Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail.
Motor-Vehicle Occupant Injury: Strategies for Increasing Use of Child Safety Seats, Increasing Use of Safety Belts, and Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving
A Report on Recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services
Task Force on Community Preventive Services*
Ross C. Brownson, Ph.D.
Mary Jane England, M.D.
Mindy Thompson Fullilove, M.D.
Fernando A. Guerra, M.D., M.P.H.
Alan R. Hinman, M.D., M.P.H.
George J. Isham, M.D.
Garland H. Land, M.P.H.
Charles S. Mahan, M.D.
Patricia Dolan Mullen, Dr.P.H.
Patricia A. Nolan, M.D., M.P.H.
Susan C. Scrimshaw, Ph.D.
Steven M. Teutsch, M.D., M.P.H.
Robert S. Thompson, M.D.
The Task Force on Community Preventive Services has conducted systematic reviews of interventions designed to increase use of child safety seats, increase use of safety belts, and reduce alcohol-impaired driving. The Task Force strongly recommends the following interventions: laws requiring use of child safety seats, distribution and education programs for child safety seats, laws requiring use of safety belts, both primary and enhanced enforcement of safety belt use laws, laws that lower the legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for adult drivers to 0.08%, laws that maintain the minimum legal drinking age at 21 years, and use of sobriety checkpoints. The Task Force recommends communitywide information and enforcement campaigns for use of child safety seats, incentive and education programs for use of child safety seats, and a lower legal BAC for young drivers (in the United States, those under the minimum legal drinking age). This report provides additional information regarding these recommendations, briefly describes how the reviews were conducted, and provides information to help apply the interventions locally.
Motor-vehicle--related injuries kill more children and young adults (i.e., those aged 1--24 years) than any other single cause in the United States (1,2) and are the leading cause of death from unintentional injury for persons of all ages (3,4). Approximately 41,000 persons in the United States die in motor-vehicle crashes each year (5). Moreover, crash injuries result in approximately 500,000 hospitalizations and 4 million emergency department visits annually (6).
Viewed from an economic perspective, crash injuries and deaths are a burden to society. Motor-vehicle--related deaths and injuries cost the United States approximately $150 billion annually (7,8), including $52.1 billion in property damage, $42.4 billion in lost productivity, and $17 billion in medical expenses (7). Alcohol-related crashes contribute substantially to these costs, with a direct economic impact of approximately $45 billion in 1994 alone (7).
Reducing motor-vehicle injury remains a formidable public health challenge, despite sharp declines in motor-vehicle--related death rates since 1925 (9). Use of child safety seats and safety belts and deterrence of alcohol-impaired driving are among the most important preventive measures to further reduce motor-vehicle occupant injuries and deaths (10,11). This report provides recommendations on interventions to increase use of child safety seats, increase use of safety belts, and reduce alcohol-impaired driving.
This MMWR report is the third to be completed for the Guide to Community Preventive Services (the Community Guide), a resource that will include multiple chapters, each focusing on a preventive health topic. The first two reports were on vaccine-preventable diseases and tobacco use prevention and reduction (12--17). This report provides an overview of the process used by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (the Task Force) to select and review evidence and summarizes the recommendations of the Task Force regarding interventions to reduce motor-vehicle occupant injury. A full report of the recommendations, supporting evidence (i.e., discussions of applicability, additional benefits, potential harms, existing barriers to implementation, and economic evaluations), and remaining research questions will be published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine later this year.
The independent, nonfederal Task Force is developing the Community Guide with the support of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) in collaboration with public and private partners. CDC provides staff support to the Task Force for development of the Community Guide. The recommendations in this report, although developed independently by the Task Force, are consistent with current CDC recommendations.
