 |
LEGEND:
 |
 |
|
Link to a PDF document |
 |
 |
|
Link to non-governmental site and does not
necessarily represent the views of the CDC |
|
 |
| Adobe
Acrobat (TM) Reader needs to be installed on
your computer in order to read documents in PDF format.
Download the Reader.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Intervention Taxonomy/Categories |
 |
 |
- How do we distinguish between individual level interventions (ILIs)
and counseling and testing in process monitoring?
An ILI may or may not lead to testing, and all ILI clients seen
outside of the counseling and testing site per se--whether they go on
to get tested or not--are counted in process monitoring for ILIs.
Clients who are counseled as part of pre-test counseling should not be
counted as ILI clients. Counseling and test site clients are reported on
the HIV counseling and testing report form.
- Is outreach for counseling and testing not considered part of
outreach?
"Outreach" is generally defined as educational interventions
conducted face-to-face in places where clients congregate. For the
purpose of the Evaluation Guidance, outreach solely for the
purpose of getting clients into counseling and testing, should not
be included under "Outreach."
- In regard to "Partner Counseling and Referral Services (PCRS),
for intervention plans and process monitoring, are we counting HIV+ index
cases or the partners of HIV+ persons who are notified and counseled?
The first page of the forms for intervention plan and process
monitoring data for PCRS ("HIV-Infected Clients to Receive PCRS with CDC
Funds" and "HIV-Infected Clients Who Received PCRS with CDC Funds,"
respectively) refers to HIV+ index cases. Page 2 of the process
monitoring form for PCRS asks for data on the sex or needle sharing
partners of HIV+ index cases.
- Where do we report on CTRPN and coalition building as
interventions?
The forms in the Evaluation Guidance for reporting intervention plan
data as well as process monitoring data do not cover CTRPN and coalition
building. It is suggested that you provide a narrative report that
describes these efforts.
- Can CDC funding be used for policy interventions?
CDC funding, like all funding from Congress, cannot be used to lobby
federal or local legislative bodies. CDC funds may not be used for
propaganda purposes or for the preparation, distribution or use of such
items as publications or radio or television presentations designed to
support or defeat pending legislation.
However, CDC funding may be used for community-level interventions
that seek to lessen risky conditions and behaviors in a community
through a focus on the community as a whole. As the Evaluation Guidance
points out, this is often done by attempting to alter social norms or
characteristics of the environment. Such efforts are also referred to as
"structural interventions" and may be funded with CDC cooperative
agreement funding.
Specific questions regarding structural interventions and whether
they meet funding requirements should be referred to project officers.
- What intervention would you use for a "chatroom" on the Internet;
for example, a chatroom for MSM?
HIV/AIDS health education and risk reduction information provided to
persons via a chatroom should be considered under "Other Interventions"
on the forms for intervention plans and process monitoring. The
intervention is not necessarily an individual-level intervention,
according to the intervention types in the "Evaluation Guidance," since
more than one individual is reached, and it’s not necessarily a
group-level intervention or health communications and public
information. Use the form for other interventions or provide a narrative
description.
- The definition of Prevention Case Management (PCM) in the
Evaluation Guidance seems more loosely defined than CDC’s guidance on PCM.
Which definition applies?
CDC’s guidelines on PCM are not mandates for how PCM should be
implemented. For evaluation, use the definition of PCM in the Evaluation
Guidance. This broader definition will include the definition found in
CDC’s PCM guidance. As with all the intervention categories, national
data about PCM will include some data from more rigorous implementation
and some from less rigorous implementation. This is also true of ILI,
GLI, and outreach interventions.
- What constitutes "skills building" for GLI? Does every
participant in a GLI need to demonstrate the skill or is it sufficient for
one client to demonstrate the skill and the others to observe?
A variety of skills can be "built" during GLI (and ILI). If, for
example, the skill is condom use and a phallic model is used to
demonstrate how to fit a condom and at least one member of the group
participates in the demonstration, the entire group can be considered as
having participated in the skill building exercise. Critical thinking
and decision-making skills are skills that can be enhanced during GLI.
If these skills are discussed and demonstrated by members of the group
through various exercises or activities, the entire group can be
considered as having participated in the intervention.
- What is really meant by CLI (community-level interventions) and
social marketing? What is the distinction between CLI and a set of related
but distinct interventions working toward a common goal (e.g., an agency
implementing outreach, ILI and GLI targeting MSM in a particular community)?
Should a CLI be deconstructed into its component interventions and then each
intervention separated for intervention plans and process monitoring
reporting?
As the Evaluation Guidance puts it, "CLI are interventions that seek
to improve the risk conditions and behaviors in a community through a
focus on the community as a whole, rather than by intervening with
individuals or small groups. This is often done by attempting to alter
social norms, policies, or characteristics of the environment. Examples
include community mobilizations, social marketing campaigns,
community-wide events, policy interventions, and structural
interventions."
Social marketing is the application of commercial technologies to the
planning and implementation of prevention programs. Social marketing is
not social advertising, social education, attitude change, or socially
responsible marketing of HIV prevention messages. Examples of social
marketing programs at CDC include the "America Responds to AIDS"
campaign and the "5-A-Day Nutrition" campaign.
The definition above of CLI indicates that it does not focus on
individuals or small groups whereas outreach, ILI, and GLI do focus on
individuals and small groups. If a grantee employs a set of related but
distinct interventions working toward a common goal, it is appropriate
to "deconstruct" that program into its component elements and report on
each intervention separately for intervention plan and process
monitoring data.
- How should an intervention be categorized that counsels couples
and includes skills building and/or service brokerage? What if it does not
include skills building or service brokerage?
An intervention that counsels couples and includes skill building and
service brokerage should probably be categorized as GLI (the
intervention could be considered PCM if it meets the criteria for PCM
established by the health department or grantee or if it is carried out
in accordance with CDC’s guidance on PCM). In this example, "counseling"
refers to HIV/AIDS prevention counseling, not mental health counseling.
Skills building (not service brokerage) must be a part of GLI. If there
is no skills building, then the intervention cannot be categorized as GLI. Service brokerage is not considered a
necessary component of GLI. It is, however, a necessary component of
PCM.
- What intervention type should be used to report condom drop-off
activities (e.g, putting condoms in bowls in bars)?
Condom drop-off activities should be recorded under "Other
Interventions" because they do not readily fit under any other
intervention type. For example, "Outreach" is not appropriate because
there is no face-to-face contact with clients. "Health
Communications/Public Information" is not appropriate because no
information is conveyed by the drop-off activities. When interventions
are reported as "Other," the intervention should be explained.
- What intervention type should be used to report brochures and
other materials that health departments distribute to their grantees? What
about materials they distribute to agencies they don’t fund for HIV
prevention?
The recipients of the printed materials distributed by health
departments do not affect the intervention type that should be used for
reporting. The intervention type is "Health Communications/Public
Information" (print media distribution).
- When does outreach become an individual-level intervention? For
example, during outreach the outreach worker can spend a lot of time with
one person on health education, risk reduction counseling, and skills
building. If an ILI develops out of an outreach encounter, should health
departments report on both interventions?
If outreach develops into an intervention that meets the criteria for
ILI, then both intervention types should be reported.
|
|
|
|