 |
LEGEND:
 |
 |
|
Link to a PDF document |
 |
 |
|
Link to non-governmental site and does not
necessarily represent the views of the CDC |
|
 |
|
Adobe
Acrobat (TM) Reader needs to be installed on
your computer in order to read documents in PDF format.
Download the Reader.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| General Questions and Answers |
 |
 |
- What is CAPUS?
CAPUS is a three-year
cross-agency demonstration project led by CDC and aligned with the National
HIV/AIDS Strategy with the primary goal of reducing HIV/AIDS-related
morbidity and mortality among racial and ethnic minorities living in the
United States. We plan to fund 6 to 9 of the 18 eligible health departments
in the US. The primary goals of the project are to: (a) increase the
proportion of racial and ethnic minorities with HIV who have diagnosed
infection by expanding and improving HIV testing capacity, and (b) optimize
linkage to, retention in, and re-engagement with care and prevention
services for newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed racial and ethnic
minorities with HIV. These two goals are to be achieved by addressing
social, economic, clinical, and structural factors influencing HIV health
outcomes.
- How is CAPUS different from other health department funding distributed by the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention?
The primary focus of CAPUS is on
addressing the social determinants of health that are barriers to two very
specific and crucial interventions (testing and linkage to/ retention in
care). In contrast, the Enhanced Comprehensive HIV Prevention Planning and
Implementation for Metropolitan Statistical Areas Most Affect by HIV/AIDS (ECHPP)
FOA (PS11-1117) was focused on the 12 cities with the most cases of AIDS at
the end of 2007. The purpose of ECHPP was for each jurisdiction to develop a
comprehensive plan for all of their HIV resources and to implement a broad
range of interventions; 14 required interventions and up to 10 additional
recommended interventions (depending on their plan). Similarly, the recent
large health department FOA (PS12-1201) for HIV prevention is focused on the
entire broad range of interventions that a health department might implement
in their jurisdiction. By focusing only on testing and linkage/retention,
and by focusing on easing social and structural barriers to these two
important interventions, the purpose of this FOA is very different – both
more focused in terms of interventions, and broader in terms of trying to
address some of the root causes of inequities that underlie persistent HIV
transmission.
CAPUS also specifically stresses the importance of modifying health-care
delivery and other prevention and care systems to work more efficiently
across organizational boundaries, improving coordination among public and
private sectors, and addressing key social and structural determinants that
are barriers to achieving optimal health outcomes. This approach will
ultimately have the greatest impact on reducing HIV-related morbidity,
mortality, and health disparities. This project also will require grantees
to evaluate systems, leverage existing resources and tools, and carefully
utilize these new funds to obtain a greater return on public health
investments that directly address the overarching goals of the project.
- What agencies are eligible for CAPUS funding?
Health departments are
uniquely positioned to take a leadership role in supporting the optimization
of services across public, private, and community-based organizations to
achieve objectives of increased identification of HIV infection, earlier
entry to HIV care, and increased consistency of care. As a result, the CAPUS
FOA supports a limited competition funding opportunity announcement for 18
eligible health departments located in the United States. An estimated six
jurisdictions will be funded, with a maximum of nine. The health departments
include: Alabama State Department of Public Health; California Department of
Public Health; District of Columbia Department of Health; Florida State
Department of Health; Georgia State Department of Public Health; Illinois
Department of Public Health; Louisiana State Department of Health and
Hospitals; Maryland State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; Missouri
Department of Health and Senior Services; Mississippi State Department of
Health; North Carolina State Department of Health and Human Services; Ohio
Department of Health; Pennsylvania Department of Health; Puerto Rico Health
Department; South Carolina State Department of Health and Environmental
Control; Tennessee State Department of Health; Texas Department of State
Health Services; Virginia State Department of Health.
-
How were restrictions in eligibility selected?
As both the National HIV/AIDS
Strategy (NHAS) and DHAP’s Strategic Plan (2011-2015) note, in the face of
increasingly constrained resources and a concentrated, inequitably
distributed epidemic, HIV prevention funding must be allocated to those
communities and regions that shoulder the greatest share of the national
burden. In addition, reducing HIV-related health disparities is one of the
three primary goals of the NHAS.