The Community Guide's methods for conducting systematic reviews and linking evidence to recommendations have been described elsewhere (18). In brief, for each Community Guide topic, a multidisciplinary team conducts a review by
For motor-vehicle occupant injury, the development team focused on interventions to promote use of child safety seats, promote use of safety belts, and deter alcohol-impaired driving. These areas were chosen because a) use of child safety seats and use of safety belts are below national goals (19); b) 38% of traffic deaths still involve alcohol (5); and c) nonuse of child safety seats, nonuse of safety belts, and alcohol-impaired driving are among the most important contributors to motor-vehicle occupant injuries, and reducing these three risk behaviors could dramatically reduce these injuries. This report includes the goals of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Healthy People 2010 initiative (19) in these areas (Table 1).
The consultation team** generated a comprehensive list of strategies and created a priority list of interventions for review based on a process of polling consultants and other specialists in the field regarding their perception of the importance and practicality of various interventions.
Interventions reviewed were either single-component (i.e., using only one activity to achieve desired outcomes) or multicomponent (i.e., using more than one related activity). Studies were grouped on the basis of the similarity of the interventions being evaluated. Some studies provided evidence for more than one intervention. In these cases, the studies were reviewed for each applicable intervention. Interventions and outcome measures were classified according to definitions developed as part of the review process. The nomenclature used here might differ from that used in the original studies.
To be included in the reviews of effectiveness, studies had to a) be primary investigations of interventions selected for evaluation rather than, for example, guidelines or reviews; b) be published in English during 1966--June 2000; c) be conducted in established market economies; and d) compare outcomes among groups of persons exposed to the intervention with outcomes among groups of persons not exposed or less exposed to the intervention (whether the comparison was concurrent between groups or before-after within groups).
For each intervention reviewed, the team developed an analytic framework indicating possible causal links between the intervention under study and predefined outcomes of interest. To make recommendations, the Task Force required that studies show increases in use of child safety seats or safety belts, decreases in alcohol-impaired driving, or decreases in motor-vehicle crashes or crash-related injuries. Improvements in behavioral outcomes (i.e., use of child safety seats, use of safety belts, and decreases in alcohol-impaired driving) are acceptable because
Each study that met the inclusion criteria was evaluated using a standardized abstraction form and assessed for suitability of the study design and threats to validity. On the basis of the number of threats to validity, studies were characterized as having good, fair, or limited execution (18,23). Results on each outcome of interest were obtained from each study that met the minimum quality criteria. For studies that reported multiple measures of a given outcome, the "best" measure with respect to validity and stability was chosen according to consistently applied rules. Measures that were adjusted for the effects of potential confounders were used in preference to crude effect measures. For studies in which such adjusted results were not provided, net effects were derived when possible by calculating the difference between the changes observed in the intervention and comparison groups. A median was calculated as a summary effect measure for each outcome of interest. For bodies of evidence consisting of seven or more studies, an interquartile range is presented as an index of vari-ability; otherwise, a simple range is reported.
The strength of the body of evidence of effectiveness was characterized as strong, sufficient, or insufficient on the basis of the number of available studies, the suitability of study designs for evaluating effectiveness, the quality of execution of the studies, the consistency of the results, and the effect size (18).
The Community Guide uses systematic reviews to evaluate the evidence of intervention effectiveness, and the Task Force makes recommendations based on the findings of these reviews (18). The strength of each recommendation is based on the strength of the evidence of effectiveness (e.g., an intervention is "strongly recommended" when there is strong evidence of effectiveness or "recommended" when there is sufficient evidence) (18). Other types of evidence can also affect a recommendation. For example, evidence of harms resulting from an intervention might lead to a recommendation that the intervention not be used if adverse effects outweigh improved outcomes. In general, the Task Force does not use economic information to modify recommendations.
A finding of insufficient evidence of effectiveness should not be seen as evidence of ineffectiveness. Such a finding is important for identifying areas of uncertainty and continuing research needs. In contrast, adequate evidence of ineffectiveness leads to a recommendation that the intervention not be used.
