Volume
8: No. 1, January 2011
Priscilla R. Sanderson, PhD, CRC; Neil Weinstein, PhD; Nicolette Teufel-Shone, PhD; María Elena Martínez, PhD
Suggested citation for this article: Sanderson PR, Weinstein N, Teufel-Shone N, Martínez ME. Assessing colorectal cancer screening knowledge at tribal fairs. Prev Chronic Dis 2011;8(1):A16.
http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2011/jan/09_0213.htm. Accessed [date].
PEER REVIEWED
Abstract
Introduction
Increasing public awareness and knowledge about the need for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among American Indians is key to reducing health disparities. The objective of this study
was to assess Navajo adults’ knowledge of CRC risk factors and prevention, CRC screening, and self-reported experience with CRC screening.
Methods
We collected data generated by a self-administered survey given to Navajo adults, most of whom lived on the reservation. Data were collected at 2 annual tribal fairs in 2006. Fair attendees who visited an exhibit booth completed a CRC knowledge survey. The study design was nonrandomized.
Results
Of the 285 Navajo adults who participated, most were bilingual (74%) and female (80%). Of the respondents aged 50 years or older, 77% had heard of CRC screening and 28% reported being screened for colon or colorectal cancer. Knowledge was high (mean, 5.78 [standard deviation (SD), 1.28]) (8.0 was the highest possible knowledge score). Respondents with little or no formal schooling had lower scores (mean, 5.4), indicating less knowledge of CRC
and associated screening tests than did those with more education (mean, 6.0).
Conclusion
Among a sample of Navajo adults aged 50 years or older, participants with more education were more likely to be knowledgeable about CRC and to have received screening.
This survey, led by a Navajo investigator with Navajo surveyors, revealed a high
awareness of CRC and screening, but overall CRC screening was low. CRC education for Navajo adults who have little or no formal schooling should be improved.
Back to top
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of death for American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) (1). In addition, AI/ANs are less likely to be diagnosed at early stages of CRC
(59.6%) than non-Hispanic whites (66.5%) (1,2). Wiggins et al reported an age-adjusted incidence rate of colon and rectum
cancer of 46/100,000 for Indian Health Service (IHS) Contract Health Service Delivery Area (CHSDA) counties, where
misclassification of AI/AN race occurs less frequently than in other areas of the country (3). This rate is
lower than that reported for non-Hispanic whites (50.8/100,000) (3). Using data from the Behaviorial Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), Espey
and colleagues reported that AI/ANs aged 50 years or older residing in the southwestern IHS region had a 12% fecal occult blood test (FOBT)
uptake within the past year and 21%
had endoscopy within the past 5 years (1).
We assessed Navajo adults’ knowledge of CRC risk factors and prevention, CRC screening, and self-reported experience with CRC screening. The aims were to determine 1) what proportion of this population had heard about CRC and CRC screening; 2) what proportion of people older than 50 self-reported having been screened; and 3) the relationship between knowledge of CRC and screening by variables such as age, sex, education, and English-language proficiency.
Back to top
Methods
The bilingual Navajo surveyors led by the Navajo principal investigator (P.R.S.) recruited Navajo adults who attended the fair exhibits at the 95th Annual Northern Navajo Fair from September 28 through October 1, 2006, and the 38th Annual To’Nanees’Dizi’ Fair from October 11 through 15, 2006. We recruited volunteers to complete a brief anonymous assessment of CRC screening knowledge
(Appendix). The Navajo respondents were addressed in their preferred language when they approached the
booth and spoke either English or Navajo to the Navajo research team.
We based survey development on the health belief model’s constructs of perceived susceptibility and perceived benefits of prevention (4), the literature on brief health surveys with underserved populations (5-7), and the National Cancer Institute
web page on CRC screening. Questions were built on those used previously in surveys of CRC screening (8-11) with recommendations from the Navajo project advisory committee.
A Navajo project advisory committee composed of representatives from the Navajo Division of Health’s Navajo Breast and Cervical Cancer Project, Community Health Representatives (CHRs), and Northern Navajo Medical Center’s Health Promotion Program assisted with cultural relevancy in the survey. The primary author (P.R.S.) met several times with the Navajo project advisory committee for feedback on the survey drafts. This committee of 6 members recommended adding the following
items: 1) a question on general health, 2) a “don’t know” option on the multiple choice questions,
3) age-group choices, and 4) an open-ended highest-education question that allowed the respondents to write in the highest level of education attained.
