2011 Child Asthma Data: Prevalence Tables
| State | Male Sample Size |
Male Prevalence |
Male Standard Error |
Male 95% CI * |
Female Sample Size |
Female Prevalence |
Female Standard Error |
Female 95% CI * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total ** | 18,399 | 9.8 | 0.49 | (8.9 – 10.8) | 17,174 | 7.6 | 0.37 | (6.9 – 8.4) |
| AZ | 704 | 9.3 | 1.58 | (6.6 – 12.9) | 622 | 7.8 | 1.58 | (5.2 – 11.5) |
| CT | 880 | 11.5 | 1.35 | (9.1 – 14.4) | 804 | 11.3 | 1.61 | (8.5 – 14.8) |
| HI | 936 | 12.9 | 1.26 | (10.6 – 15.6) | 827 | 8.9 | 1.24 | (6.8 – 11.7) |
| MI | 1,283 | 9.8 | 1.08 | (7.9 – 12.1) | 1,293 | 10.2 | 1.06 | (8.3 – 12.5) |
| MT | 1,210 | 7.5 | 1.09 | (5.7 – 10.0) | 1,082 | 6.0 | 0.91 | (4.5 – 8.0) |
| NJ | 1,982 | 9.7 | 0.87 | (8.2 – 11.6) | 1,899 | 7.7 | 0.74 | (6.4 – 9.3) |
| NM | 1,102 | 10.8 | 1.03 | (9.0 – 13.0) | 1,077 | 9.4 | 1.13 | (7.4 – 11.9) |
| OR | 631 | 9.3 | 1.31 | (7.0 – 12.2) | 584 | 9.6 | 1.47 | (7.1 – 12.9) |
| PA | 1,198 | 13.2 | 1.21 | (11.0 – 15.8) | 1,169 | 6.9 | 0.81 | (5.5 – 8.7) |
| TN | 462 | 14.3 | 5.47 | (6.5 – 28.6) | 439 | 5.0 | 1.46 | (2.8 – 8.8) |
| TX | 1,915 | 8.6 | 0.92 | (7.0 – 10.6) | 1,744 | 7.4 | 0.95 | (5.8 – 9.5) |
| UT | 2,455 | 7.6 | 0.59 | (6.5 – 8.8) | 2,227 | 5.9 | 0.55 | (4.9 – 7.1) |
| VT | 829 | 9.9 | 1.15 | (7.9 – 12.4) | 733 | 6.2 | 0.96 | (4.5 – 8.3) |
| WA | 1,640 | 7.9 | 1.00 | (6.2 – 10.1) | 1,565 | 6.3 | 0.90 | (4.7 – 8.3) |
| WV | 598 | 7.9 | 1.24 | (5.8 – 10.7) | 554 | 7.7 | 1.31 | (5.5 – 10.7) |
| WI | 574 | 8.8 | 1.45 | (6.4 – 12.1) | 555 | 6.4 | 1.26 | (4.3 – 9.4) |
| Territories | ||||||||
| PR | 647 | 13.0 | 1.72 | (9.9 – 16.7) | 575 | 14.4 | 2.19 | (10.6 – 19.3) |
Notes:
* CI denotes confidence interval.
** Total includes data from 16 states based on cellphone and landline data combined excludes the territory,
Puerto Rico.
If values for the standard error and the 95% confidence interval are not provided, the normal approximation
to the binomial distribution does not apply due to small sample size.
When the sample size is less than 50, estimates are not precise and should be interpreted with caution.
View Page In: PDF [82K]
Page last reviewed: July 30, 2013
Content source: National Center for Environmental Health