Compendium of Evidence-Based HIV Behavioral Interventions
Partnership for Health (Loss-frame Intervention)
HIV-positive clinic patients
Goals of Intervention
Eliminate or reduce unprotected anal or vaginal sex
The Partnership for Health (PfH) Loss-frame intervention is a one-on-one, brief provider-administered safer sex intervention for HIV-positive persons in care. The intervention emphasizes the importance of the patient-provider relationship to promote patients’ healthful behavior. At each clinic visit, the provider delivers a brief counseling session (3-5 minutes) with messages that focus on self-protection, partner protection, and disclosure. Loss-framed messages are framed in a way that emphasizes the risks or negative consequences of risky behavior. The provider also uses the brochures, informational flyers and posters with the loss-framed messages to facilitate counseling and work with the patient to identify goals for the patient to work on.
- Message Framing Theory
- Mutual Participation
- Stages of Changes
A 3- to 5-minute session at every clinic visit over 10 to 11 months
Medical providers at the clinics (e.g., physician, physician assistant, nurse, nurse practitioner)
- Goal setting
- Printed Materials
An intervention package was developed with funding from CDC’s Replicating Effective Programs (REP) Project. The intervention package and training are available through CDC’s Diffusion of Effective Behavioral Interventions (DEBI) project.
The original evaluation was conducted in 6 large HIV clinics in California between 1998 and 2000.
Key Intervention Effectss
- Reduced unprotected sex
The analytic study sample of 585 HIV-positive clinic patients is characterized by the following:
- 41% White, 37% Hispanic, 16% African American, 6% Other
- 86% Male, 14% Female
- 75% homosexual/bisexual, 25% heterosexual
- Mean age of 38 years
- 46% completed high school education or less
Six HIV Clinics
HIV-positive patients were eligible if they were sexually active in the previous 3 months, at least 18 years old, fluent in English or Spanish, and intended to obtain care at the recruitment clinic for the next year.
Six HIV clinics were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: Loss-frame intervention (n = 2 clinics; 214 patients assessed), Gain-frame intervention (n = 2 clinics; 175 patients assessed), or Medication Adherence comparison (n = 2 clinics; 196 patients assessed). In each clinic, all patients were offered the intervention and sub-samples of clinic patients were systematically selected for assessment.
The Medication Adherence comparison group received a one-on-one, brief provider-administered counseling session (3-5 minutes) to promote medication adherence at each clinic visit.
Relevant Outcomes Measured and Follow-up Time
Sex behaviors during past 3 months (including anal, vaginal and oral sex with or without using a condom with main partners, casual partners, or exchange partners) were measured at 1 to 7 months after intervention.
- Loss-frame intervention:
72% retained at 1 to 7 months after intervention
- Gain-frame intervention:
58% retained at 1 to 7 months after intervention
- Medication Adherence comparison:
68% retained at 1 to 7 months after intervention
- Among HIV-positive patients who had 2 or more sex partners at baseline, those assigned to the Loss-frame intervention were significantly less likely to report unprotected anal/vaginal intercourse than those in the comparison group at 1 to 7 months after intervention (p = .03). This intervention effect was also found to be significant among men who have sex with men with 2 or more sex partners at baseline (p = .04).
- Among HIV-positive patients who had any casual/exchange partners at baseline, the Loss-frame intervention participants were significantly less likely to report unprotected anal/vaginal intercourse than the comparison participants at 1 to 7 months after intervention (p = .04).
- The Partnership for Health Loss-frame intervention fails to meet the best-evidence criteria due to a short follow-up time and low retention rates.
- Although, the Loss-frame intervention reduced unprotected anal/vaginal sex among HIV-positive patients with 2 or more sex partners, patients with one sexual partner at baseline were unaffected by the intervention.
- The Gain-frame intervention, which has the same format as the loss-frame intervention but emphasizes the benefits or positive consequences of protective behavior, fails to meet the GOOD-EVIDENCE criteria due to no statistically significant intervention effects on sex risk behaviors at the follow-up and low retention rates.
- This intervention could be considered a structural-level intervention as the entire clinic procedures were altered and all clinic patients received the intervention while only a sample of patients were included in the evaluation. Since the evaluation used a cohort design, which can be reviewed with these criteria, this intervention is included within this review & also will be updated later in the community-level and structural-level intervention section of the website.
- Richardson, J. L., Milam, J., McCutchan, A., Stoyanoff, S., Bolan, R., Weiss, J., et al. (2004). Effect of brief safer-sex counseling by medical providers to HIV-1 seropositive patients: A multi-clinic assessment. AIDS, 18, 1179-1186.
Researcher: Dr. Jean L. Richardson
Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine
University of Southern California
1441 Eastlake Avenue, NTT 3409A
Los Angeles, CA 90089-9175