The 16-item survey included a multiple choice question about general health, a yes or no question about
“ever heard” the terms “colon cancer or colorectal cancer,” and a self-report question about experience with CRC. Five questions addressed perceived susceptibility to CRC related to sex, age, family history, and lifestyle; 2 questions asked about prevention; 1 about symptoms; and 5 about demographic status (sex, tribal affiliation, age group, highest level of education attained, and
language spoken on a daily basis).
Respondents self-administered the paper-and-pencil questionnaire, which was written in English. We administered the questionnaire
orally in Navajo if requested.
The University of Arizona Human Subjects Protection Program, Navajo Area Indian Health Boards, the Navajo Nation Agency Councils, and the Navajo Nation Human Research and Review Board approved the project. The
primary author (P.R.S.) and the project advisory committee received approvals from 4 Navajo Nation Agency Councils (Northern, Western, Fort Defiance, Chinle), each of which required a tribal council resolution. The process of gathering these approvals took more than 1 year; the
proposed research protocol was then submitted to the Navajo Nation Human Research and Review Board for approval.
We conducted an analysis to determine whether the number of correct answers to the 8 knowledge questions could be considered a reliable measure of screening knowledge. For this scale,
Cronbach α, a measure of internal consistency, was low
at .50, indicating that the total knowledge score should be interpreted cautiously and that individual knowledge questions should be examined individually. Because the relationship between CRC rates and sex is complex, we excluded from the
total knowledge score the answer to “Men have a much higher risk for colon cancer
than women.”
We scored the survey on the basis of shared (correct) responses to the 8 true/false knowledge questions. We used SPSS 15.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, Illinois) for data analysis. To determine the relationships between having heard of colon cancer and being screened and demographic characteristics, we conducted χ2 analyses in addition to simple frequencies. We used t tests and analysis of variance tests to determine whether the total knowledge scores were related
to other variables. Unless otherwise indicated, statistical tests were 2-sided and P values of less than .05 were considered significant.
Back to top
Results
Of the 285 Navajo respondents who completed the questionnaire, 39% were aged 50 or older
(Table 1). Approximately half of the
women (52%) were aged 30 to 49 years; most of the men (49%) were aged 50 to 79 years. Education ranged from no formal education to completion of a doctoral degree.
Knowledge of risk factors and prevention
The entire sample had an error rate of less than 20% on the knowledge statements (21 missing and
“don’t know” responses were not counted as shared responses)
(Table 2). The mean score on the 7-item knowledge scale was 5.78 (standard deviation [SD], 1.28).
We examined the relationship between knowledge and screening by comparing the knowledge scores of those aged 50 or older who were screened and
those who were not screened
(Table 3). Respondents who reported having been screened had a higher degree of accuracy on all questions. The t test on the total knowledge score (based on 7 questions) indicated that respondents who were screened (mean, 6.2) had a significantly higher knowledge score than those who were not screened (mean, 5.4; P =
.001).
Relationship between sociodemographic variables, CRC, and CRC screening
knowledge
Seventy-four percent of respondents who were aged 49 or younger reported having heard of CRC, compared with 77% for those aged 50 or older. More than half of both women (77%) and men (65%) reported having heard of CRC (P = .032).
Level of education was a factor in knowledge of CRC; 88% of respondents with more than a high school education had heard about CRC, compared with 42% of those who had a high school education or less (P = .001). People who said they had heard of CRC were significantly more knowledgeable about prevention and risk (had 6 correct answers to the 8 true/false questions) than those who said they had not.
CRC screening knowledge was not significantly related to sex, age group (Table 3), or self-reported health
(Table 4). Respondents who
spoke only English (n = 44) had higher scores than those who spoke only Navajo
(n = 29) or were bilingual (n = 212).
CRC screening
Screening status was related to sex, education, language, and health status
(Table 5). “Don’t know” responses were counted as not screened for CRC. Respondents who had heard about CRC screening were significantly more likely to have been screened (7% of respondents aged 49 years or younger and 28% of those aged 50 or older reported having been screened for CRC).
