Skip Standard Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
Past Issue

Vol. 12, No. 5
May 2006

EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript

Comments Comments | Email this article Email this article



Back to article

Research

Isoniazid Preventive Therapy and Risk for Resistant Tuberculosis

Maria Elvira Balcells,*1 Sara L. Thomas,* Peter Godfrey-Faussett,* and Alison D. Grant*Comments
*London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

Suggested citation for this article



Table 2. Studies comparing isoniazid treatment with no treatment in HIV-uninfected populations*


Author, country, dates

Population

Intervention/comparison; blinding

Enrolled (n) INH/control

Follow-up; loss to follow-up; overall or INH vs. control

TB cases: culture positive/total (%)

Definition of INH resistance

Resistant cases/total tested (% culture positive tested)

Risk for resistant TB/1,000

RR (95% CI)




INH

Controls

INH

Controls

INH

Controls


Ferebee, USA, 1957–NS (18)

Household contacts of TB patients

12 mo INH, 4–7 mg/kg/day/placebo; double blind

7,755/7,996

<10 y; 5.2% vs. 4.9% during Rx

NS/86

NS/215

>50 colonies growth in 0.2 μg/mL INH

2/10 NS

2/31 NS

2.22

1.73

1.28 (0.20–8.07)

Katz, USA, 1958–1964 (19)

Mental hospital patients with inactive lesions

2 y INH, 300 mg daily/no treatment; not blind

118/107

<4 y post-Rx; 30.6% overall†

NS/9

NS/10

Resistance to >0.25 γ INH

1/1 NS

2/5 NS

76.27

37.38

2.04 (0.52–8.08)

Horwitz, Greenland, 1956–1963 (20)

76 villages

2 × 13 wk INH, 400 mg twice weekly/0.1 mg INH; double blind

4,174/3,907

6 y; NS

123/238 (51.7)

186/323 (57.6)

(a) > 1 colony at >0.32 μg/mL INH

(a) 2/46

(a) 5/66

(a) 2.48

(a) 6.26

(a) 0.40 (0.08–1.97)

(b) Equal to control tube at >0.32 μg/mL INH

(b) 2/46 (37)

(b) 1/66 (36)

(b) 2.48

(b) 1.25

(b) 1.98 (0.18–21.31)

Comstock, USA (Alaska), 1957–1964 (21)

Residents of 28 villages and 2 boarding schools

12 mo INH, 300 mg§ daily/placebo; double blind

3,047/3,017

Med.: 69.3 mo (range 43–76 mo); 5.3% observed for <40 mo

NS/58

NS/141

NS

4/20 NS

1/50 NS

3.81

0.93

4.07 (0.47–34.98)

Ferebee, USA, 1960–1967 (9)

Persons with inactive lesions

12 mo INH, 5 m g/kg/day/placebo; NS

701/714

5 y; 2.2% by 1967

NS/18

NS/49

>50 colonies growth in 0.2 μg/mL INH

2/5 NS

2/25 NS

10.27

5.49

1.87 (0.31–11.19)

Pamra, India, 1958–1968 (22)

X-ray screening attendees with inactive TB

12 mo INH, 3–4 mg/kg/day/placebo; NS

139/178

<5 y post-Rx; 8.6% vs. 11.2%

10/18 (55.6)

57/76 (75)

Growth on 1 μg/mL INH

3/9 (90)

6/52 (91)

43.17

49.27

0.88 (0.24–3.15)

Hong Kong Chest Service, Hong Kong, 1981–1987 (27)

Men with silicosis

24 wk INH, 300 mg daily/placebo;double blind

167/159

2–5 y; 15.8% at 5 y

19/25 (76)

29/36 (80.6)

>20 colonies in >1 culture at >0.2 mg/L INH

5/19 (100)

4/28 (97)

39.39

32.35

1.22 (0.34–4.32)


*INH, isoniazid; TB, tuberculosis; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; NS, not stated; med., median; Rx, treatment.

†(a), definition of resistance as >1 colony growth at >0.32 μg/mL INH.

‡(b), definition of resistance as growth equal to control tube at >0.32 μg/mL INH.

§Children were given 5 mg/kg/day INH.

 

1Current affiliation: Department of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

 

Suggested citation for this article:
Balcells ME, Thomas SL, Godfrey-Faussett P, Grant AD. Isoniazid preventive therapy and risk for resistant tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2006 May [date cited]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no05/05-0681.htm

   
     
   
Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Alison D. Grant, Clinical Research Unit, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK; email: alison.grant@lshtm.ac.uk

Please note: To prevent email errors, please use no web addresses, email addresses, HTML code, or the characters <, >, and @ in the body of your message.

Return email address optional:


 


Comments to the EID Editors
Please contact the EID Editors at eideditor@cdc.gov

Email this article

Please note: To prevent email errors, please use no web addresses, email addresses, HTML code, or the characters <, >, and @ in the body of your message.

Your email:

Your friend's email:

Message (optional):

 

 

 

EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page posted April 5, 2006
This page last reviewed April 14, 2006

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention