 |
LEGEND:
 |
 |
|
Link to a PDF document |
 |
 |
|
Link to non-governmental site and does not
necessarily represent the views of the CDC |
|
 |
| Adobe
Acrobat (TM) Reader needs to be installed on
your computer in order to read documents in PDF format.
Download the Reader.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| General Issues Relating to Both Intervention Plans and Process Monitoring |
 |
 |
- On the forms for intervention plans and process monitoring,
should we count all clients if the intervention is only partially funded by
CDC, or should we use a "pro-rated" number?
For interventions where CDC cooperative agreement funding is only one funding
source, health departments should "pro-rate" the number of clients who receive
the intervention with CDC cooperative agreement funding. Departments should know
what percentage of funding cooperative agreement funds represent for the
intervention and use that percentage to figure out the "pro rated" number of
clients. For example, if CDC cooperative agreement funding represents 75 percent
of the funding for the intervention, then 75 percent of the clients should be
considered CDC clients. The gender, race and ethnicity of these clients (and
their ages, if possible) should also be identified. The distribution of gender.
race and ethnicity for the 75 percent should represent the distribution for all
clients receiving the intervention. For example, there are 100 clients; 50 are
African American males; 25 are Latino males; and 25 are White males. The
jurisdiction would report 75 clients: half (50 percent) are African American
males = 38 African American males; 25 percent are Latino males = 19 Latino
males; 25 percent are White males = 18 White males.
- The forms in the Evaluation Guidance on process monitoring ask
for statewide definitions or guidelines for the intervention being reported
on, but the forms for intervention plans do not ask for this information.
What does CDC want and when should the material be submitted?
CDC would like to receive one set of definitions or guidelines for
each jurisdiction’s interventions. This material should be submitted
with intervention plan data since those data are due before the process
monitoring data. For convenience, jurisdictions may submit one master
list, rather than separate definitions or guidance for each risk
population per intervention.
- The forms in the Evaluation Guidance on intervention plans and
process monitoring ask about interventions provided by various types of
agencies. How are minority CBOs, faith communities, and individual agencies
defined?
A minority board CBO has a board or governing body composed of
greater than 50 percent of the racial/ethnic minority population to be
served, and members of the racial/ethnic minority population to be
served must serve in greater than 50 percent of key positions in the
organization, including management, supervisory, administrative, and
service provision positions.
The Evaluation Guidance refers to "Faith Community." For the
Evaluation Guidance, a faith community can include faith-based CBOs as
well as other faith-based entities funded to carry out HIV prevention,
such as a coalition of clergy. Specifically in regard to faith-based
CBOs, CDC defines them as organizations that have a faith, spiritual, or
religious focus or constituency, and have access to local faith,
spiritual, and religious leaders and communities. Examples of
faith-based CBOs include individual churches, mosques, temples, or other
places of worship; a network or coalition of churches, mosques, temples,
or other places of worship; or a CBO whose primary constituents are
faith, spiritual, or religious community organizations or leaders.
"Individual" does not refer to an agency, but to an individual person
not affiliated with a public or private agency or organization; e.g, an
individual hired as a consultant.
- How do you code an agency when it can fit more than one category
for intervention plan and process monitoring data (i.e., #5 on intervention
plan forms and #6 on process monitoring forms)?
Health departments need to decide on just one code for an agency that
can fit more than one code. Choose the description that BEST describes
the grantee or the one code the grantee would use to describe itself.
- Should the client designation on the Evaluation Guidance forms
that reads "Asian/Pacific Islander" be reworded to separate Asian and
Pacific Islander?
The race and ethnicity designations on the forms have been revised to
conform to federal reporting requirements established by the Office of
Management and Budget and CDC guidelines for consistency in data
collection. The races include "American Indian or Alaska Native;"
"Asian;" "Black or African American;" "Native Hawaiian or other Pacific
Islander;" and "White." The forms also include "Hispanic or Latino," and
"Not Hispanic or Latino." These revised forms are available and should
be used for the submission of intervention plan data in September 2001
(covering the period, January-December 2002) and process monitoring
data in April 2002 (covering the period, January-December 2001).
- What is the definition of Hispanic?
Hispanic or Latino is defined as "a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto
Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin,
regardless of race."
- How should race and ethnicity be recorded when data are based on
observation for outreach?
Best estimates should be used to record and report process
monitoring data.
- Why are there different age categories on the Evaluation Guidance
forms compared to the budget tables?
The budget tables refer to age in regard to budgets for one category
– "young people" 13 to 25 years of age. The Guidance forms have three
categories for age: 19 or younger; 20 -29; and 30+ years old to capture
three important age distinctions: youth, young adults, and older adults.
The Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention is working to reconcile any
differences in the ways age data are reported. Since different branches
may report and/or collect age data in different ways (for example, one
group may want more fine-tuned data than three categories will allow),
CDC is working to assure that data can be "collapsed" so the categories
can fit one another.
- Will CDC understand that differences between intervention plan
data on clients to be served and data on clients served in process
monitoring may be due to difficulty documenting risk behaviors rather than
interventions failing to reach clients?
Yes. CDC requests that health departments explain these challenges in a narrative format.
|
|
|
|