| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 10, Number 6, June 2004 Candida parapsilosis Characterization in an Outbreak SettingDuncan M. Kuhn,* Pranab K. Mukherjee,* Thomas A. Clark,† Claude Pujol,‡
Jyotsna Chandra,* Rana A. Hajjeh,† David W. Warnock,† David R. Soll,‡
and Mahmoud A. Ghannoum* |
||
|
|
![]() |
|
| Back to article | |
|
Figure 5. Secretory aspartic protease (SAP) expression by Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates. Panel A shows representative sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of various C. parapsilosis isolates. M, molecular weight marker lane; BSA, bovine serum albumin alone; other lanes show number of isolate; and +, supernatant plus protease inhibitor cocktail. Protease activity is evident from the appearance of lower molecular weight bands representing cleavage products. Thick arrow indicates the 20-kDa protein appearing after protease digestion. (For details of methods used see text.) Panel B shows densitometric scanning analysis of SAP activity. Strains 177 and 179 were included to demonstrate the heterogeneity in SAP production within the clonal strains. Cath, catheter; Bld, bloodstream; Spt, sputum; Hnd, hand; Wnd, wound; Pdf, peritoneal dialysis fluid. |
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
This page last reviewed May 10, 2004 |
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|