Searches of six computerized databases (i.e., Medline, Embase, EI Compendex, Sociological Abstracts, Psychlit, and Transportation Research Information Services [TRIS]***) yielded a list of 10,948 titles, from which 3,653 articles were retrieved as possibly relevant. Of these, 277 met the inclusion criteria. Team members also reviewed reference lists and consulted with other specialists in the field to identify relevant studies. All studies of economics, ethics, or feasibility that were applicable to the inter-ventions under study were also examined. Among all the studies reviewed, 102 were excluded on the basis of limitations in their execution or design or because they duplicated information provided in an already included study. Excluded studies were not considered further. The remaining 175 studies were considered qualifying studies. The 12 Task Force recommendations in this report are based on the systematic review and evaluation of these qualifying studies, all of which had good or fair quality of execution.
On the basis of the evidence of effectiveness, the Task Force either strongly recommended or recommended 11 of the 12 interventions evaluated (Table 2). These 11 include four interventions to increase use of child safety seats (i.e., laws requiring use, communitywide information and enhanced enforcement campaigns, distribution and education programs, and incentive and education programs), three interventions to increase safety belt use (i.e., laws requiring use, primary enforcement laws, and enhanced enforcement programs), and four interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving (i.e., 0.08% blood alcohol concentration [BAC] laws, lower BAC limit laws for young [in the United States, those under the minimum legal drinking age] and inexperienced drivers, laws requiring a minimum drinking age of 21 years, and sobriety checkpoint programs). The Task Force found insufficient evidence on which to make a recommendation regarding the 12th intervention --- education-only programs to improve child safety seat use --- because of inconsistencies in the curricula, target populations, and effects of reported interventions.
In addition to these 12 interventions, reviews for two additional interventions to prevent motor-vehicle occupant injury --- incentive programs to increase safety belt use and intervention training for servers of alcoholic beverages --- are underway and will be included in a subsequent report.
USE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN STATES AND COMMUNITIES
Given that motor-vehicle occupant injuries are the leading cause of death among persons aged 1--34 years in the United States (24), reducing the number of motor-vehicle crashes and crash-related occupant injuries should be relevant to most communities. States and communities can compare their current interventions and activities to prevent motor-vehicle injury with recommendations in this report, as well as with other relevant recommendations proposed by NHTSA (25), the National Transportation Safety Board**** (NTSB) (26), DHHS (19), the American Medical Association (27), and the American Academy of Pediatrics (28,29).
The Task Force recommendations can be used to support or expand child safety seat distribution programs, bolster the use of incentives, and employ enhanced enforcement campaigns, all in conjunction with communitywide education efforts. For example, the recommendation for child safety seat distribution and education programs could help a community decide to concentrate the distribution of low-cost or no-cost child safety seats in low-income neighborhoods or to seek local sponsorship to defray the costs of seats distributed to needy families. In selecting and implementing interventions, communities should strive to develop a comprehensive program to reduce motor-vehicle occupant injuries that includes legislation, enforcement, public education, training, and other community-oriented strategies. Improvements in each category will contribute to reductions in occupant-injury--related morbidity and mortality, and success in one area could contribute to improvements in the other areas.
The Task Force recommended or strongly recommended six state public health laws. Of these, three are in effect in all 50 states (i.e., laws requiring use of child safety seats, lower legal BAC for young or inexperienced drivers, and a minimum legal drinking age of 21 years). In addition, 49 states have laws requiring use of safety belts (New Hampshire has no such law).
Other laws reviewed by the Task Force were 0.08% BAC and primary enforcement safety belt laws. As of March 2001, 0.08% BAC laws had been enacted in 21 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, and primary enforcement laws were in effect in 17 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. In support of 0.08% BAC laws, the U.S. Congress included a provision in the 2001 Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act (30) requiring states to implement 0.08% BAC laws by fiscal year 2004 or risk losing federal highway construction funds.
