spacer

CDC HomeHIV/AIDS > Topics > Testing > Rapid HIV Testing > CDC Studies of Rapid HIV Testing

space HIV Testing
space
arrow Trends
space
arrow Challenges
space
arrow CDC Response
space
arrow Rapid HIV Testing
space
arrow Healthcare Settings
space
arrow Questions & Answers
space
arrow Fact Sheets
space
arrow Slide Sets
space
arrow Podcasts
space
arrow Reports
space
arrow Recommendations & Guidelines
space
arrow Bibliography
space
arrow Links
space
 
LEGEND:
PDF Icon   Link to a PDF document
Non-CDC Web Link   Link to non-governmental site and does not necessarily represent the views of the CDC
Adobe Acrobat (TM) Reader needs to be installed on your computer in order to read documents in PDF format. Download the Reader.
spacer spacer
spacer
Skip Nav spacer
Ability of Untrained Users to Perform Rapid HIV Antibody Screening Tests
spacer
spacer

Kevin P. Delaney, MPH, Bernard Branson, MD, and Carol Fridlund
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

Background: One-step rapid HIV antibody tests suitable for point-of-care testing offer many advantages if they can be performed in outreach settings by persons with minimal training.

Purpose: To evaluate whether persons with no laboratory experience can successfully perform a rapid HIV test.

Methods: In the first phase of a multi-part prospective study, Health care workers (including HIV counselors) without laboratory experience performed the OraQuick Rapid HIV Antibody test on specimens previously tested with EIA and Western blot, after reading only the written instructions from the manufacturer. In the second phase, a similar cohort of participants (without laboratory experience) each conducted OraQuick on a panel of 4 specimens of known HIV status (including negative, strong- and weak- positive specimens), again using only written instructions. For both phases, performing the test correctly and recording a result that matched the known serostatus of the sample was considered successful completion of the test. Potential covariates, such as occupation and comfort with performing the test, were collected via questionnaire.

Results: The 259 participants performed 943 rapid tests. Eighty-seven tests (9%) were performed incorrectly and yielded no result. Of the remaining 856 tests, participants obtained the correct result on 827 (96.6%). Excluding tests with no result, participants obtained 220 (96.1%) correct results with strong positive specimens, 463 (97.3%) with negative specimens, and 144 (95.4%) with a weak positive specimen. Stratified analyses showed consistent results across study sites and participant characteristics.

Conclusions: Overall, untrained participants obtained a correct result on 96.6% of all Oraquick tests. By comparison, the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) requires trained laboratory technicians to achieve an overall testing score of 80% correct on proficiency testing.

Submitted as late breaker abstract, American Public Health Association Annual Meeting, October 2002.

spacer
Last Modified: September 12, 2006
Last Reviewed: September 12, 2006
Content Source:
Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer CDC Black Logospacer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348, 24 Hours/Every Day - cdcinfo@cdc.gov
spacer
spacerHHS Logo