Skip Standard Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
Past Issue

Vol. 11, No. 8
August 2005

Adobe Acrobat logo

EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript

Comments Comments



Description of the Clog-log model
References
Back to article

Research

Sheep Feed and Scrapie, France

Sandrine Philippe,* Christian Ducrot,† Pascal Roy,‡ Laurent Remontet,‡ Nathalie Jarrige,* and Didier Calavas*Comments
*Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments, Lyon, France; †Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Theix, France; and ‡Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France


Appendix

Description of the Clog-log model

This appendix provides a description of the statistic model, a generalized linear model for binary outcome with the complementary log-log link function, used to assess the associations between flock status and risk factors. The construction is based on the probability (P) for a sheep flock to be qualified as an "infected scrapie flock," assuming independence and equiprobability for animals of a same flock to be infected by scrapie. This probability is equal to

where k is the flock size and p the probability for an animal of the flock to be diagnosed infected by scrapie. Then, applying the complementary log-log function (Clog-log) on P, the quantity below was obtained.

Therefore, the use of Clog-log as the link function (1) leads to model the probability to be infected at the animal level instead of at the flock level. In this model, flock size is introduced through the offset "Log(k)".

where Xj, j∈{1, …, q} is the vector of covariates. Moreover, if X1 and X2 are two exposure variables, then

For values of p smaller than 10%,  and  are very close. Hence, for small values of p,

.

The parameters estimated from the complementary log-log model can be interpreted as those from a logistic model. The appropriate coding of exposure (X = 1) and nonexposure (X = 0) provides an easy interpretation of the parameters with OR = exp(β) and IC95% = [exp(β) +/- zα/2 s.e.(β)], zα/2 being issued from the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution, and s.e. (β) being the standard error of parameter β (2,3).

References

  1. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman and Hall; 1989.
  2. Allard R. A family of mathematical models to describe the risk of infection by a sexually transmitted agent. Epidemiology. 1990;1:30–3.
  3. Shiboski S, Padian NS. Population- and individual-based approaches to the design and analysis of epidemiologic studies of sexually transmitted disease transmission. J Infect Dis. 1996;174(Suppl 2):S188–200.
   
     
   
Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Didier Calavas, Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments, 31 av. Tony Garnier, F69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France; fax: 33-4-78-61-91-45; email: d.calavas@lyon.afssa.fr

Please note: To prevent email errors, please use no web addresses, email addresses, HTML code, or the characters <, >, and @ in the body of your message.

Return email address optional:


 


Comments to the EID Editors
Please contact the EID Editors at eideditor@cdc.gov

 

EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page posted July 12, 2005
This page last reviewed July 19, 2005

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention