
INH
|
Controls
|
INH
|
Controls
|
INH
|
Controls
|
|
|
Ferebee, USA, 1957–NS (18)
|
Household contacts of TB patients
|
12 mo INH, 4–7 mg/kg/day/placebo; double
blind
|
7,755/7,996
|
<10 y; 5.2% vs. 4.9% during Rx
|
NS/86
|
NS/215
|
>50 colonies growth in 0.2 μg/mL
INH
|
2/10 NS
|
2/31 NS
|
2.22
|
1.73
|
1.28 (0.20–8.07)
|
|
Katz, USA, 1958–1964 (19)
|
Mental hospital patients with inactive
lesions
|
2 y INH, 300 mg daily/no treatment;
not blind
|
118/107
|
<4 y post-Rx; 30.6% overall†
|
NS/9
|
NS/10
|
Resistance to >0.25 γ
INH
|
1/1 NS
|
2/5 NS
|
76.27
|
37.38
|
2.04 (0.52–8.08)
|
|
Horwitz, Greenland, 1956–1963 (20)
|
76 villages
|
2 × 13 wk INH, 400 mg twice weekly/0.1
mg INH; double blind
|
4,174/3,907
|
6 y; NS
|
123/238 (51.7)
|
186/323 (57.6)
|
(a) > 1 colony at >0.32
μg/mL INH
|
(a) 2/46
|
(a) 5/66
|
(a) 2.48
|
(a) 6.26
|
(a) 0.40 (0.08–1.97)
|
|
(b) Equal to control tube at >0.32
μg/mL INH
|
(b) 2/46 (37)
|
(b) 1/66 (36)
|
(b) 2.48
|
(b) 1.25
|
(b) 1.98 (0.18–21.31)
|
|
Comstock, USA (Alaska), 1957–1964 (21)
|
Residents of 28 villages and 2 boarding
schools
|
12 mo INH, 300 mg§ daily/placebo; double
blind
|
3,047/3,017
|
Med.: 69.3 mo (range 43–76 mo); 5.3%
observed for <40 mo
|
NS/58
|
NS/141
|
NS
|
4/20 NS
|
1/50 NS
|
3.81
|
0.93
|
4.07 (0.47–34.98)
|
|
Ferebee, USA, 1960–1967 (9)
|
Persons with inactive lesions
|
12 mo INH, 5 m g/kg/day/placebo; NS
|
701/714
|
5 y; 2.2% by 1967
|
NS/18
|
NS/49
|
>50 colonies growth in 0.2 μg/mL
INH
|
2/5 NS
|
2/25 NS
|
10.27
|
5.49
|
1.87 (0.31–11.19)
|
|
Pamra, India, 1958–1968 (22)
|
X-ray screening attendees with inactive
TB
|
12 mo INH, 3–4 mg/kg/day/placebo; NS
|
139/178
|
<5 y post-Rx; 8.6% vs. 11.2%
|
10/18 (55.6)
|
57/76 (75)
|
Growth on 1 μg/mL INH
|
3/9 (90)
|
6/52 (91)
|
43.17
|
49.27
|
0.88 (0.24–3.15)
|
|
Hong Kong Chest Service, Hong Kong, 1981–1987 (27)
|
Men with silicosis
|
24 wk INH, 300 mg daily/placebo;double
blind
|
167/159
|
2–5 y; 15.8% at 5 y
|
19/25 (76)
|
29/36 (80.6)
|
>20 colonies in >1
culture at >0.2 mg/L INH
|
5/19 (100)
|
4/28 (97)
|
39.39
|
32.35
|
1.22 (0.34–4.32)
|
|
|
*INH, isoniazid; TB, tuberculosis; RR, relative
risk; CI, confidence interval; NS, not stated; med., median; Rx,
treatment.
|
|
†(a), definition of resistance as >1 colony
growth at >0.32 μg/mL INH.
|
|
‡(b), definition of resistance as growth equal to
control tube at >0.32 μg/mL INH.
|
|
§Children were given 5 mg/kg/day INH.
|
1Current affiliation: Department of Medicine,
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Suggested citation
for this article:
Balcells ME, Thomas
SL, Godfrey-Faussett P, Grant AD. Isoniazid preventive therapy and risk
for resistant tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet].
2006 May [date cited]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no05/05-0681.htm
|