| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 11, Number 3, March 2005 Longitudinally Profiling Neutralizing Antibody Response to SARS Coronavirus with PseudotypesNigel J. Temperton,* Paul K. Chan,† Graham Simmons,‡ Maria C. Zambon,§
Richard S. Tedder,* Yasuhiro Takeuchi,* and Robin A. Weiss* |
||
|
|
![]() |
|
| Back to article | |
|
Figure 3. Severe acute respiratory syndrome–associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) neutralizing antibody–positive rate by time of blood sample collection (days after onset of fever). Black bars represent the number of patients tested for neutralizing antibodies (Nab). White bars represent the number of patients whose assayed samples were positive for neutralizing antibodies (Nab+). Samples are considered positive for Nab if the 90% neutralizing antibody titer determined by using murine leukemia virus (MLV) (SARS) pseudotypes is >10. Line plot with open white circles shows the geometric mean (GM) Nab titer within each time frame. IC90, 90% inhibitory concentration. |
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
This page last reviewed February 14, 2005 |
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|