2013-2014 Influenza Season Week 47 ending November 23, 2013
All data are preliminary and may change as more reports are received.
During week 47 (November 17-23, 2013), influenza activity increased slightly in the United States.
- Viral Surveillance: Of 4,996 specimens tested and reported by U.S. World Health Organization (WHO) and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) collaborating laboratories during week 47, 397 (7.9%) were positive for influenza.
- Pneumonia and Influenza Mortality: The proportion of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I) was below the epidemic threshold.
- Influenza-Associated Pediatric Deaths: No influenza-associated pediatric deaths were reported.
- Outpatient Illness Surveillance: The proportion of outpatient visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) was 1.7%, below the national baseline of 2.0%. Two regions reported ILI at or above region-specific baseline levels. Two states experienced high ILI activity, one state experienced moderate ILI activity, one state experienced low ILI activity, 45 states and New York City experienced minimal ILI activity and the District of Columbia and one state had insufficient data.
- Geographic Spread of Influenza: The geographic spread of influenza in six states was reported as regional; 10 states reported local influenza activity; the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and 32 states reported sporadic influenza activity, and the U.S. Virgin Islands and two states reported no influenza activity.
A description of surveillance methods is available at: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/overview.htm
|HHS Surveillance Regions*||Data for current week||Data cumulative since September 29, 2013 (Week 40)|
|Out-patient ILI†||% positive for flu‡||Number of jurisdictions reporting regional or widespread activity§||2009 H1N1||A (H3)||A(Subtyping not performed)||B||Pediatric Deaths|
|Nation||Normal||7.9%||6 of 54||869||149||1,003||264||2|
|Region 1||Normal||1.5%||0 of 6||8||7||3||0||0|
|Region 2||Normal||1.9%||0 of 4||44||7||11||10||0|
|Region 3||Normal||2.0%||0 of 6||34||9||1||7||0|
|Region 4||Elevated||13.2%||4 of 8||232||2||846||167||1|
|Region 5||Normal||7.5%||0 of 6||95||19||12||8||0|
|Region 6||Elevated||7.4%||1 of 5||137||24||48||22||1|
|Region 7||Normal||3.3%||0 of 4||28||6||11||10||0|
|Region 8||Normal||11.8%||1 of 6||208||20||36||22||0|
|Region 9||Normal||4.0%||0 of 5||60||38||20||12||0|
|Region 10||Normal||2.9%||0 of 4||23||17||15||6||0|
*HHS regions (Region 1 CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT; Region 2: NJ, NY, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands; Region 3: DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV; Region 4: AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN; Region 5: IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI; Region 6: AR, LA, NM, OK, TX; Region 7: IA, KS, MO, NE; Region 8: CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY; Region 9: AZ, CA, Guam, HI, NV; and Region 10: AK, ID, OR, WA).
† Elevated means the % of visits for ILI is at or above the national or region-specific baseline
‡ National data are for current week; regional data are for the most recent three weeks
§ Includes all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands
WHO and NREVSS collaborating laboratories located in all 50 states, Puerto Rico, and Washington D.C. report to CDC the number of respiratory specimens tested for influenza and the number positive by influenza virus type and influenza A virus subtype. The results of tests performed during the current week are summarized in the table below.
Region specific data can be found at http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/fluportaldashboard.html.
|No. of specimens tested||4,996|
|No. of positive specimens (%)||397 (7.9%)|
|Positive specimens by type/subtype|
|Influenza A||348 (87.7%)|
|2009 H1N1||210 (60.3%)|
|Subtyping not performed||126 (36.2%)|
|Influenza B||49 (12.3%)|
CDC has antigenically characterized 83 influenza viruses [62 2009 H1N1 viruses, 20 influenza A (H3N2) viruses, and 1 influenza B virus] collected by U.S. laboratories since October 1, 2013 by hemagglutination inhibition (HI).
2009 H1N1 :
- All 62 2009 H1N1 viruses tested were characterized as A/California/7/2009-like, the influenza A (H1N1) component of the 2013-2014 Northern Hemisphere influenza vaccine.
Influenza A (H3N2) :
- All 20 influenza A (H3N2) viruses tested have been characterized as A/Texas/50/2012-like, the influenza A (H3N2) component of the 2013-2014 Northern Hemisphere influenza vaccine.
Influenza B (B/Yamagata and B/Victoria lineages) :
- Yamagata Lineage : The one influenza B virus tested was characterized as B/Massachusetts/02/2012-like, which is included as an influenza B component in both the 2013-2014 Northern Hemisphere trivalent and quadrivalent influenza vaccines.
Testing of 2009 H1N1, influenza A (H3N2), and influenza B virus isolates for resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir) is performed at CDC using a functional assay. Additional 2009 H1N1 and influenza A (H3N2) clinical samples are tested for mutations of the virus known to confer oseltamivir resistance. The data summarized below combine the results of both testing methods. These samples are routinely obtained for surveillance purposes rather than for diagnostic testing of patients suspected to be infected with antiviral-resistant virus.
High levels of resistance to the adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine) persist among 2009 influenza A (H1N1) and A (H3N2) viruses (the adamantanes are not effective against influenza B viruses). As a result, data from adamantane resistance testing are not presented below.
|Virus Samples tested (n)||Resistant Viruses, Number (%)||Virus Samples tested (n)||Resistant Viruses, Number (%)|
|Influenza A (H3N2)||42||0 (0.0)||42||0 (0.0)|
|Influenza B||9||0 (0.0)||9||0 (0.0)|
|2009 H1N1||217*||6 (2.8)||148||0 (0.0)|
*Includes specimens tested in national surveillance and additional specimens tested at public health laboratories in five states (AZ, HI, MI, NY, and WI) who share testing results with CDC.
