spacer

CDC HomeHIV/AIDS > Topics > Testing > Rapid HIV Testing > CDC Studies of Rapid HIV Testing

space HIV Testing
space
arrow Trends
space
arrow Challenges
space
arrow CDC Response
space
arrow Rapid HIV Testing
space
arrow Healthcare Settings
space
arrow Non-Health-care Settings
space
arrow Questions & Answers
space
arrow Fact Sheets
space
arrow Slide Sets
space
arrow Podcasts
space
arrow Reports
space
arrow Recommendations & Guidelines
space
arrow Bibliography
space
arrow Links
space
arrow Other Documents
space
 
LEGEND:
PDF Icon   Link to a PDF document
Non-CDC Web Link   Link to non-governmental site and does not necessarily represent the views of the CDC
Adobe Acrobat (TM) Reader needs to be installed on your computer in order to read documents in PDF format. Download the Reader.
spacer spacer
spacer
Skip Nav spacer
Rapid HIV Testing in an Emergency Department
spacer
spacer

K. Kroc1, S. Kendrick1,2,3, D. Withum4, E. Couture2, S. Miller2, B. Zagorski2, B. Branson4, R. Weinstein1,2,3.
1CORE Center, Chicago, IL; 2Cook County Hospital, Chicago, IL; 3Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL; 4CDC, Atlanta, GA

Background: Many patients use the Emergency Department (ED) for primary care, including STD treatment. Historically, the Cook County Hospital ED has referred patients seeking conventional HIV testing (CT) to ambulatory care clinics or to the CORE Center STD Screening Clinic (CORE).  The ED began CT in January 2001 and through May, 56 patients had received CT in the ED and 18% (10/56) reported to the CORE STD clinic or other hospital sites to receive their test results.

Objectives: To determine if point-of-care rapid HIV testing (RT) is feasible in a large urban hospital ED.

Methods: SUDSŪ HIV-1 test was offered to ED patients ages 18-60 beginning in June 2001.  Known HIV+ patients were excluded.  Health educators actively encouraged RT, obtained informed consent, and performed all counseling, phlebotomy, and RT.

Results: For the RT period June through August 2001,  82% (1717/2099) of patients were eligible, 24% (410/1717) accepted RT.  Twelve (2.9%) new HIV infections were identified. 98% (405/410) of patients received results and post-test counseling within 90 minutes of pretest counseling.

Conclusions: Point-of-care RT is feasible and accepted by a subset of ED patients.  RT improves client receipt of HIV test results. 

Implications for Programs/Policy: STD prevention programs should consider establishing linkages with EDs to foster HIV testing.  EDs should consider using RT to reduce the need for additional follow up and increase client receipt of results.

Implications for Research: Reasons for the relatively low test acceptance rate in ED require further study.  Studies to evaluate use of candidate simple, quick HIV rapid tests capable of reducing test turn around time in ED settings are warranted.

Presented at the 2002 National STD Prevention Conference, March 4-7, 2002, San Diego, CA.

spacer
Last Modified: September 12, 2006
Last Reviewed: September 12, 2006
Content Source:
Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
horizontal dividing line
Contact Us
Please click here to view contact information.
divider
spacer
spacer
spacer
Home | Policies and Regulations | Disclaimer | e-Government | FOIA | Contact Us
spacer
spacer
spacer Safer, Healthier People
spacer
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348, 8A-8P (EST) M-F. Closed weekends and major federal holidays - cdcinfo@cdc.gov
spacer USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDHHS Department of Health
and Human Services