 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Dimensions of the Social Environment: Political
Overview
Community political participation have been found to be associated
with population health status. Davey Smith and Dorling (1996), showed that in England and Wales, mortality rates in electoral constituencies
were negatively correlated with Conservative voting patterns and positively
correlated with Labour voting. Area deprivation was also negatively associated
with Conservative voting but positively associated with Labour voting. The
authors concluded that in areas with better material circumstances and more
optimal health, voters were more likely to support leadership that favors
reducing public assistance programs. In the United States, Blakely and
colleagues (2001) studied disparities among states in voting across
socioeconomic status groups. Individuals living in states with the highest
voting inequality were shown to have increased odds of fair or poor self–rated
health relative to those in other states. They reasoned that disproportionate
political participation by the more economically well off skews subsequent
policymaking towards their interests, a conclusion supported in the political
science literature (Hill and Leighley 1992).
More broadly, political participation has been of recent interest as an
indicator of embeddedness in the institutions of civil society. It is
considered to be a reflection of social capital within a community (Kawachi
1999). Social capital, measured in several different ways, has been associated
with positive health outcomes (Subramanian and Kawachi and Kennedy 2001; Kawachi
and Kennedy and Glass 1999a; Kawachi et al. 1997) (see the Psychosocial
Dimension, page 51, for further discussion of the social capital concept).
Within the political contextual dimension, we include aspects of political
participation such as voting and political party membership, as well as
donations to parties and candidates, which are known to influence public policy
(Ferguson 1995). Likewise the degree to which elected officials are
representative of their areas in terms of gender and race/ethnicity may be an
important factor in their responsiveness to constituents’ needs (Whitby 1997;
Bratton and Haynie 1999). The percent of the local budget devoted to public
health investments can be considered an indication of the priority placed on
health by the community as well as a measure of available fiscal resources. We
also include the number and influence of various politically active community
groups.
This table describes the components and indicators of the political
dimension. Three political components are identified:
- Civic Participation
- Political Structure
- Power Groups
Within each component, several indicators are identified, and for each
indicator at least one data set is listed.
One or more of the
following files are available in Portable Document Format (PDF).
Learn more about
PDFs.
| Components and Indicators |
Data Sources and Notes |
|
1. Civic Participation: Voting |
|
Voting and registration rates: Votes cast for
president, by party |
USA Counties
Data available on CD–ROM; online data for single counties downloadable
as text or comma–separated–value file. |
|
Voting and registration rates: Percent of persons
registered to vote and voting by race/ethnicity |
Census
Bureau (PDF 455K)
State data in PDF format. |
|
Ease of registration: Voter registration by mail
allowed; registration deadline prior to election |
Moving and
Relocation Sourcebook and Directory (http://www.omnigraphics.com)
Hardcover book available for purchase. |
|
Racial/ethnic representativeness of registered
voters |
See voting
and registration rates above. |
|
Civic Participation: Census participation |
|
Census response rates |
Census Bureau |
|
Civic Participation: Political party membership |
|
Political party membership |
See voting and registration rates above. |
|
Civic Participation: Donations to parties and candidates |
|
Donations to Republican and Democratic
candidates, parties, and political action committees |
Center for Responsive Politics*
Contributions for selected metropolitan areas, zip codes, and states. |
|
2. Political Structure: Gender/racial/ethnic
representation in elected office |
|
Women in governing body |
Carpenter, A. 1996. Facts About the Cities. New York: HW Wilson. |
|
Elected officials in local governments by sex, race,
and state |
Census of Governments
From this Web site page, select Census of Governments for 1992; select
Vol. 1, No. 2, Popularly Elected Officials. Available in PDF format. |
|
Percent of women in statewide elective office |
Center for American Women
and Politics* |
|
Blacks in elected office |
Joint Center for
Political and Economic Studies DataBank* |
|
Political Structure: Percent of local budget for public health
investments |
|
Expenditures for health and welfare |
Census of Governments
From this Web site page, select year of interest; select Vol. 4, No. 3,
Finances of County Governments, or No. 4, Finances of Municipal and
Township Governments. Downloadable spreadsheet or comma–separated–value
files available. |
|
3. Power Groups: Community organizations |
|
Number and size of organizations: religious,
political, civic and social, social advocacy, human rights,
environmental and wildlife, business, labor, grant making and giving |
County
Business Patterns
From this Web site page, select County, State, U.S., ZIP or MSA
Database on a NAICS Basis. Select area of interest; in Number of
Establishments table select detail for Industry Code 81, Other
Services. Data downloadable as text or comma–separated–value tables;
CD–ROM also available. |
|
Power Groups: Unions |
|
Unions |
See Employment Dimension, Workforce
Characteristics |
*Links to non–Federal organizations are provided solely as a service to our users. Links do not constitute an endorsement of any organization by CDC or the Federal Government, and none should be inferred. The CDC is not responsible for the content of the individual organization Web pages found at this link.
Date last reviewed:
08/11/2006
Content source: Division for Heart Disease and Stroke
Prevention,
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion |
|
|
|