Skip Navigation Links
  Home | About CDC | Press Room | A-Z Index | Contact Us
CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Home Page
CDC en Español
CyberView Home
Master Context Diagram
Business Use Case Diagram
Operations Use Case Diagram
Domain Diagram
Hospital Registry Functions
Hospital Data Sources
Central Cancer Registries
National Cancer Programs/Organizations
Diagram Conventions
Site Map

Hospital Casefinding Data Flow Diagram

PDF Icon Hospital Casefinding Data Flow Diagram (PDF-133KB)

The NPCR–AERRO Hospital Casefinding Data Flow Diagram is a type of Unified Modeling Language (UML) activity diagram. Activity diagrams—

  • Show the procedural flow of control of a business process.
  • Are similar to a flowchart, as each flow can be mapped from activity to activity.

In NPCR–AERRO, each second-level function in the operations use case diagram has or will have an activity diagram showing the registry's business process flow.

The NPCR–AERRO Hospital Casefinding and Passive Follow-Up Data Flow Diagram shows the steps in the automated process from the time the hospital registry receives the event report (from hospital and non-hospital data sources) to the time the hospital registry stores the event report.

A text description of the diagram and legend may be found below. For information about reading diagrams, see Diagram Conventions.

Hospital Casefinding Data Flow Diagram

Data Flow Diagram Legend

Legend for Data Flow Diagram

There are three actors: the data source, the registrar, and the hospital cancer registry (CR) software.

The process starts when the data source sends an event report to the hospital CR software, which stores the event report in the to-be-processed table. If the event report is a corrected or duplicate report, the software sends it to the appropriate holding table.

The CR software checks to see if the event report belongs to a patient who already exists in the CR database. The registrar performs a review if the software cannot make a determination. If there is a patient match, follow-up information from the event report is added to the existing abstract.

The CR software then determines whether the event report is relevant for cancer. If it is not relevant for cancer, the software sends it to the ArchiveEventReportTable. If it is relevant for cancer, the registrar determines whether the event report is reportable. The registrar may contact the data source to make the determination. The software sends the event report to the ToBeAbstractedTable if it is reportable, or to the ArchivedEventReportTable if it is not reportable.

Business Rules (BR) and Software Requirements (SR)

For details, please refer to the Hospital Casefinding Use Case (PDF-204KB).

  • BR01 and BR03 apply to determining cancer relevance and reportability.
  • BR02 applies to adding follow-up information.
  • SR01, SR02 and SR03 apply to table and data element requirements and to tracking requirements.

PDF Icon Please note: Some of these publications are available for download only as *.pdf files. These files require Adobe Acrobat Reader in order to be viewed. Please review the information on downloading and using Acrobat Reader software.

Page last reviewed: May 5, 2011
Page last updated: May 5, 2011
Content source: Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
  Home | Policies and Regulations | Disclaimer | e-Government | FOIA | Contact Us
Safer, Healthier People

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A.
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348, 24 Hours/Every Day - DHHS Department of Health
and Human Services