The majority of currently circulating influenza viruses are susceptible to the neuraminidase inhibitor antiviral medications, oseltamivir and zanamivir; however, rare sporadic cases of oseltamivir-resistant 2009 H1N1 and A (H3N2) viruses have been detected worldwide. Antiviral treatment with oseltamivir or zanamivir is recommended as early as possible for patients with confirmed or suspected influenza who have severe, complicated, or progressive illness; who require hospitalization; or who are at greater risk for serious influenza-related complications. Additional information on recommendations for treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza virus infection with antiviral agents is available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/antivirals/index.htm.
During week 47, 5.8% of all deaths reported through the 122 Cities Mortality Reporting System were due to P&I. This percentage was below the epidemic threshold of 6.6% for week 47.
View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation
No influenza-associated pediatric deaths were reported to CDC during week 47. A total of two influenza-associated pediatric deaths for the 2013-2014 season have been reported.
Additional data can be found at http://gis.cdc.gov/GRASP/Fluview/PedFluDeath.html.
The Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET) conducts all age population-based surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalizations in select counties in the Emerging Infections Program (EIP) states and the Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Project (IHSP) states. FluSurv-NET estimated hospitalization rates will be updated weekly starting later this season. Additional FluSurv-NET data can be found at:http://gis.cdc.gov/GRASP/Fluview/FluHospRates.html and http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/FluHospChars.html.
Nationwide during week 47, 1.7% of patient visits reported through the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet) were due to influenza-like illness (ILI). This percentage is below the national baseline of 2.0%. (ILI is defined as fever (temperature of 100°F [37.8°C] or greater) and cough and/or sore throat.)
On a regional level, the percentage of outpatient visits for ILI ranged from 0.7% to 3.8% during week 47. Two regions (Regions 4 and 6) reported a proportion of outpatient visits for ILI at or above their region-specific baseline level.
Region specific data is available at http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/fluportaldashboard.html.
Data collected in ILINet are used to produce a measure of ILI activity* by state. Activity levels are based on the percent of outpatient visits in a state due to ILI and are compared to the average percent of ILI visits that occur during weeks with little or no influenza virus circulation. Activity levels range from minimal, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being below the average, to high, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being much higher than average.
During week 47, the following ILI activity levels were experienced:
- Two states experienced high ILI activity (Mississippi and Texas).
- One state experienced moderate ILI activity (Alabama).
- One state experienced low ILI activity (Louisiana).
- Forty-five states and New York City experienced minimal ILI activity (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).
- Data were insufficient to calculate an ILI activity level from the District of Columbia and one state (Montana).
*This map uses the proportion of outpatient visits to health care providers for influenza-like illness to measure the ILI activity level within a state. It does not, however, measure the extent of geographic spread of flu within a state. Therefore, outbreaks occurring in a single city could cause the state to display high activity levels.
Data collected in ILINet may disproportionately represent certain populations within a state, and therefore, may not accurately depict the full picture of influenza activity for the whole state.
Data displayed in this map are based on data collected in ILINet, whereas the State and Territorial flu activity map is based on reports from state and territorial epidemiologists. The data presented in this map is preliminary and may change as more data is received.
Differences in the data presented here by CDC and independently by some state health departments likely represent differing levels of data completeness with data presented by the state likely being the more complete.
The influenza activity reported by state and territorial epidemiologists indicates geographic spread of influenza viruses, but does not measure the severity of influenza activity.
During week 47, the following influenza activity was reported:
- Regional influenza activity was reported by six states (Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, Texas, and Utah).
- Local influenza activity was reported by 10 states (Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Virginia).
- Sporadic influenza activity was reported by the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and 32 states (Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).
- No influenza activity was reported by the U.S. Virgin Islands and two states (Maine and Vermont).
Additional National and International Influenza Surveillance Information
FluView Interactive: FluView includes enhanced web-based interactive applications that can provide dynamic visuals of the influenza data collected and analyzed by CDC. These FluView Interactive applications allow people to create customized, visual interpretations of influenza data, as well as make comparisons across flu seasons, regions, age groups and a variety of other demographics. To access these tools visit http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/fluviewinteractive.htm.
U.S. State and local influenza surveillance: Click on a jurisdiction below to access the latest local influenza information.
Google Flu Trends: Google Flu Trends uses aggregated Google search data in a model created in collaboration with CDC to estimate influenza activity in the United States. For more information and activity estimates from the U.S. and worldwide, see http://www.google.org/flutrends/
Europe: for the most recent influenza surveillance information from Europe, please see WHO/Europe at http://www.euroflu.org/index.php and visit the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control at http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/surveillance_reports/influenza/Pages/weekly_influenza_surveillance_overview.aspx
Public Health Agency of Canada: The most up-to-date influenza information from Canada is available at http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/fluwatch/
Health Protection Agency (United Kingdom): The most up-to-date influenza information from the United Kingdom is available at http://www.hpa.org.uk/Topics/InfectiousDiseases/InfectionsAZ/SeasonalInfluenza/
Any links provided to non-Federal organizations are provided solely as a service to our users. These links do not constitute an endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the Federal Government, and none should be inferred. CDC is not responsible for the content of the individual organization web pages found at these links.
A description of surveillance methods is available at: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/overview.htm