Compendium of Evidence-Based Interventions and
Best Practices for HIV Prevention
Women’s Health Promotion (WHP)
HIV-negative heterosexual Hispanic women
Goals of Intervention
- Eliminate or reduce sex risk behavior
The Women’s Health Promotion (WHP) intervention includes twelve intensive 90- to -120-minute sessions delivered over 12 weeks. The WHP consists of four standard HIV education sessions (lasting about 6 to 9 hours) that address HIV transmission and prevention, sexually transmitted diseases, sexual and reproductive anatomy, condom practice, and condom negotiation skills. These sessions use lectures, group discussion, and skill-building exercises and games to teach participants. The eight additional sessions involve speakers on a variety of topics deemed relevant by participants, including general mental health, depression, cervical cancer, non-HIV-related partner communication, diabetes, nutrition, partner violence, oppression, and social justice.
WHP is implemented in small, closed groups comprised of 10 to 16 women, co-facilitated by two bilingual community health educators, and conducted in Spanish.
- Social Cognitive Theory
- Theory of Reasoned Action
- Health Belief Model
Twelve 90- to 120-minute sessions delivered over 12 weeks
Community clinic serving largely Hispanic clients
Two trained bilingual community health educators. The primary facilitator is a respected community leader with experience in HIV education.
- Group discussions
An intervention package is not available at this time. Please contact Dr. Anita Raj, PhD, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, T2W, Boston, MA 02118 e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
The original evaluation was conducted in Boston, Massachusetts.
Key Intervention Effects
- Increased condom use
The analytic study sample of 162 Hispanic women is characterized by the following:
- 100% Hispanic (55% Dominican, 13% Puerto Rican, 13% Central American, 8% South American)
- 100% Female
- 100% Heterosexual
- Mean age of 29 years
- 71% completed high school education
Housing projects, clinics, and community service programs (i.e., ESL, GED, and non-HIV health education classes)
Spanish-speaking Hispanic women were eligible if they were between 18 and 35 years old, engaged in sexual intercourse with a steady male partner during the past 3 months, did not use a condom or engaged in inconsistent condom use with a steady male partner during the past 3 months, did not engage in injection drug use or sex trade in the past 6 months, and had no plan to relocate from their Boston-based community in the next year.
Women (N = 170) were assigned, in a manner without apparent bias, to 1 of 3 groups: Women’s Health Promotion (WHP; n = 56), HIV Intensive Prevention (HIV-IP; n = 44), or wait list control (n = 70).
The control participants received HIV prevention material and referrals and were on a waiting list for a 12-week HIV prevention program after study completion.
Relevant Outcomes Measured and Follow-up Time
- Sex behaviors during past 3 months (including frequency of condom use with main male partner during vaginal sex, condom use every time, and mean number of sex partners) were measured at immediate-post, 3-month, and 15-month follow-ups.
- Communication/negotiation index (including refused to have sex without a condom, demanded partner use a condom) during past 3 months was assessed at immediate-post, 3-month, and 15-month follow-ups.
- HIV testing behavior during past 3 months was assessed at immediate-post, 3-month, and 15-month follow-ups.
96% retained at 3 months
75% retained at 15 months
91% retained at 3 months
73% retained at 15 months
- Wait List Control:
87% retained at 3 months
77% retained at 15 months
Women receiving the WHP intervention were significantly more likely to use condoms during vaginal sex with their main male partner compared to women in the wait list control at the 3-month follow-up (p < .05).
- The WHP intervention effect on condom use was not significant at the 15-month follow up.
- The HIV-IP intervention fails to meet the best-evidence or GOOD-EVIDENCE criteria because the adjusted analyses did not yield significant findings for the relevant outcomes.
- Raj, A., Amaro, H., Cranston, K., Martin, B., Cabral, H., Navarro, et al. (2001). Is a general women's health promotion program as effective as an HIV-intensive prevention program in reducing HIV risk among Hispanic women? Public Health Reports, 116, 599-607.
- Amaro, H., Raj, A., Reed, E., & Cranston, K. (2002). Implementation and long-term outcomes of two HIV intervention programs for Latinas. Health Promotion Practice, 3, 245-254.
Researcher: Dr. Anita Raj
Boston University School of Public Health
715 Albany Street, T2W
Boston, MA 02118