Because of the high HIV disease burden among racial and ethnic minority
populations, the disproportionate rate of AIDS diagnoses and associated
mortality, and the pervasive impact of social and structural determinants of
health, CAPUS includes limited eligibility for funding 18 state or district
health departments in the United States. The 18 jurisdictions were selected
based upon meeting the following three criteria:
a. Burden of HIV disease. In line with the Secretary’s Minority AIDS
Initiative Funding and the National HIV/AIDS Strategy’s focus on decreasing
health disparities and maximizing reductions in national incidence and
mortality, only jurisdictions with greater than 5,000 HIV cases among
African Americans and Latinos were chosen.
b. Disproportionately affected areas. Second, only those jurisdictions that
had an AIDS diagnosis rate of over 6 per 100,000 in 2010 were chosen. This
focus on disproportionately affected geographic areas is consistent with the
National HIV/AIDS Strategy’s focus on decreasing health disparities.
c. Social determinants of health. Third, only those jurisdictions with a
teen birth rate over 25 per 1,000 were chosen. This indicator allowed a
focus on jurisdictions with underlying social and economic factors that
impede HIV prevention and care.
Eligibility criteria cut-points were selected to narrow the eligibility pool
given anticipated funding levels and the broad systems-level requirements
and activities outlined in the FOA. Additionally, limiting competition to
the 18 selected health departments and including a tiered funding system
increases the probability that an individual eligible applicant is
competitive and receives funding.
-
Are directly-funded city health departments that are not included in the 18 eligible health departments able to receive CAPUS funding by working directly with a state health department?
Yes, grantees will be required to maximize the public health impact of the
resources in which they invest to improve testing and
linkage/retention/re-engagement outcomes by working with a number of public and
private partnerships within areas of the jurisdiction with greatest need.
Because there is not one approach that will work effectively to address the
overarching goals of the project across all jurisdictions, grantees will be
examining and evaluating prevention and care approaches that when combined and
brought to scale in the right locations, have the greatest public health impact.
These combined activities should also have the greatest potential to address the
social and structural determinants of health that are known to create the most
significant barriers to testing, linkage to, retention in, and re-engagement
with care and prevention in the applicant’s jurisdiction. This framework
acknowledges that prevention and care/treatment synergistically contribute to
reducing HIV-related morbidity, mortality, and related health disparities among
racial and ethnic minorities in the United States.
-
Did CDC receive input from other federal agencies on the development of the CAPUS FOA?
In keeping with the spirit and
goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS), and in recognition of the
complex, interrelated, and multi-sectorial nature of these goals, a
multi-agency federal partnership guided the development of the CAPUS FOA.
The partnership includes: 1) the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC), Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention (lead agency), 2) the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) (the Office of HIV/AIDS and Infectious
Disease Policy (OHAIDP), the Office of Minority Health (OMH), and the Office
on Women’s Health (OWH)), 3) the Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA) (both the HIV/AIDS Bureau (HAB) and the Bureau of
Primary Health Care (BPHC)), and 4) the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration) (SAMHSA). Together, this cross-agency federal
partnership team will provide ongoing leadership during all phases of
project implementation.
-
How much federal funding is allocated for CAPUS?
CAPUS includes approximately
$14,184,912 of funding for Year 1 activities (FY2012). The total projected
estimated funding for Years 1, 2 and 3 of the project is $44,184,912. Total
estimated funding for Years 1, 2 and 3 is subject to availability of funds.
-
Are all funded state health departments funded at the same award level? Could you explain the rationale for the three tier system?
ITo balance funding between
the 18 eligible health department jurisdictions, the health departments are
divided into three tiers with higher, medium, and lower HIV morbidity. The
tiers are defined at natural HIV prevalence cut-points (looking at data from
the 2010 HIV Surveillance Report) for funding purposes:
- Tier 1: Applicants eligible for Tier 1 are limited to six eligible health
departments with an HIV prevalence of at least 30,000 cases.
- Tier 2: Applicants eligible for Tier 2 are limited to six eligible health
departments with an HIV prevalence of at least 16,000 cases but less than
30,000 cases.
