 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
Volume 10, Number 6, June 2004 Enhancing West Nile Virus Surveillance, United StatesJohn S. Brownstein,* Theodore R. Holford,* and Durland Fish* |
|
|
|
 |
|
| Back to article | |
|
Figure 2. Plots of West Nile virus (WNV) incidence by collections of virus-positive dead birds (A) and virus-positive mosquito pools (B). Log linear models fit to both surveillance systems considered alone are displayed. WNV-infected dead birds explain 2.5% of the variation in human incidence (A), whereas WNV-infected mosquito pools explain 38% (B). |
|
|
|
|
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
|
|
This page last reviewed May 21, 2004 |
|
|
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
|