| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 10, Number 6, June 2004 Candida parapsilosis Characterization in an Outbreak SettingDuncan M. Kuhn,* Pranab K. Mukherjee,* Thomas A. Clark,† Claude Pujol,‡
Jyotsna Chandra,* Rana A. Hajjeh,† David W. Warnock,† David R. Soll,‡
and Mahmoud A. Ghannoum* |
||
|
|
![]() |
|
| Back to article | |
|
Figure 3. Adherence properties of Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates. Graph shows adhesion ability of various C. parapsilosis strains, compared to strain 167 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Results were normalized to strain 167, which was taken as 100%. Each result is representative of at least two experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. *p < 0.001 for comparison of values of strain 167 vs. strains 313 and 385; all other comparisons had p values > 0.05. (For details of methods used, see text.) Cath, catheter; Bld, bloodstream; Spt, sputum; Hnd, hand; Wnd, wound; Pdf, peritoneal dialysis fluid. |
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
This page last reviewed May 10, 2004 |
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|