Most respondents reported having had their CRC screening test at an IHS hospital on the Navajo Reservation. Most respondents (54%) were screened in Arizona and the remainder in New Mexico (37%), Colorado (7%), or Utah (2%). We asked no further questions related to CRC screening experience. Screening was not significantly related to the rest of the variables.
Back to top
Discussion
Incidence and mortality rates of CRC among AI/ANs vary widely by region; AIs in the Southwest have the lowest rates (1). Furthermore, AI/ANs are less likely to receive a diagnosis of early-stage CRC than non-Hispanic whites, and this difference is greatest for people who live in the Southwest (1). A later stage at diagnosis could result from lack of screening. Using data from the BRFSS, Espey et al show that although AI/ANs have lower rates of CRC screening (FOBT or endoscopy) than
non-Hispanic whites, the difference is most pronounced for people in the Southwest (1).
Data on knowledge of CRC prevention and screening among AI/ANs are sparse. To fill this gap, we collected data on knowledge of CRC risk factors and prevention and CRC screening among Navajo adults. Because the Navajo population is widely dispersed on the Navajo Reservation, which covers New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah, access to this group is challenging. Obstacles include poor road conditions, a low percentage of landline telephones, a lack of transportation, and language barriers. A
potentially effective way to reach Navajo adults is by meeting them at the annual Navajo Nation fairs.
The American Cancer Society identifies risk factors for developing possible colorectal polyps or CRC as age, especially being aged 50 or older; a personal
or family history of CRC; inflammatory bowel disease, such as Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis; and inherited genetic diseases, such as familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer,
and type 2 diabetes; and certain lifestyle factors (12). The lifestyle factors include lack of exercise; a high-fat,
low-fiber diet; obesity; smoking; and high intake of alcoholic beverages (13).
The development of this survey, which was implemented with input from local tribal community representatives,
was similar to that of Guadagnolo et al (13). This input and involvement is essential in Indian country. The
primary author consulted with the study’s project advisory committee for input in survey development to show courtesy and respect and to draw on their expertise in working with Navajo adults. This input addressed the unique geography, language, practices,
beliefs, and attitudes characteristic of many rural tribal communities.
Results of our work are supported by those of Tseng et al, in which Navajo adults aged 50 or older who had heard of and had been screened for CRC were more knowledgeable than those who were not screened (14). Our results also show that knowledge of CRC screening did not vary by sex (14).
More than half of Navajo women and less than half of Navajo men had heard of CRC. The significance of this finding may be linked to the Education and Research Towards Health (EARTH) study conducted March 2004 through July 30, 2007 (15). Our study was conducted from September through October 2006 when the EARTH study was in progress on the Navajo reservation. The EARTH study recorded self-reported screening rates for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer. The EARTH study (15) results show
that higher education, higher income, and having 1 or 2 medical conditions are associated with cancer screening, in accordance with the outcome of our survey.
Some limitations of this study warrant consideration. The first is that all data are self-reported. People may have exaggerated their awareness of CRC or the frequency with which they have been screened. Some may have confused a digital rectal exam with CRC screening, which would inflate the screening rates. A second limitation is that the respondents were not a random sample of Navajos. People who attend tribal fairs are unlikely to be representative of all members of the Navajo Nation, and
people who approached the Arizona Cancer Center (AZCC) booth may have been more interested in and knowledgeable about cancer issues than others at the fairs who did not approach the AZCC booth
or table. Thus, the screening rate observed here should not be used as a rate for the Navajo Nation as a whole. A third limitation is that the data were cross-sectional. We cannot comment on whether knowledge tends to increase screening or whether screening tends to increase knowledge.
Few Navajo men participated in this study. We had one male Navajo surveyor in the same booth with the
primary author and a female Navajo surveyor. For future research, we suggest having separate fair survey booths (male Navajo investigators to survey Navajo men and female Navajo investigators to survey Navajo women). This change may encourage Navajo men aged 50 or older to complete a CRC knowledge survey. Besides being near the tribal exhibit booths, the survey booths could be set up
close to the rodeo grounds and song-and-dance arena; most Navajo men aged 50 or older participate in or watch these events.
Results of our study show that knowledge of CRC screening among Navajo adults was high but that overall screening was low. In addition, people with higher education were more likely to have heard of CRC and to have received screening. These results support the need to develop culturally appropriate information in both the English and Navajo languages, specifically tailored to those who are aged 50 years or older. This tailored screening information needs to take into account low literacy
levels and may need to consider oral and written methods.
