Skip Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

BRFSS Home | Contact Us



BRFSS Contents


Item: Prevalence Data
Item: SMART: City and County Data
Item: BRFSS Maps
Item: Web Enabled Analysis Tool (WEAT)
Item: Trends Data
Item: Chronic Disease Indicators (CDI)
Item: About the BRFSS
Item: BRFSS Datasets (downloads and documentation)
Item: Chronic Disease and the Environment
Item: Questionnaires
Item: FAQs
Item: State Information
Item: Publications and Research
Item: Training
Item: Site Map
Item: Related Links







Notes for Data Users

2001 Data Limitations

The BRFSS is a cross-sectional surveillance survey currently involving 54 reporting areas. It is important to note that any survey will have natural variation over sample sites; therefore, some variation between states is to be expected. The complex sample design and the multiple reporting areas complicate the analysis of the BRFSS. Although CDC works with the states to minimize deviations, in 2001 there were some deviations in sampling and weighting protocols, sample size, response rates, and collection or processing procedures. In addition, California’s questionnaire had a few minor differences in wording of question. The following section identifies other known variations for the 2001 data year.

A. 2001 Data Anomalies and Deviations from Sampling Frame and Weighting Protocols

In several states, a portion of sample records intended for use during one month was completed in another month. This deviation will disproportionately affect analyses based on monthly, rather than annual data.

Several states did not collect data for all 12 months of the year or completed interviews in calendar year 2002. Florida, Hawaii, and Texas did not report any interviews in January. New Jersey and the U.S. Virgin Islands did not complete any interviews in January or February. The District of Columbia did not complete any interviews in January, February, or March. Nevada completed 302 interviews in January or February 2002. Illinois, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Wisconsin had small numbers of completed interviews in January, 2002.

More information about the quality of the survey data can be found in the 2001 BRFSS Summary Data Quality Report.







B. Other 2001 limitations of the data

Telephone coverage (households with telephones) varies by state and also by sub-population. Telephone coverage averages 94.5% for U.S. states as a whole, but ranges from 1.8% noncoverage in Delaware, to 13.3% in New Mexico. It is estimated that 10% of households in Puerto Rico are without telephones.

More information about telephone coverage can be found in the 2001 BRFSS Summary Data Quality Report.

Illinois
Illinois used a dual questionnaire and collected data on core items involving immunization, cholesterol awareness, hypertension awareness, arthritis, firearms, disability, physical activity, prostate cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, and HIV/AIDS knowledge and prevention, and a module on fruit and vegetable consumption on approximately half of respondents. Fruit and vegetable consumption questions were not asked in August but were asked of all respondents in December. Questions on hypertension awareness, cholesterol awareness, arthritis, immunization, firearms, disability, physical activity, prostate cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, and HIV/AIDS knowledge and prevention were asked of all eligible respondents in August.

California
California modified the wording of the health plan, diabetes, and the frequency of alcohol consumption questions. These questions may have limited comparability to those of other reporting areas. Several states that used the Tobacco Indicators module inappropriately skipped question 6 (HOUSESMK) in the module for part of the year. The HOUSESMK field was left blank in these states if the question was not asked. The Tobacco Indicators module has a second problem where several states skipped question 4 (GETCARE ) when question 3 (LASTSMK) had a response of 1, 2, 3, or 4. In some states the affected records were coded, 9 Refused, even though the respondents were not asked the questions, other states left the field blank.

The number of affected records by state and months for question 6, HOUSESMK are

State Month(s) Frequency
AK January–February 177
KY January 249
LA January–February 370
MS January–February 192
MT January 123
NE January–September 1263
OK January–March 272
SD February–March 243
WV January–February 206

The number of affected records by state and months for question 4, GETCARE are

State Month(s) Frequency
AK January 6
AZ January–December 74
AR January–April 21
IN January–March 22
KY January 12
LA January–February 22
ME January–December 63
MS January 7
MT January–February 13
NE February, June–September 30
NJ January–December 131
OK January–May 48
PA January–April 19
RI January–December 109
SC January–October 56
SD January–March 14
VA January–December 65
WY January–May 19

More information about survey item nonresponse can be found in the 2001 BRFSS Summary Data Quality Report.

Notes for Data Users library

 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996






Policies and Regulations | BRFSS Home | Contact Us

CDC Home
| Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page last reviewed June 22, 2005

United States Department of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Division of Adult and Community Health