Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home

Laboratory Surveys

Overview

More than 650 clinical laboratories in the FoodNet surveillance area test specimens from ill persons. These laboratories differ in their routine testing practices for foodborne pathogens and in methods they use. Such differences may contribute to variation in the incidence rate of reported infections between FoodNet sites. To understand current practices and to monitor changes in practices over time, FoodNet conducts periodic surveys of all clinical laboratories within the surveillance area.

General surveys were conducted in 1995 (during the pilot phase of FoodNet surveillance), 1997, and 2000. Pathogen-specific surveys were conducted in 2005 and 2007. A brief summary of results, links to the survey protocols, questionnaires, and a list of publications describing results are included below.

Top of Page

General Surveys of Clinical Laboratory Practices – 1995, 1997 and 2000

In 1995, 1997 and 2000, surveys were conducted to describe laboratory methods and policies for the routine testing of stool specimens for Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Vibrio, Yersinia entercolitica, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Results showed that all or almost all laboratories routinely test for Salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter, but only about half routinely tested for E. coli O157:H7, Yersinia entercolitica, or Vibrio spp. In 2000, labs were also queried about testing practices for parasitic agents. Most laboratories sent specimens off site for parasitic screening and did not routinely test fecal specimens for Cryptosporidium species or Cyclospora cayetanensis unless requested by a physician.

References:

Voetsch AC, Angulo FJ, Rabatsky-Ehr TR, Shallow S, Cassidy M, Thomas SM, Swanson E, Zansky SM, Hawkins MA, Jones TF, Shillam PJ, Van Gilder TJ, Wells JG, Griffin PM. Laboratory practices for stool-specimen culture for bacterial pathogens, including Escherichia coli O157:H7, in the FoodNet sites, 1995-2000. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(Suppl 3):S190-197.

Jones JL, Lopez A, Wahlquist SP, Nadle J, Wilson M. Survey of clinical laboratory practices for parasitic diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(Suppl 3):S198-202.

Top of Page

Survey of Clinical Laboratory Practices regarding testing practices for Campylobacter, 2005

In 2005, a survey was conducted to describe laboratory characteristics, stool specimen collection methods, transport methods and times, and culture and incubation procedures used to isolate and identify Campylobacter. Results showed that adherence to existing recommendations for isolation and identification of Campylobacter varied substantially between laboratories and that many were using techniques likely to reduce their ability to isolate Campylobacter.

An electronic copy of the questionnaire and protocol is not currently available. Please use the contact information to the right to request a copy.

References:

Hurd S, Demma L, Tong X, et al; EIP FoodNet Working Group. Clinical laboratory practices for the identification of Campylobacter in FoodNet Sites: Do differences explain variation in incidence rates. [Abstract]. International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA, March 19-22, 2006.

Hurd S, Patrick M, Hatch J, Clogher P, Wymore K, Cronquist A, Segler S, Robinson T, Hanna S, Smith G, Fitzgerald C. Clinical Laboratory Practices for the Isolation and Identification of Campylobacter in Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) Sites: Baseline Information for Understanding Changes in Surveillance Data. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54 Suppl 5:S440-5.

Top of Page

Survey of Clinical Laboratory Practices regarding STEC, 2007

In 2007, a survey was conducted to describe culture-based and culture-independent testing practices for STEC identification. Results showed that most laboratories complied with recommendations for O157 STEC testing by culture but not with recommendations for detection of non-O157 STEC.

An electronic copy of the questionnaire and protocol is not currently available. Please use the contact information to the right to request a copy.

References:

Hoefer D, Hurd S, Medus C, Cronquist A, Hanna S, Hatch J, Hayes T, Larson K, Nicholson C, Wymore K, Tobin-D'Angelo M, Strockbine N, Snippes P, Atkinson R, Griffin PM, Gould LH; for the Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group. Laboratory practices for the identification of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in the United States, FoodNet Sites, 2007.Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011 Apr;8(4):555-60. Epub 2010 Dec 27.

Top of Page

 
Contact Us:
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    1600 Clifton Rd
    Atlanta, GA 30333
  • 800-CDC-INFO
    (800-232-4636)
    TTY: (888) 232-6348
  • Contact CDC–INFO
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO
A-Z Index
  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #