Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 5—May 2011
Dispatch

Novel Bluetongue Virus Serotype from Kuwait

Figures
Article Metrics
204
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Institute for Animal Health, Woking, UK (S. Maan, N.S. Maan, K. Nomikou, C. Batten, F. Antony, M.N. Belaganahalli, C.A.L. Oura, P.P.C. Mertens); Public Authority of Agriculture Affairs and Fish Resources, Kuwait City, Kuwait (A.M. Samy, A.A. Reda, S.A. Al-Rashid, M. El Batel); Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt (A.M. Samy)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Sheep and goats sampled in Kuwait during February 2010 were seropositive for bluetongue virus (BTV). BTV isolate KUW2010/02, from 1 of only 2 sheep that also tested positive for BTV by real-time reverse transcription–PCR, caused mild clinical signs in sheep. Nucleotide sequencing identified KUW2010/02 as a novel BTV serotype.

Bluetongue virus (BTV) infects ruminants, camelids, and occasionally large carnivores. Clinical signs of bluetongue disease (BT) are usually more severe in sheep or white-tailed deer, particularly in populations previously unexposed to the virus; cattle and goats are often asymptomatic (1). Initial diagnosis of BT based on clinical signs can be confirmed by virus isolation and characterization or identification of viral RNA by reverse transcription PCR.

BTV particles contain 3 concentric protein layers surrounding 10 linear double-stranded RNA genome segments, identified as segment-1 to segment-10 (Seg-1 to Seg-10) in order of decreasing size (from 3,954 bp to 822 bp) (2). Twenty-five BTV serotypes have been identified on the basis of the specificity of reactions with neutralizing antibodies generated by their mammalian hosts (3). Consequently, BTV outer capsid proteins, particularly viral protein (VP) 2 (encoded by Seg-2), show sequence variations that determine virus serotype (4). Other BTV proteins, including subcore shell protein VP3(T2) encoded by Seg-3, are more highly conserved (2). Phylogenetic comparisons of Seg-3 sequences have been used to identify different BTV topotypes and distinguish different Orbivirus species (4).

BTV has been reported in several Middle Eastern countries (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Turkey, Cyprus, and Iraq) since 1951 (5). In 2008, Egypt reported the absence of BT, and Egypt is the only country in the region to have prohibited BTV vaccination (5). Iran reported outbreaks of BT in 2008, and Saudi Arabia reported infection without clinical signs, although the serotype(s) were not identified (5). Multiple serotypes were detected in Israel during 2008 (5) and Oman in 2009 (S. Maan et al., unpub. data). We report characterization of a novel BTV serotype identified in Kuwait in 2010.

The Study

During February 2010, sheep and goats in the Abdali region of Kuwait, close to the Iraq border, showed the following clinical signs consistent with BT: lameness, coughing, mouth lesions, stillbirth, congenital abnormalities, pneumonia, enteritis, and hepatitis. Forty-six of 48 serum samples were positive for BTV-specific antibodies by competitive ELISA (Investcare-Vet, London, UK) at the Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory and Animal Research Center in Kuwait, or by double antigen-recognition ELISA (ID Vet, Montpellier, France) at the Institute for Animal Health in the United Kingdom.

Twenty-six EDTA-treated blood samples, 4 spleens, and 1 liver sent for analysis for BTV to the World Organisation for Animal Health reference laboratory at the Institute for Animal Health (Woking, UK) all gave negative results by real-time reverse transcription–PCR (rRT-PCR) targeting either BTV Seg-1 (6) or Seg-1 and Seg-5 (7). However, 2 blood samples (from animals 364 and 374) were positive in assays selective for Seg-10 (8), with cycle threshold (Ct) values of 35 and 28, respectively. Previous attempts to isolate BTV from blood samples with Ct values >32 were usually unsuccessful, and no further work was done with animal 364. Washed blood from animal 374 (reference collection sample KUW2010/01) (9) was injected into embryonated chicken eggs. Although no hemorrhages were detected, the virus was passaged twice in BHK-21 cells (isolate KUW2010/02), producing atypical cytopathic effects.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Electrophoretic analysis of genomic double-stranded RNAs from the Orbivirus species and mammalian orthoreoviruses. Bluetongue virus double stranded RNA preparations were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide and visualized by exposure to ultraviolet light. Genome segments are numbered, in order of decreasing molecular weight. DNA markers were run (lanes M) to enable estimation of molecular weights. Lane 1, orthoreovirus (MOR2004/01); 2

Figure 1. Electrophoretic analysis of genomic double-stranded RNAs from the Orbivirus species and mammalian orthoreoviruses. Bluetongue virus double stranded RNA preparations were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg/mL...

KUW2010/02 RNA analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis generated a genome segment migration pattern (electropherotype) typical of BTV (Figure 1). Although KUW2010/02 was negative by BTV-specific rRT-PCR selective for Seg-1 (6), it had Ct values of 16.8 in Seg-10–specific assays (8). Identification of KUW2010/02 as BTV was confirmed by indirect antigen-sandwich ELISA selective for core protein VP7(T13) (10) with optical density at 490 nm values >0.15 (equivalent BTV titer of 6.75 log10 50% tissue culture infective dose/mL).