Back to top
Acknowledgments
We thank our Navajo respondents, surveyors, and project advisory committee; the Navajo Division of Health’s Navajo Breast and Cervical Cancer Project,
community health representatives, and Navajo Nation Human Research and Review Board; and Northern Navajo Medical Center’s Health Promotion Program. While conducting this research, Dr Sanderson was supported by a R25 Cancer Prevention and Control Training Program postdoctoral fellowship from the National Cancer
Institute (CA-078447) and an Arizona Cancer Center Support Grant (CA023074).
Back to top
Author Information
Corresponding Author: Priscilla R. Sanderson, PhD, CRC, Northern Arizona University, College of Health and Human Services, Health Sciences Department,
College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Applied Indigenous Studies, PO Box 115095, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5095. Telephone: 928-523-6741. E-mail:
priscilla.sanderson@nau.edu. At the time of the study, Dr Sanderson was a research associate/postdoctoral fellow with the Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arizona Cancer Center, College of Medicine, University of Arizona,
Tucson, Arizona.
Author Affiliations: Neil Weinstein, Nicolette Teufel-Shone, and María Elena Martínez, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Back to top
References
- Espey DK, Wu XC, Swan J, Wiggins C, Jim MA, Ward E, et al.
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives. Cancer 2007;110(10):2119-52.
- Purdue DG, Perkins C, Jackson-Thompson J, Coughlin SS, Ahmed F, Haverkamp DS, et al.
Regional differences in CRC incidence, stage, and subsite among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1999-2004. Cancer 2008;113(5 Suppl):1179-90.
- Wiggins CL, Espey DK, Wingo PA, Kaur JS, Wilson RT, Swan J, et al.
Cancer among American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States, 1999-2004. Cancer 2008;113(5
Suppl):1142-52.
- Stretcher V, Rosenstock I. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B, editors. Health behavior and health education. San Francisco
(CA): Jossey-Bass, 1997;44-5.
- Meade CD, Calvo A, Rivera M.
Screening and community outreach programs for priority populations: considerations for oncology managers. J Oncol Manag 2002;11(5):20-8.
- Wolf MS, Rademaker A, Bennett CL, Ferreira MR, Dolan NC, Davis TC, et al. Development of a brief survey on colon cancer screening knowledge and attitudes among veterans. Prev Chronic Dis 2005;2(2).
http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/apr/04_0104.htm. Accessed August 19, 2010.
- Finalyson TL, Siefert K, Ismail A, Delva J, Sohn W.
Reliability and validity of brief measures of oral health-related knowledge, fatalism, and self-efficacy in mothers of African American children. Pediatr Dent 2005;27(5):422-8.
- Conner M, Norman P. Predicting health behavior: research and practice with Social Cognition Models. Buckingham (GB): Open University Press; 2005.
- Burhansstipanov L. Get on the path to colon health. http://www.natamcancer.org/page32.html. Accessed August 19, 2010.
- Health Information National Trends (HINTS). Main study interview instrument (English). Post analysis version. July 2003. http://hints.cancer.gov/docs/HINTS_2003_Instrument-English.pdf. Accessed August 19, 2010.
- CRC screening: a circle of health for Alaskans. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/pdf/circle_health_alaskans.pdf. Accessed August 18, 2010.
- Detailed guide: colon and rectum cancer. What are the risk factors for colorectal cancer? American Cancer Society.
http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/ColonandRectumCancer/DetailedGuide/colorectal-cancer-risk-factors. Accessed August 18, 2010.
- Guadagnolo BA, Cina K, Helbig P, Molloy K, Reiner M, Cook EF, et al.
Assessing cancer stage and screening disparities among Native American cancer patients. Public Health Rep 2009;124(1):79-89.
- Tseng T-S, Holt CL, Shipp M, Eloubeidi M, Britt K, Norena M, et al.
Predictors of CRC knowledge and screening among church-attending African Americans and Whites in the Deep South. J Community Health 2009;34(2):90-7.
- Schumacher MC, Slattery ML, Lanier AP, Ma KN, Edwards S, Ferucci ED, et al.
Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska native people: the EARTH study. Cancer Causes Control 2008;19(7):725-37.
Back to top