- Tier 3: Applicants eligible for Tier 3 are limited to six eligible health
departments with an HIV prevalence of at least 8,000 cases but less than
16,000 cases.
Up to 4 awards will be made within each tier, and a maximum of 9 total
awards is anticipated. Each of the funding tiers has an approximate ceiling,
average, and floor award level based upon the number of total awards and
available funding. The following are approximate funding levels for Year 1
(FY2012):
- Floor of Individual Award Range: Tier 1= $2,500,000; Tier 2= $1,650,000;
Tier 3= $1,000,000
- Approximate Average Award: Tier 1= $3,000,000; Tier 2= $2,000,000; Tier 3=
$1,200,000
- Ceiling of Individual Award Range: Tier 1= $3,500,000; Tier 2= $2,350,000;
Tier 3= $1,400,000
-
Does CAPUS funding include Affordable Care Act money?
CAPUS is funded through the
HHS Secretary’s Minority AIDS Initiative Fund and does not include
federal funds appropriated through the Affordable Care Act Prevention and
Public Health Fund.
-
What role do community-based organizations have in CAPUS funding?
Grantees must fund
community-based organizations (e.g., AIDS service organizations, hospitals,
clinics, federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), community health
centers (CHCs), faith-based organizations, sororities, fraternities, and
other non-profit organizations) within their jurisdiction using a minimum of
25% of the total award for the development of human capital, skills,
partnerships, and infrastructure development, as appropriate, to implement
the activities required by the funding opportunity announcement. A CBO must
(1) be positioned to provide services directly to clients and (2) must be
recognized by members of the community as credible health or social service
providers. Colleges, universities, and research institutions do not qualify
as CBOs. This however, does not preclude universities from being partners or
otherwise involved in the demonstration project via agreements.
-
How will the CAPUS project be managed?
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention will function as the
lead agency; however the cross-agency federal partnership team will provide
additional ongoing leadership and technical assistance to grantees during
all phases of project implementation.
-
How will CAPUS funded activities be measured and evaluated?
CAPUS is designed to increase
the overall impact of prevention activities on HIV-related morbidity,
mortality, and incidence by enhancing public health systems and processes
that determine when in the course of their infections racial and ethnic
minorities living with HIV are diagnosed; if and when racial and ethnic
minorities diagnosed with HIV are linked to care; and whether HIV-positive
individuals are effectively retained in care. Accordingly, program
performance will primarily be assessed using impact and outcome measures
that can be calculated using existing, HHS-supported data systems (e.g., HIV
disease surveillance). Any additional community level or population based
impact measures identified by the federal partners or the grantee will be
collected using similarly extant data systems (e.g., the Ryan White Services
Report) and in close collaboration with local HIV prevention programs and
other federal partners. Guidance on program monitoring and evaluation (M&E)
and performance measures will be provided by the federal partners on an
ongoing basis throughout the project period.
-
What are CAPUS grantees being asked to do?
Grantees will focus on
developing and implementing a demonstration project to address the following
goals: 1) increase the proportion of racial and ethnic minorities with HIV
who have diagnosed infection by expanding and improving HIV testing
capacity, and 2) optimize linkage to, retention in, and re-engagement with
care, treatment, and prevention services for newly diagnosed and previously
diagnosed racial and ethnic minorities with HIV. These two goals should be
achieved by addressing social, economic, clinical, and structural factors
influencing HIV health outcomes. Funded health departments must develop a
work plan that includes a set of required components and any additional
supplemental/optional components or other approaches the jurisdiction
selects to help achieve the overarching goals of the project. Because there
is not one approach that will work effectively to address the overarching
goals of the project across all jurisdictions, grantees should examine and
evaluate approaches that will, when combined, have the greatest public
health impact.
-
Why is teen pregnancy rate used as an indicator of SDH?
Teen birth rate was selected
because the cross-agency federal partnership team wanted to use a non-HIV
specific indicator of social determinants of health to select eligible
jurisdictions for the CAPUS FOA. However, grantees will not be required to
affect change in the teen birth rate within the jurisdiction.
|
 |
|
|
|