RNA from KUW2010/01 and KUW2010/02, extracted by using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (11), gave uniformly negative results by type-specific rRT-PCRs targeting Seg-2 of BTV serotypes 1–25 (kits supplied by Laboratoire Service International, Lissieu, France). However, full-length cDNA copies of Seg-2 (2,929 bp) and Seg-3 (2,773 bp) from KUW2010/02 were synthesized and then sequenced as described (11), showing conserved terminal regions typical of BTV (5′-GUUAAA...........ACUUAC-3′) (2). BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) analysis of KUW2010/02 Seg-2 and Seg-3 sequences (GenBank accession nos. HM590642 and HM590643) showed highest identity with equivalent genome segments of other BTVs, although for Seg-2 the search algorithm was changed from megablast (highly similar sequences) to blastn (somewhat similar sequences).

Phylogenetic analysis of KUW2010/02 Seg-3/VP3(T2), conducted by using neighbor-joining methods and p-distance matrices (12), showed nucleotide/amino acid identity levels of 73.7%/87.6% to 76.6% /88.9% with other BTVs. Seg-3 of none of the previously characterized BTVs showed close relationships to KUW2010/02; BTV-1/GRE2001/05 and BTV-25/TOV were most closely related (GenBank accession nos. DQ186822 and GQ982523, respectively), which indicates that KUW2010/02 represents a distinct geographic cluster or topotype (4).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Neighbor-joining tree showing relationships between genome segment-2 (Seg-2) from KUW2010/02 with the 25 reference strains of different bluetongue virus (BTV) serotypes. The tree was constructed by using distance matrices, generated by using the p-distance determination algorithm in MEGA 4.1 (500 bootstrap replicates) (12). The 10 evolutionary branching points are indicated by black dots on the tree (along with their bootstrap values), which correlate with the 11 Seg-2 nucleotypes d

Figure 2. Neighbor-joining tree showing relationships between genome segment-2 (Seg-2) from KUW2010/02 with the 25 reference strains of different bluetongue virus (BTV) serotypes. The tree was constructed by using distance matrices, generated by...

Seg-2/VP2 of KUW2010/02 showed nucleotide/amino acid identity levels of 42.8%/28.3% to 63.9%/61.5% with previously recognized BTV serotypes and was most closely related to BTV-25 (nucleotype K, Figure 2). Reference strains of BTV-10 and BTV-17 from the United States (nucleotype A) were the next most closely related, with 61.8%/58.1% and 62%/57.7% nt/aa identity, respectively. This places KUW2010/02 as a distinct virus type within a novel 12th Seg-2 nucleotype L (4; Figure 2). ClustalX (www.clustal.org) alignments and neighbor-joining trees also confirmed the identity of KUW2010/02 as a BTV. Virus neutralization tests of KUW2010/02 (13) that used reference guinea pig immune serum against BTV types 1–24 and antiserum from goats previously infected with BTV-25 showed no reduction in KUW2010/02 infectivity (data not shown), demonstrating that it does not belong to BTV serotypes 1–25.

Conclusions

Most serum samples tested from sheep and goats in Kuwait showing clinical signs of disease were seropositive for BTV-specific antibodies. However, BTV RNA was detected in only 2 sheep serum samples (animals 364 and 374), suggesting that the clinical signs were not caused by ongoing BTV infection. All samples were also tested for peste des petits ruminants virus by rRT-PCR (14), but results were uniformly negative.

BTV RNA was detected by using a BTV Seg-10–specific rRT-PCR (8) previously used to detect BTV-25 in Switzerland (15). However, BTV Seg-1–specific or Seg-1– and Seg-5–specific assays (6,7) failed to detect KUW2010/02, identifying it is an unusual or atypical BTV strain. Alignment of the Seg-1–specific and Seg-5–specific primers and probes with KUW2010/02 sequences identified numerous mismatches that would prevent detection of the viral RNA (data not shown). However, the probe and primers designed by Orrù et al. (8) showed a perfect match with Seg-10 of KUW2010/02, demonstrating the need for appropriate rRT-PCR protocols to detect this virus. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of KUW2010/02 genome segments generated a migration pattern typical of BTV (Figure 1). Levels of nucleotide/amino acid identity of Seg-3 (up to 76.6%/89%) of KUW2010/02 with other BTV isolates also identified it as BTV.

At peak viremia, a previously unexposed sheep infected with a virulent BTV strain could be expected to show Ct values ≈20. The Ct of 28 obtained with blood of animal 374 (KUW2010/01) indicates a low viremia, suggesting that the severe clinical signs observed were not caused by BTV. Experimental infection of previously unexposed sheep with KUW2010/02 also caused only mild clinical signs (data not shown).

