Skip directly to local search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home

Genetic Testing


Genomic Tests and Family History by Levels of Evidence


The CDC Office of Public Health Genomics ranks the following list for levels of evidence of genomic tests and family health history in practice . This approach was based on a paper by Khoury and updated in accordance with criteria presented by a 2014 paper in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. The criteria are  shown in the following figure to provide additional information to our readers. This list is updated on an ongoing basis andprovided only for informational purposes to researchers, healthcare providers, public health programs and others.

Green
  • FDA label requires use of test to inform choice or dose of a drug
  • CMS covers testing
  • Clinical practice guidelines based on systematic review supports testing

Yellow
  • FDA label mentions biomarkers*
  • CMS coverage with evidence development
  • Clinical practice guideline, not based on systematic review, supports use of test
  • Clinical practice guideline finds insufficient evidence but does not discourage use of test
  • Systematic review, without clinical practice guideline, supports use of test
  • Systematic review finds insufficient evidence but does not discourage use of test
  • Clinical practice guideline recommends dosage adjustment, but does not address testing

Red
  • FDA label cautions against use
  • CMS decision against coverage
  • Clinical practice guideline recommends against use of test
  • Clinical practice guideline finds insufficient evidence and discourages use of test
  • Systematic review recommends against use
  • Systematic review finds insufficient evidence and discourages use
  • Evidence available only from published studies without systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines, FDA label or CMS labels coverage decision
*Can be reassigned to Green of Red of one or more conditions in these categories apply
Tier 3/Red category: represents genomic and family health history applications either have synthesized evidence culminating in recommendations against use (or discouraging use), OR no relevant synthesized evidence was identified. Such applications are not ready for routine practice, but may be considered in clinical and population research.

Gene, Gene/Drug, Test, or Family History Disorder/Indication Use* Synthesized Evidence Sources
HFE hereditary hemochromatosis population screening USPSTF (2006)
routine BRCA genetic counseling, routine BRCA testing Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, in women whose family history is not associated with an increased risk of BRCA mutations population screening USPSTF (2013)
panels for various genetic risk factors common diseases risk assessment, disease prevention Multiple sources, for example: EGAPP (2010)
next generation sequencing/whole genome sequence various common diseases risk prediction Rapidly evolving landscape; gaps in knowledge exist for analytic validity, clinical validity and clinical utility
SNP panels type 2 diabetes risk prediction EGAPP [PDF 242.05 KB] (2013)
TCF7L2 genotyping type 2 diabetes risk prediction EGAPP [PDF 242.05 KB] (2013)
NRAS or PIK3CA mutation analysis and/or testing for loss of PTEN or AKT protein expression/anti-EGFR therapy metastatic colorectal cancer PGx

EGAPP [PDF 456.16 KB] (2013)

Systematic review (2011)

CYP450 testing/SSRIs non-psychotic depression PGx, PGx-dose EGAPP (2007)
tumor gene expression analysis (Prolaris®, Oncotype Dx® Prostate prostate cancer prognostic, management BCBS TEC (2014)
emerging genomic tests in the CDC's GAPP Finder of the GAPP Knowledge Base various disorders various uses Almost all of these applications (except when listed above) have insufficient information on analytic or clinical validity, or clinical utility

*Pharmacogenomic applications have been classified in the Use column as either PGx (which may relate to drug choice, prevention of adverse events, or other uses of the information gained through testing), or PGx-dose (when specific dosing-related guidance is provided, or mention of a potential effect on dose is noted in the evidence sources cited). Additional Use categories include: screening, cascade testing, risk prediction, diagnostic, and prognostic.

Source Abbreviations: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC), US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)

Other Abbreviations: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), pharmacogenomics (PGx), single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)

Top of Page

Previous Table: Tier 2

Tier Tables
  1. Tier 1
  2. Tier 2
  3. [Tier 3]
 

Contact Us:
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
    800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636)
  • Additional information for Public Health Genomics is available on our contact page.
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO
A-Z Index
  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #