| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 11, Number 3, March 2005 Longitudinally Profiling Neutralizing Antibody Response to SARS Coronavirus with PseudotypesNigel J. Temperton,* Paul K. Chan,† Graham Simmons,‡ Maria C. Zambon,§
Richard S. Tedder,* Yasuhiro Takeuchi,* and Robin A. Weiss* |
||
|
|
![]() |
|
| Back to article | |
|
Figure 2. Correlation of neutralizing antibody titers measured by plaque reduction assay with titers measured with pseudotype assay. LV, neutralizing antibody titer by using replication-competent severe acute respiratory syndrome–associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) (live virus); PV, neutralizing antibody titer by using pseudotype virus; PV90 (filled black diamonds), 90% neutralizing antibody titer by using murine leukemia virus (MLV) (SARS) pseudotype virus; PV50 (open squares), 50% neutralizing antibody titer. Logarithmic trendlines were fitted to the data by using Microsoft Excel 2003 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). Correlation coefficients for LV versus PV90 and LV versus PV50 are 0.69 and 0.78, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
This page last reviewed February 14, 2005 |
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|