Different isolates of a single BTV serotype show >68.4%/72.6% nt/aa identity in Seg-2/VP2, with 40.5%/22.1% to 71.5%/77.8% identity between different serotypes (4). KUW2010/02 showed only 42.8%/28.3% to 63.9%/61.5% identity in Seg-2/VP2 with recognized BTV serotypes, consistent with membership of a novel 26th BTV type and Seg-2 nucleotype (L) (4). These conclusions were supported by virus neutralization test results. The sequence data presented here will help support development of new diagnostic tools (RT-PCR–based typing assays) to determine the incidence and distribution of this novel serotype, as well as natural reservoir(s) and insect vectors.

Dr Sushila Maan is a veterinarian and senior postdoctoral researcher in the Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme at the Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright, UK. Her current research interests include characterization of BTV and the molecular epidemiology and diagnosis of BTV infection and other related orbiviruses.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank international colleagues who provided virus isolates for analyses and comparisons.

This study received funding support from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK; the European Commission (OrbiVac grant no. 245266; WildTech grant no. 222633-2); Emerging and Major Infectious Diseases of Livestock grant OrbiNet K1303206; World Organisation for Animal Health; and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK.

Top

References

  1. Darpel  KE, Batten  CA, Veronesi  E, Shaw  AE, Anthony  S, Bachanek-Bankowska  K, Clinical signs and pathology shown by British sheep and cattle infected with bluetongue virus serotype 8 derived from the 2006 outbreak in northern Europe. Vet Rec. 2007;161:25361. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Attoui  H, Maan  S, Anthony  SJ, Mertens  PPC. Bluetongue virus, other orbiviruses and other reoviruses: their relationships and taxonomy. In: Mellor PS, Baylis M, Mertens PPC, editors. Bluetongue monograph. 1st ed. London: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2009. p. 23–52.
  3. Mertens  PPC, Pedley  S, Cowley  J, Burroughs  JN, Corteyn  AH, Jeggo  MH, Analysis of the roles of bluetongue virus outer capsid proteins VP2 and VP5 in determination of virus serotype. Virology. 1989;170:5615. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Maan  S, Maan  NS, van Rijn  PA, van Gennip  RGP, Sanders  A, Wright  IM, Full genome characterisation of bluetongue virus serotype 6 from the Netherlands 2008 and comparison to other field and vaccine strains. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10323. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. World Organisation for Animal Health. OIE 2009: final report of the 10th conference of the OIE Regional Commission for the Middle East Doha (Qatar), 26–29 October 2009 [cited 2011 Mar 11]. http://www.rr-middleeast.oie.int/download/pdf/Final%20Report_Doha_%20Qatar.pdf
  6. Shaw  AE, Monaghan  P, Alpar  HO, Anthony  S, Darpel  KE, Batten  CA, Development and validation of a real-time RT-PCR assay to detect genome bluetongue virus segment 1. J Virol Methods. 2007;145:11526. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Toussaint  JF, Sailleau  C, Bréard  E, Zientara  S, De Clercq  K. Bluetongue virus detection by two real-time RT-qPCRs targeting two different genomic segments. J Virol Methods. 2007;140:11523. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Orrù  G, Ferrando  ML, Meloni  M, Liciardi  M, Savini  G, De Santis  P. Rapid detection and quantitation of bluetongue virus (BTV) using a molecular beacon fluorescent probe assay. J Virol Methods. 2006;137:3442. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mertens  PPC, Attoui  H. Isolates of bluetongue virus (BTV) in the dsRNA virus collection at IAH Pirbright [updated 2010 Jun 23; cited 2010 Jul 25]. http://www.reoviridae.org/dsRNA_virus_proteins/ReoID/BTV-isolates.htm.
  10. Thevasagayam  JA, Wellby  MP, Mertens  PP, Burroughs  JN, Anderson  J. Detection and differentiation of epizootic haemorrhagic disease of deer and bluetongue viruses by serogroup-specific sandwich ELISA. J Virol Methods. 1996;56:4957. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Maan  S, Rao  S, Maan  NS, Anthony  SJ, Attoui  H, Samuel  AR, Rapid cDNA synthesis and sequencing techniques for the genetic study of bluetongue and other dsRNA viruses. J Virol Methods. 2007a;143:1329. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tamura  K, Dudley  J, Nei  M, Kumar  S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:15969. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Grist  NR, Ross  CA, Bell  EJ. Neutralization tests. In: Grist NR, Ross CA, Bell EJ, editors. Diagnostic methods in clinical virology, 2nd ed. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1974. p. 64–79.
  14. Batten  CA, Banyard  A, King  D, Henstock  M, Edwards  L, Sanders  A, A real-time PCR assay for the specific detection of peste des petits ruminants virus. J Virol Methods. 2011;171:4014. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofmann  MA, Renzullo  S, Mader  M, Chaignat  V, Worwa  G, Thuer  B. Genetic characterization of Toggenburg orbivirus, a new bluetongue virus from goats Switzerland. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:185561. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1705.101742

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 5—May 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Peter P.C. Mertens, Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, Institute for Animal Health, Ash Rd, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: August 14, 2011
Page updated: August 14, 2011
Page reviewed: August 14, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external