 |
LEGEND:
 |
 |
|
Link to a PDF document |
 |
 |
|
Link to non-governmental site and does not
necessarily represent the views of the CDC |
|
 |
| Adobe
Acrobat (TM) Reader needs to be installed on
your computer in order to read documents in PDF format.
Download the Reader.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Outcome Evaluation |
 |
 |
- Can you use proxy measures for behavior change for outcome
evaluation such as attitudes, beliefs, norms, or behavioral intentions or do
you need to measure actual behavior change?
Since the ultimate
objective of HIV prevention is to change risky behaviors, measures of
behavior change are preferred for outcome evaluation. However, measures of
change in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, norms, or intentions are
acceptable.
NOTE: More information on outcome evaluation will be provided.
Use of Evaluation Data
- How will data be used and how will CDC guard against misuse?
The Evaluation Guidance states that data provided by health departments
will be used for three purposes:
To report to federal, state, and local stakeholders (including
communities, health departments, local and national organizations,
and federal policymakers) progress made through HIV prevention
programs supported by CDC funds;
To improve national policies regarding HIV prevention;
To identify ways to improve HIV prevention programs nationwide.
CDC is interested in aggregated, national-level data. It is not CDC’s
intent to use local data in a punitive way. Data are collected and analyzed
for the purpose of program improvement. State-level data will be shared with
project officers. State-level data will not be shared with persons outside
of CDC without consultation and discussion with state health department
officials.
- Interventions may vary within a jurisdiction; for example,
prevention case management may be carried out with varying levels of
intensity throughout a state. Will data on interventions at the
jurisdiction-level be pooled together in a national data set?
Yes, data on interventions will be pooled together, with the
acknowledgment of differences in how interventions are delivered. Health
departments may provide narrative to explain variations in interventions.
- Will CDC change its funding formula to reflect the effectiveness
of interventions. In other words, will jurisdictions get more money if their
interventions are effective?
CDC does not foresee linking funding to
empirically demonstrated effectiveness.
- Will CDC penalize jurisdictions who report reaching fewer people
if that is the result of efforts to more specifically target their
interventions to certain risk behaviors?
No. This would be seen as improving interventions, and large numbers are
not necessarily a measure of success.
|
|
|
|