spacer

CDC HomeHIV/AIDS > Topics > Testing > Rapid HIV Testing > CDC Studies of Rapid HIV Testing

space HIV Testing
space
arrow Trends
space
arrow Challenges
space
arrow CDC Response
space
arrow Rapid HIV Testing
space
arrow Healthcare Settings
space
arrow Non-Health-care Settings
space
arrow Questions & Answers
space
arrow Fact Sheets
space
arrow Slide Sets
space
arrow Podcasts
space
arrow Reports
space
arrow Recommendations & Guidelines
space
arrow Bibliography
space
arrow Links
space
arrow Other Documents
space
 
LEGEND:
PDF Icon   Link to a PDF document
Non-CDC Web Link   Link to non-governmental site and does not necessarily represent the views of the CDC
Adobe Acrobat (TM) Reader needs to be installed on your computer in order to read documents in PDF format. Download the Reader.
spacer spacer
spacer
Skip Nav spacer
Impact of Rapid HIV Testing in Three Public Venues
spacer
spacer

S. Kendrick, MD1,2,3, K. Kroc, BS1, D. Withum, DrPH4, R. Rydman, PhD2, B. Branson, MD4, J. McAuley, MD5, C. Mennella, MD5, E. Couture, DO2, S. Miller, MD2, R. Weinstein, MD1,2,3.
1
CORE Center, Chicago, IL; 2Cook County Hospital, Chicago, IL; 3Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, 4CDC, Atlanta, GA; 5Cook County Jail, Chicago, IL

Background: Delayed or non-receipt of HIV test results and delayed entry into care for HIV positive (HIV+) individuals are common problems for public clinics. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of rapid HIV testing (RT) at three high-volume, high-prevalence public venues.

Methods: RT with SUDSŪ HIV-1 test was offered at 3 sites: an STD clinic, female receiving at a county jail, and a public hospital emergency department (ED). Patients (pts)  ≥18 years of age, able to provide informed consent, and not known to be HIV+ were eligible. EIA was also performed on all specimens, and a Western blot on repeatedly reactive specimens. Health educators performed all counseling, phlebotomy, and RT.

Results: Acceptance of RT and the number of HIV+ pts discovered and who entered into primary care differed at the 3 sites (table). More than 98% of all pts received HIV test results before leaving.

  STD JAIL ED
# months RT offered 10 4.5 8
# approached 2641 2984 7072
# (%) eligible 2018 (76) 2218 (74) 6038 (85)
# (%) accepted RT 1372 (68) 988 (45) 1652 (27)
# (%) new HIV+ 37 (2.7) 9 (0.9) 46 (2.8)

Two HIV+ pts expired (1 STD, 1 ED) prior to first primary care visit. Documented entry into care for HIV+ pts was 100% for the STD clinic (n= 36, median 10 days), 22% for the Jail (n= 2, median 49.5 days), and 80% for the ED (n= 36, median 14 days).

Conclusions: Acceptance of RT was lowest in the ED but the number of new HIV+ patients diagnosed was greater than in the STD clinic where acceptance was highest.  Prompt entry into care after RT was high for both settings. New HIV+ pts discovered by RT in the jail receiving area will require additional efforts to insure entry into care.

Presented at 40th Annual Meeting of Infectious Disease Society of America, Chicago, October 24-27, 2002

spacer
Last Modified: September 20, 2006
Last Reviewed: September 20, 2006
Content Source:
Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
horizontal dividing line
Contact Us
Please click here to view contact information.
divider
spacer
spacer
spacer
Home | Policies and Regulations | Disclaimer | e-Government | FOIA | Contact Us
spacer
spacer
spacer Safer, Healthier People
spacer
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348, 8A-8P (EST) M-F. Closed weekends and major federal holidays - cdcinfo@cdc.gov
spacer USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDHHS Department of Health
and Human Services