|
AIDS cases are reported to CDC by all 50 states
and the District of Columbia by use of a uniform case
definition and case surveillance report form. This supplemental
report includes cases reported according to
the CDC guidelines for AIDS case surveillance and
the case definition in effect at the time of their report.
Data
in this report were compiled from cases reported to CDC through September
2002. Data on
AIDS diagnoses, deaths among persons with AIDS,
and persons living with AIDS were examined for 1994
to 2000. Data are statistically adjusted to correct for
temporal delays in the reports of cases and deaths,
and for unreported risk/exposure. Adjusted data are
preferred for the assessment of trends since data by
year of report are subject to surveillance artifacts such
as variations in active surveillance.
Reporting
delays (time between diagnosis of AIDS and report to CDC) may vary among
exposure, geographic,
racial/ethnic, age, and sex categories, and
have been as long as several years for some AIDS
cases. About 52% of all AIDS cases were reported to
CDC within 3 months of diagnosis and about 88%
were reported within 1 year. Among persons with
AIDS, estimates in delay of reporting of deaths show
that approximately 88% of deaths are reported within
1 year. Reporting delay adjustments to estimated
AIDS data are calculated by a maximum likelihood
statistical procedure, taking into account differences
in reporting delays among exposure, geographic, racial/ethnic, age, sex, and vital status categories, but
assuming that reporting delays within these groups
have not changed over time (1, 2).
In
1998, the procedures for the investigation of cases reported without risk
changed from ascertaining
risk for all reported cases to ascertaining risk on high
priority cases. As of September 2000, we began estimating
risk distributions from statistical models and
population-based samples. States continue to investigate
any report of an unusual exposure to HIV and
report these cases to CDC. CDC will continue to tabulate
the number of documented unusual exposures
to HIV as reported by the states.
Because
recently reported AIDS cases are more likely to be reported without history
of exposure to HIV
through any of the categories listed in the hierarchy of
exposure categories (NIR), recent AIDS diagnoses in
some exposure categories will be underestimated unless
an adjustment is made. For estimated AIDS diagnosis
tables and estimated AIDS trends figures, the adjustment of NIR adult/adolescent cases is based on
sex-, race-, and region-specific exposure category redistributions
of cases diagnosed from 1990 through
1998 that were initially assigned to the NIR category
but have subsequently been reclassified (1).
The
rates for 1994 through 1999 were calculated using population denominators
based on postcensus
estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau. In the 2000
census as specified in the 1997 Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) standards for the collection of race
and ethnicity data, 31 race categories were used. The
HIV and AIDS Reporting System continued to use the
4 race categories of non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic
Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/
Alaska Native in 2000. In order to produce rates by
race, it was necessary to bridge the 2000 census population
data for multiple races back to single race categories
using proportional allocation at the county/
sex/single year of age level. In addition, the 2000 census
data were modified to mirror the 1977 4 race categories
where Asians, Native Hawaiians, and other
Pacific Islanders were combined. The bridging procedure
was created by the Statistics and Data Management
Branch of the Division of HIV and AIDS Surveillance
and Epidemiology, National Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
References
- Green TA.
Using surveillance data to monitor trends in the AIDS epidemic. Statist
Med 1998;17:
143-54
- Karon JM,
Devine OJ, and Morgan WM. Predicting AIDS incidence by estrapolating from
recent
trends. In Castillo-Chavez C, ed Mathematical and
Statistical Approaches to AIDS Epidemiology (Lecture
Notes in Biomathematics). Berlin: Springer-Verlag,
1989:58-88.
|