Skip Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z

National Center for Environmental Health: Radiation Studies
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Radiation Studies Home
HTDS Guide

The Hanford Thyroid Disease Study
HTDS Guide > Findings and Interpretations > How the Prevalence of Thyroid Disease in the HTDS Compares to Other Populations

HTDS Guide

Findings and Interpretations
Section Summary
Study Objective
Findings
How the Prevalence of Thyroid Disease in the HTDS Compares to Other Populations
How the HTDS Findings Compare to Other Radiation Studies
How Reliable Are the Results of the HTDS?

How the Prevalence of Thyroid Disease in the HTDS Compares to Other Populations

People often ask how the occurrence of thyroid disease in the HTDS compares to other populations not exposed to iodine-131 from Hanford. Based on a descriptive analysis of the most comparable information from other studies, the HTDS research team found that the rates of thyroid disease in the study population are generally consistent with the published literature on other populations. In other words, there is no indication that the levels of disease in the HTDS population are any higher than what have been reported around the world in a variety of different circumstances.

There are a number of reasons why a more definitive comparison between the HTDS population and other populations groups is not possible:

> There are no national estimates of thyroid diseases to which the HTDS can be compared. Moreover, populations with different characteristics and different exposures may exhibit very different disease rates.
> Identification of thyroid disease in a population depends to a large extent on how aggressively one looks for the disease. For example, scientists are much more likely to detect thyroid nodules using ultrasound (such as the HTDS) than they would conducting a routine thyroid examination.
> Physicians use different definitions of various thyroid and other conditions, making it difficult to compare prevalence of diseases in different populations. Such is the case with both hyperparathyroidism and hypothyroidism.
> The methods used for detecting thyroid disease and other conditions have changed, making it difficult to compare studies conducted during different time periods. For example, estimates of the prevalence of autoimmune thyroiditis and thyroid nodules vary widely depending on the method of detection.

Nevertheless, the best estimates of the prevalence of thyroid diseases, including thyroid cancer, in the general population are consistent with that found in the HTDS population group.

Back to TopBack to Top    Next: How the HTDS Findings Compare
to Other Radiation Studies >>