The Task Force recommendations can be used to promote the adoption, maintenance, or strengthening of state or national laws or regulations. For example, at the state level, injury control program directors can use these recommendations to develop testimony regarding the evidence of effectiveness of different traffic safety laws for presentation to state legislatures. State legislators and their staff members can use the recommendations as they draft, debate, and vote on new or amended legislation. Advocacy and community groups can use the information to develop position statements regarding pending legislation at the state level. Health agencies can help educate the community regarding the importance and effectiveness of the laws and their enforcement.
Choosing effective interventions that are well-matched to state and local needs and capabilities, then carefully implementing those interventions, are vital steps in improving use of child safety seats and use of safety belts and in deterring alcohol-impaired driving. In setting priorities for the selection of interventions to meet local objectives, recommendations and other evidence provided in the Community Guide should be considered along with such local information as resource availability, administrative structures, and the economic, social, and regulatory environments of available organizations and practitioners. Involving other partners in these efforts could be useful. Examples of such partners are each state's Governor's Office of Highway Safety or local chapters of the National SAFE KIDS Campaign, available on the Internet at <http://www.safekids.org>; the National Safety Council, <http://www.nsc.org>; and Mothers Against Drunk Driving, <http://www.madd.org>. Additional information regarding applicability and economic information will be provided in the full report. Taking into consideration local goals and resources, the use of strongly recommended and recommended inter-ventions should be given priority for implementation or enforcement.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE COMMUNITY GUIDE
During 2001--2002, Community Guide topics will be prepared and released as each is completed. Upcoming topics include diabetes, oral health, physical activity, sexual behavior, cancer, and the sociocultural environment. A compilation of the recommendations and supporting evidence for these topics will be published in book form. Additional information regarding the Task Force and the Community Guide is available on the Internet at <http://www.thecommunityguide.org>.
*Patricia A. Buffler, Ph.D., M.P.H., University of California, Berkeley, and David W. Fleming, M.D., CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, served on the Task Force while most of the recommendations were being developed.
**Members of the consultation team were Julie C. Bolen, Ph.D., M.P.H., National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia; Robert D. Brewer, M.D., M.S.P.H., Nebraska Department of Health, Lincoln, Nebraska; Stephanie D. Bryn, M.P.H., Health Resources Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland; Forrest M. Council, Ph.D., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Robert W. Denniston, M.A., Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland; Andrea C. Gielen, Sc.D., Sc.M., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Sue Gorcowski, M.A., National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.; Charles A. Hurley, National Safety Council, Washington, D.C.; Bruce H. Jones, M.D., M.P.H., National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia; Trudy A. Karlson, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Mark R. Kinde, M.P.H., Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota; David W. Lawrence, M.P.H., San Diego State University, San Diego, California; Sue E. Martin, Ph.D., National Institute for Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Rockville, Maryland; Jim A. McKnight, Ph.D., National Public Service Research Institute, Landover, Maryland; Angela D. Mickalide, Ph.D., National SAFE KIDS Campaign, Washington, D.C.; James L. Nichols, Ph.D., National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C; Lloyd F. Novick, M.D., M.P.H., Onandaga County Department of Health, Syracuse, New York; Fred P. Rivara, M.D., M.P.H., University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Carol W. Runyan, Ph.D., M.P.H., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Richard J. Smith, M.S., Indian Health Service, Rockville, Maryland; Patricia F. Waller, Ph.D., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Allan F. Williams, Ph.D., Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, Virginia.
Established market economies as defined by the World Bank are Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bermuda, Canada, Channel Islands, Denmark, Faeroe Islands, Finland, France, Former Federal Republic of Germany, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Greenland, Holy See, Iceland, Ireland, Isle of Man, Italy, Japan, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Spain, St. Pierre and Miquelon, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
*** These databases can be accessed through the Dialog Corporation at <http://www.dialog.com>.
**** These databases can be accessed through the Dialog Corporation at <http://www.dialog.com>.
Return to top.
All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to email@example.com.
Page converted: 5/15/2001
This page last reviewed 5/15/2001